Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 11:35 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 11:35 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
22 Mar 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
59% (01:32) correct
41%
(01:53)
wrong
based on 184
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The juvenile literacy rate, number of adolescents per 100 who are literate, in Keating has risen forty percent over the previous three years ago. In Nickleby, the juvenile literacy rate has risen only twelve percent over the same time period. This data supports the conclusion that adolescents growing up in Keating are more likely to become literate than are adolescents growing up in Nickleby.
The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
A. how the juvenile population density of both Keating and Nickleby has changed over the past three years
B. what the juvenile literacy rates of Keating and Nickleby were three years ago
C. the change in the ratio of literate to illiterate juveniles three years ago and now in Keating and Nickleby
D. a comparison between the rate of juvenile population growth in Keating over the past three years and the corresponding rate in Nickleby
E. a comparison between expenditures on juvenile education made over the past three years in Keating and the same made in Nickleby
The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
A. how the juvenile population density of both Keating and Nickleby has changed over the past three years
B. what the juvenile literacy rates of Keating and Nickleby were three years ago
C. the change in the ratio of literate to illiterate juveniles three years ago and now in Keating and Nickleby
D. a comparison between the rate of juvenile population growth in Keating over the past three years and the corresponding rate in Nickleby
E. a comparison between expenditures on juvenile education made over the past three years in Keating and the same made in Nickleby
22 Mar 2026, 22:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
Pre thinking:
Here we are given the rates, so the logic gap is that the rates of Nickleby could have already had a larger rate hence a +12% would be greater than +40% in Keating.
Option B perfectly portrays this prethinking.
Other options:
A --> Irrelevant
C --? Irrelevant
D --> The comparision is what is mentioned in the passage itself.
E --> Irrelevant
Here we are given the rates, so the logic gap is that the rates of Nickleby could have already had a larger rate hence a +12% would be greater than +40% in Keating.
Option B perfectly portrays this prethinking.
Other options:
A --> Irrelevant
C --? Irrelevant
D --> The comparision is what is mentioned in the passage itself.
E --> Irrelevant
ExpertsGlobal5
23 Mar 2026, 03:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
ExpertsGlobal5
JLR is the number of adolescents who are literate per 100 literate population. Compared to three years ago, the JLR for keating has risen by 40% and for Nickleby has risen by 12%.
The data concludes, keating to be more literate than Nickleby.
A. how the juvenile population density of both Keating and Nickleby has changed over the past three years.
The population density is the number of persons living per square metre. So, we are not concerned with the population being clustered or scattered. This is irrelevant. Hence, wrong.
B. what the juvenile literacy rates of Keating and Nickleby were three years ago.
This option clearly defines the base rates of the two regions in comparison. If the base rates are known then, the % increase can attribute to a definite figure. As the rates are per 100, we can use it for calculating the increase. Hence, correct answer.
C. the change in the ratio of literate to illiterate juveniles three years ago and now in Keating and Nickleby.
If we know the literate % , we can take the inverse to arrive at illiterate juveniles. So, it works vice versa. Hence, wrong.
D. a comparison between the rate of juvenile population growth in Keating over the past three years and the corresponding rate in Nickleby.
The year on year rate fluctuations is not needed to arrive at the conclusion. Hence, wrong.
E. a comparison between expenditures on juvenile education made over the past three years in Keating and the same made in Nickleby.
This is an irrelevant and completely out of scope answer. Hence, Wrong.
Option B
23 Mar 2026, 07:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
in keating, literact rate has risen 40% over last 3 years whereas in Nickleby, the rate has risen 12% over same time period.
conclusion- adolescents in Keating are more likely to become literate than in Nickleby
A. how the juvenile population density of both Keating and Nickleby has changed over the past three years
this has no impact whatsoever.
B. what the juvenile literacy rates of Keating and Nickleby were three years ago.
perfect. if we can find that keating was doing bad and now have improved, conlusion holds true but otherwise not.
C. the change in the ratio of literate to illiterate juveniles three years ago and now in Keating and Nickleby
already mentioned in passage.
D. a comparison between the rate of juvenile population growth in Keating over the past three years and the corresponding rate in Nickleby
but we know the rate has risen so they both are doing something to increase the rate but we cant tell from this why the conclusion is flawed.
E. a comparison between expenditures on juvenile education made over the past three years in Keating and the same made in Nickleby
irrelevant.
conclusion- adolescents in Keating are more likely to become literate than in Nickleby
A. how the juvenile population density of both Keating and Nickleby has changed over the past three years
this has no impact whatsoever.
B. what the juvenile literacy rates of Keating and Nickleby were three years ago.
perfect. if we can find that keating was doing bad and now have improved, conlusion holds true but otherwise not.
C. the change in the ratio of literate to illiterate juveniles three years ago and now in Keating and Nickleby
already mentioned in passage.
D. a comparison between the rate of juvenile population growth in Keating over the past three years and the corresponding rate in Nickleby
but we know the rate has risen so they both are doing something to increase the rate but we cant tell from this why the conclusion is flawed.
E. a comparison between expenditures on juvenile education made over the past three years in Keating and the same made in Nickleby
irrelevant.
ExpertsGlobal5
