It is currently 20 Feb 2018, 15:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1883
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2005, 09:44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

A. The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus
B. To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
C. The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
D. Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
E. In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 360
Location: London
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2005, 01:35
IMO it's E.

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

B and D have misplaced modifiers.
C is out cause the only eyewitness is in two letter?
A and E are left. It's really difficult to see anything wrong with
A but I'll go for E.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1883
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2005, 01:55
Sorry for my late OA which is indeed E as you all picked.
OE is as follow:
E, the best choice, conveys its meaning clearly, without ambiguity, and uses straightforward syntax. In A, the placement of the phrase in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity: the nonsensical suggestion is that the eruption of Vesuvius took place in the letters themselves. In B, the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the prededing clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts. Furthermore, To the historian Tacitus, the nephew...wrote two letters is unnecessarily clumsy. In C, the meaning of the sentence is unclear( The only eyewitness account of what?), the repetition of account is clumsy, and the syntax is highly convoluted(...in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account...). In D, Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted is redundant, and the placement of in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity, suggesting under one available reading that the eruption took place in the letters.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5029
Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2005, 02:51
A- Awkward phrasing
B - illogically suggest the letter did the writing
C - 'writing' (to the historian Tacitus) is redundant
D- Problem with tenses

E is the best choice.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 31
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2006, 06:55
I agree with E,

I have a doubt with the given explanation :

B : To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

In B, the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the prededing clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts

Wouldnt the clause that starts with "Being" modify either Tacitus or two letters? How should we determine whether it modifies the subject or nearest Verb?

Thanks
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 31
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2006, 20:42
Y r ppl so obsessive abt count of posts over here... I dont c a single soul answering to the clarification posted by the last poster. Intead the posters just post the answer WITHOUT any value addition as though there is a poll whose decision will be based on no of votes .. :evil:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2006, 22:06
avomc wrote:
I agree with E,

I have a doubt with the given explanation :

B : To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

In B, the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the prededing clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts

Wouldnt the clause that starts with "Being" modify either Tacitus or two letters? How should we determine whether it modifies the subject or nearest Verb?

Thanks


Modifier sometimes modifies subject of the preceding clause, somentimes verb or sometimes whole clause. It depends on the type of modifier.
Normally, adverbial modifier modifies entire preceding phrase. Here "Being" is modifying entire phrase "the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters".
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 110
Location: Canada
Re: SC the nephew [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2008, 20:00
Quote:
E. In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius


Can I argue that it is the nephew who is in two l letters i.e. "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" modifies "the nephew of Pliny the Elder"?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1437
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: SC the nephew [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2008, 08:15
snaps wrote:
Quote:
E. In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius


Can I argue that it is the nephew who is in two l letters i.e. "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" modifies "the nephew of Pliny the Elder"?


I wish somebody could explain this extremely genuine concern. I am almost certain that the explanation will be that it sounds idiomatic to the ear. Certain aspects of English Language are a bit too hard for the non-native speakers like myself to understand.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2467
Re: SC the nephew [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2008, 08:44
dwivedys wrote:
snaps wrote:
Quote:
E. In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius


Can I argue that it is the nephew who is in two l letters i.e. "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" modifies "the nephew of Pliny the Elder"?


I wish somebody could explain this extremely genuine concern. I am almost certain that the explanation will be that it sounds idiomatic to the ear. Certain aspects of English Language are a bit too hard for the non-native speakers like myself to understand.



laxieqv wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

A. The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus
B. To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
C. The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
D. Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
E. In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.


"the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote" modifies "In two letters to the historian Tacitus".

OE given by laxieqv is much clear.

laxieqv wrote:
Sorry for my late OA which is indeed E as you all picked.
OE is as follow:
E, the best choice, conveys its meaning clearly, without ambiguity, and uses straightforward syntax. In A, the placement of the phrase in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity: the nonsensical suggestion is that the eruption of Vesuvius took place in the letters themselves. In B, the verb phrase that begins being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the prededing clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts. Furthermore, To the historian Tacitus, the nephew...wrote two letters is unnecessarily clumsy. In C, the meaning of the sentence is unclear( The only eyewitness account of what?), the repetition of account is clumsy, and the syntax is highly convoluted(...in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account...). In D, Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted is redundant, and the placement of in two letters to the historian Tacitus generates ambiguity, suggesting under one available reading that the eruption took place in the letters.

_________________

Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

Re: SC the nephew   [#permalink] 29 Oct 2008, 08:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.