agrasan
Hi experts
KarishmaB MartyMurray DmitryFarber IanStewartI understand why E is correct but still a bit confused why option A is wrong?
My reasoning is: we know that heart-attacks and strokes take less time. If number of cases for them declined this year along with gunshot wounds+electrocutions, then it strengthens the conclusion. Am I making any stretch here?
Separately, could I reject this option by the logic of Quant that decrease in number won't explain the average change? only the change in mix (gunshots, strokes, etc.) will explain that?Yes, exactly this. If average of 10 numbers is 56, can you say what the average of 8 of those numbers is? You cannot say that it must be less than 56. It could be same or much more than 56 too. It depends on which 8 numbers you picked.