Last visit was: 10 Sep 2026, 03:59 It is currently 10 Sep 2026, 03:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,357
Own Kudos:
840,424
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,448
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,357
Kudos: 840,424
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dhart
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 186
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 186
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
harjas2222
Joined: 09 Dec 2023
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
26
 [2]
Given Kudos: 83
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Posts: 57
Kudos: 26
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Minka99
Joined: 15 Jun 2026
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 87
Location: Austria
Concentration: Accounting, Other
Products:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 34
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll write the reasons why I eliminated answers first:
A) 1910s seems too specific, since the passage does not mention when the bird is believed to have gone extinct. The rabbit situation could have happened after, it is unclear.
B) Mating is not mentioned as one of the 2 potential reasons, so its out of scope
C) this doesn't really strengthen either or; it explains how the ground vegetation scenario but does not provide information to sway us in either direction
E) this is completely irrelevant- we are only interested in the exact species

This leaves D as the correct answer in my mind: An increase in the use of pesticides resulted in a decrease in the numbers of flies and moths present in the Laysan Rails territory. This is the only answer choice that actually strengthens one by weakening the other
User avatar
Vivek1707
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 359
Own Kudos:
195
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 359
Kudos: 195
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. This explains why vegetation decreased, which supports the old explanation, not why scientists changed their minds.
B. This explains why relocation attempts failed, but doesn't explain the original extinction.
C. This confirms that lack of ground vegetation could affect nesting, again supporting the old theory.
D. Correct Pesticides reduced flies and moths, which are the Rail's food. So the bird may have faced food scarcity, providing a reason to shift from the nesting-vegetation explanation to competition for food.
E. Other species using the same vegetation could explain competition for nesting sites, not competition for foo
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
704 posts