Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 10:15 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 10:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
4,247
 [39]
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,247
 [39]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
36
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,620
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,235
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,620
Kudos: 742,734
 [19]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 859
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 859
Kudos: 7,325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
zonk
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Last visit: 10 Nov 2013
Posts: 366
Own Kudos:
348
 [3]
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship, Health Care
Schools:Wharton
 Q50  V44
Posts: 366
Kudos: 348
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sondenso
alimad
The median annual household income in a certain community of 21 households is $50,000. If the mean income of a household increases by 10 % / year over the next 2 years, what will be the median income in the community be in 2 years?

50,000
60,000
60,500
65,000
cannot be determined.

Please respond with your answers. thanks

I think E, I find no connection btw the increase and the median!

I agree on E.

The median could change depending on which incomes grow and by how much.

For example,

all incomes could grow by 10% each, meaning the median would also grow by 10%.

Or

the lowest income could grow by a huge number, moving it into the top half of incomes, which would completely change the median.
User avatar
nmohindru
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Last visit: 06 Jul 2013
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
487
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 157
Kudos: 487
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Should be e)

Mean increasing by certain % doesnt mean that median should increase by same %.

Median will only increase by same % if all data point move ahead by same % but increase of mean does not guarantee that all data points are moving by same % as well.
User avatar
nikhil007
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Last visit: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 48
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nmohindru
Should be e)

Mean increasing by certain % doesnt mean that median should increase by same %.

Median will only increase by same % if all data point move ahead by same % but increase of mean does not guarantee that all data points are moving by same % as well.

Hi,

I am a bit confused now,

I thought this was the rule..
" If we increase or decrease each term in a set by the same percent:
Mean will increase or decrease by the same percent.
SD will increase or decrease by the same percent.

so by that if mean increase by 10%, shouldn't all data points move by 10%..?

By the way, above rule was also Highlighted in one of the post by Bunuel Here
ps-questions-about-standard-deviation-85897.html

am I missing a point here? can someone please explain the concept here?
User avatar
nikhil007
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Last visit: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 48
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Reverse of this property is not true: if the mean increases by a certain percent it doesn't necessarily mean that each term increases by the same percent.

Consider the following set: {1, 2, 3} --> mean=median=2 and sum=6. Now, if we increase the mean by 100%, we increase the sum by 100%, so it'll become 12. But new set can be {0, 0, 12}: the third element increased and the first two elements decreased or {2, 2, 8}: the first and the third elements increased and the second remained the same...

You can apply the same logic to the question at hand.

Answer: E.

Wow thats an usefull insight..Kudos..!!
User avatar
ziko
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.9
WE:Marketing (Other)
Posts: 91
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is E, because there are different numbers in the set and we are not sure which side of the numbers in the set will be increased so the mean is increase by 10%. It could be the case that small number of higher end incomes increased a little or many low end incomes increased - it cannot be identified.
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 760
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 760
Kudos: 4,300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E

For example, if the highest value increase enough to increase in 10% the mean, the median will be the same.
Other scenario is that every value increases in 10%, including the median.
We cannot determine the new median.
User avatar
JusTLucK04
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Last visit: 27 Jul 2017
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
1,311
 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But here the It is clearly mentioned that it is the mean income of a household..So here the mean refers to the average rise in income of the household members and not the mean of the incomes of the cimmunity..I think it is a typo error or I am missing something here...
Correct me if I am wrong
User avatar
PiyushK
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 599
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 235
Status:Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 599
Kudos: 4,879
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JusTLucK04
But here the It is clearly mentioned that it is the mean income of a household..So here the mean refers to the average rise in income of the household members and not the mean of the incomes of the cimmunity..I think it is a typo error or I am missing something here...
Correct me if I am wrong

We can not determine the median income from provided data.

The median annual household income in a certain community of 21 households is $50,000. If the mean income of a household increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, what will the median income in the community be in 2 years?

As we do not know that distribution of income is uniform we can not conclude that median = mean

from provided data we got that 11th household is earning $50,000
Let mean = x increase by 10% for next 2 years... we do not whether every house hold income has increased or few has increased or for few remain constant or reduced.. its easy to get 10% rise in mean by just increasing income for few households ..thus we can not construct data set and we can not get median.

Answer is E.
User avatar
JusTLucK04
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Last visit: 27 Jul 2017
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PiyushK
JusTLucK04
But here the It is clearly mentioned that it is the mean income of a household..So here the mean refers to the average rise in income of the household members and not the mean of the incomes of the cimmunity..I think it is a typo error or I am missing something here...
Correct me if I am wrong

We can not determine the median income from provided data.

The median annual household income in a certain community of 21 households is $50,000. If the mean income of a household increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, what will the median income in the community be in 2 years?

As we do not know that distribution of income is uniform we can not conclude that median = mean

from provided data we got that 11th household is earning $50,000
Let mean = x increase by 10% for next 2 years... we do not whether every house hold income has increased or few has increased or for few remain constant or reduced.. its easy to get 10% rise in mean by just increasing income for few households ..thus we can not construct data set and we can not get median.

Answer is E.

Bahh..My bad..I read it extremely wrongly. :toilet ...I was referring to the income rise from household members.. :yikes Don't know where did that come from..Guess I did :sleep better
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,779
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,779
Kudos: 1,449
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E. Mean and median aren't interchangeable. The mean can have a very different value from the median if there are many households with very high or low incomes. Without the value of the mean provided, there's no way to predict what it will be.
avatar
Kavya123
Joined: 20 Jul 2017
Last visit: 24 Oct 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is E.
The mean can be changed by changing one or more observations. As correctly pointed out in posts above, 10% increase in mean over two years doesn't mean that each observation increases by 10%. Therefore median may or may not be 50,000 after two years. When you assume the theory that each observation is changing by 10% per year, answer comes out to be $60,500.
User avatar
hulk007
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
The median annual household income in a certain community of 21 households is $50,000. If the mean income of a household increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, what will the median income in the community be in 2 years?

(A) $50,000
(B) $60,000
(C) $60,500
(D) $65,000
(E) Cannot be determined

"If the mean income of a household ..." It doesnt say if the mean annual income increases by 10%.
I believe this question is meant to throw off people for not following the thumb rule blindly just because it mentions median,mean & % increase.

Doesnt the question mean, 10% for each family , thus increasing each value in the set by 10% , thus increasing the median also by 10% eventually being 60,500 ?

( not following the thumb rule here , just going by logic)
User avatar
hulk007
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JusTLucK04
But here the It is clearly mentioned that it is the mean income of a household..So here the mean refers to the average rise in income of the household members and not the mean of the incomes of the cimmunity..I think it is a typo error or I am missing something here...
Correct me if I am wrong

yes i felt the same.

"If the mean income of a household ..." It doesnt say if the mean annual income increases by 10%.
I believe this question is meant to throw off people for not following the thumb rule blindly just because it mentions median,mean & % increase.

Doesnt the question mean, 10% for each family , thus increasing each value in the set by 10% , thus increasing the median also by 10% eventually being 60,500 ?

( not following the thumb rule here , just going by logic)
User avatar
hulk007
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nmohindru
Should be e)

Mean increasing by certain % doesnt mean that median should increase by same %.

Median will only increase by same % if all data point move ahead by same % but increase of mean does not guarantee that all data points are moving by same % as well.


"If the mean income of a household ..." It doesnt say if the mean annual income increases by 10%.
I believe this question is meant to throw off people for not following the thumb rule blindly just because it mentions median,mean & % increase.

Doesnt the question mean, 10% for each family , thus increasing each value in the set by 10% , thus increasing the median also by 10% eventually being 60,500 ?

( not following the thumb rule here , just going by logic)
avatar
masoomjnegi
Joined: 20 Dec 2018
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Posts: 34
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Increase in mean value of a set has no direct relation with the increase in median value of the set. Here, we are given the increase in the mean value but we don’t know if the increase is because of change in just 1 value of because of the change in all values. Hence, we can’t determine the change in median. Hence, E is the answer.
User avatar
hulk007
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
masoomjnegi
Increase in mean value of a set has no direct relation with the increase in median value of the set. Here, we are given the increase in the mean value but we don’t know if the increase is because of change in just 1 value of because of the change in all values. Hence, we can’t determine the change in median. Hence, E is the answer.


"If the mean income of a household ..." It doesnt say if the mean annual income increases by 10%.
Doesnt the question mean, 10% for each family , thus increasing each value in the set by 10%

i say again , i think this question was designed to throw off people for not blindly applying/ignoring the thumb rule .
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 21,145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 296
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,145
Kudos: 26,204
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alimad
The median annual household income in a certain community of 21 households is $50,000. If the mean income of a household increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, what will the median income in the community be in 2 years?

(A) $50,000
(B) $60,000
(C) $60,500
(D) $65,000
(E) Cannot be determined

It’s impossible to determine the median household income from the information given. For example, if the reason the mean household income increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years is because the annual income of every household increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, then the median household income would also increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years, to 50,000 x 1.1 x 1.1 = $60,500. However, it’s possible that only the household with the highest annual income increases by a tremendous amount each year for the next 2 years, such that the mean household income for the community increases by 10% per year over the next 2 years. In that case, the median household income would stay the same at the end of the 2 years, i.e., at $50,000.

Answer: E
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
102620 posts
PS Forum Moderator
698 posts