Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 24 Mar 2017, 19:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 4

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2009, 08:18
42
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (02:07) correct 41% (01:11) wrong based on 1698 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1880
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 41

Kudos [?]: 581 [1] , given: 32

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2009, 11:57
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I don't think there is anything technically wrong with A. It has proper subject-verb agreement, there are not any issues with plural / singular nouns and verbs. The problem I have with A is that it is so wordy. Look at how many prepositional phrases are used. "of Pliny the Elder", "of the great eruption", "of Versuvius", "in two letters", "to the historian Tacitus." That's a lot of prep phrases. E has about the same number, but the phrases are better organized.

I like the way E uses the appositive in the beginning to "set the stage".

E seems like a more consice, clear sentence as opposed to A. Once you narrow it to A or E, it's not an easy choice.

sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 214 [1] , given: 4

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 01:54
1
KUDOS
jallenmorris , in terms of concisesness ,both are equally worded ,if you see you ll find an extra "," in E ,but as per my understanding the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus. ,is trying to sense it like the eruption occured in two letters !!,whereas in E it is clearly stated that it is the first object ,subject wrote ,make sense ??
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 3

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 07:39
A looks like a run on sentence. Eruption in two letters or wrote in two letters?
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 214 [1] , given: 4

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2009, 09:17
1
KUDOS
If you ll see the option A it will look like eruption in two letter instead of wrote in two letter
Current Student
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 256
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 190 [1] , given: 65

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 23:37
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius
_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful.

My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487

Last edited by scheol79 on 02 Nov 2010, 08:24, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 25

Re: Logical predication; Rhetorical construction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2010, 00:59
1
KUDOS
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
This sentence makes it seem that The eruption occurred in two letters.

(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
The nephew was not the eyewitness account. The letters were. This sentence does not clearly point that out.

(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
Repetition of 'account'. The account wasn't in the letters, the letters were the eyewitness account.

(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
The tenses of 'writing' and 'accounted for' do not agree. Again repetition of 'account'

(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

We can reverse the order of the sentence and it still makes sense.
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius In two letters to the historian Tacitus.
_________________

Give [highlight]KUDOS [/highlight] if you like my post.

Always do things which make you feel ALIVE!!!

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3758
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 759

Kudos [?]: 5881 [0], given: 324

Re: Logical predication; Rhetorical construction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2010, 02:04
The problem here is the awkward placement of the phrase - the eruption of Vesuvius in two letters, - giving the feeling that the eruption took place in two letters; on this count, the A and D can be eliminated.
B has the untouchable participle – being - ; in addition - the only eyewitness accounts - should be - the only eyewitness account-
C. - nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to – as if he is just now writing. Wrong diction

E is the best, bringing out in simple terms the intended meaning
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 188
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 5

Re: Logical predication; Rhetorical construction [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2010, 01:28
E ... Only option that is clear and understandable.
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2011, 18:15
I do not understand.
Doesn't (E) changes the meaning of the sentence?

(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, - we do not know who gave these letters to Tacitus. Somehow Tacitus got two letters.
the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius. - In the letter, it is mentioned that Pliny wrote only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

So (E) is telling that Tacitus got two letters from someone, somehow, and in those letters, only the fact that Pliny wrote only what he saw about the great eruption is mentioned. But original sentence is supposed to mean that Pliny wrote 2 letters, which has description of the eruption, to Tacitus.
Isn't it?
Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2011, 09:04
Torn between A and E. Picked A. Can someone post the OA?
Manager
Status: MLT Fellowship - MBA Prep
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Posts: 173
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.47
WE: Sales (Retail Banking)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 8

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2011, 10:55
A has too many prepositions after one another... it becomes ambiguous. For instance, the eruption of V is followed with 'in two letters'. The eruption clearly did not take place in the letters.

It is better to have 'two letters' closer to the verb "wrote"...

E solves this.
_________________

Brandon Hoffman

Management Leadership of Tomorrow (MLT) - MBA Programs Fellow
MLT LA Chapter - Board Member / Recruiting Officer
Net Impact - Professional Chapter Co-President
MBADiversity Organization - Global Fellow, CHINA

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 89
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 15

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2011, 08:28
Between E and A, I picked E.

E seems to give more clarity. No other reason.

OA with OE will be appreciated
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 145
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 12

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2011, 02:03
sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

A changes the meaning of the sentence. Almost sounds as if the great erruption is happening in the 2 letters. E corrects the issue.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 164
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 29

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2011, 03:41
I am confused between C & E.
The issue that i see with E the ",nephew of Pliny the Elder" seems to refer to historian Tacitus.
C on the other hand is wordy but clear.

Can someone please explain why is C incorrect?
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2034
Followers: 2149

Kudos [?]: 7461 [21] , given: 281

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2011, 12:01
21
KUDOS
Expert's post
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Since you have posted a doubt on C and E, lets consider choices A, C, and E only:

Meaning Analysis - (Choice A)

• The sentence talks about a person X - who is nephew of Pliny the Elder
• Person X wrote the only eyewitness account.
• This account is of the great eruption of Vesuvius
• He wrote the account in two letters
• The letters were written to the historian Tacitus

Errors Analysis of Choice A

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

Logically the modifier in “red” should provide additional information about the action – wrote – where did he write this only eyewitness account. But its placement after “eruption of Vesuvius” implies that the “eruption took place in two letters”. This is illogical. This is the error in choice A.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice C

The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

First of all this choice only communicates partial meaning:
• It is not clear that the “only eyewitness account” is of the great eruption of Vesuvius”. This sentence seems to imply that the ONLY eyewitness account is in the letters that contain an account of the eruption of Vesuvius. This is clearly not what we want to communicate. We want to talk specifically about the ONLY eyewitness account of eruption of Vesuvius.

Secondly, the expression “nephew …writing to the historian Tacitus..” non-sensically describes the nephew and somehow gives the sense that the nephew is still writing the letters. This should instead express a one- time action done by the nephew.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice E

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
This sentence correctly communicates the meaning.

Your statement that "nephew of Pliny the Elder" seems to refer to historian Tacitus.” is not correct. Note that the modifier is not “historian Tacitus”. The complete modifier is “in two letters to the historian Tacitus”. Now this prepositional modifier provides more information about the action – wrote. Where did the nephew write? In the 2 letters to historian Tacitus.

Take-away

– Focus on the meaning of the sentence and pay close attention to how the sentence structure of the sentences.

Payal
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 560
Location: United States
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 16

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2011, 01:48
A looks like a run on sentence

I will go with E
_________________

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 410
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 280 [1] , given: 34

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 01:04
1
KUDOS
egmat wrote:
Since you have posted a doubt on C and E, lets consider choices A, C, and E only:

Meaning Analysis - (Choice A)

• The sentence talks about a person X - who is nephew of Pliny the Elder
• Person X wrote the only eyewitness account.
• This account is of the great eruption of Vesuvius
• He wrote the account in two letters
• The letters were written to the historian Tacitus

Errors Analysis of Choice A

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

Logically the modifier in “red” should provide additional information about the action – wrote – where did he write this only eyewitness account. But its placement after “eruption of Vesuvius” implies that the “eruption took place in two letters”. This is illogical. This is the error in choice A.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice C

The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

First of all this choice only communicates partial meaning:
• It is not clear that the “only eyewitness account” is of the great eruption of Vesuvius”. This sentence seems to imply that the ONLY eyewitness account is in the letters that contain an account of the eruption of Vesuvius. This is clearly not what we want to communicate. We want to talk specifically about the ONLY eyewitness account of eruption of Vesuvius.

Secondly, the expression “nephew …writing to the historian Tacitus..” non-sensically describes the nephew and somehow gives the sense that the nephew is still writing the letters. This should instead express a one- time action done by the nephew.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice E

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
This sentence correctly communicates the meaning.

Your statement that "nephew of Pliny the Elder" seems to refer to historian Tacitus.” is not correct. Note that the modifier is not “historian Tacitus”. The complete modifier is “in two letters to the historian Tacitus”. Now this prepositional modifier provides more information about the action – wrote. Where did the nephew write? In the 2 letters to historian Tacitus.

Take-away

– Focus on the meaning of the sentence and pay close attention to how the sentence structure of the sentences.

Payal

Hey egmat
In Choice E, I came to conclusion that the phrase "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" is modifying "the nephew of Pliny the Elder", which is the subject of next clause as well. I scratched the choice E while answering this and now I am scratching my head wondering the principle behind prepositional Modifier logic used here. MGMAT explicit says that a modifying phrase should pair up with the closest noun it is associated with. WIth that in mind, I visualized that "the nephew is in two letters" and selected A upon E. What am I missing here?
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 560
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 75

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 01:11
(A) Vs (E)
+1 for (E) - concision
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2034
Followers: 2149

Kudos [?]: 7461 [8] , given: 281

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 11:19
8
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
joshnsit wrote:
Hey egmat
In Choice E, I came to conclusion that the phrase "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" is modifying "the nephew of Pliny the Elder", which is the subject of next clause as well. I scratched the choice E while answering this and now I am scratching my head wondering the principle behind prepositional Modifier logic used here. MGMAT explicit says that a modifying phrase should pair up with the closest noun it is associated with. WIth that in mind, I visualized that "the nephew is in two letters" and selected A upon E. What am I missing here?

Hi @joshnsit,

Prepositional phrases are very versatile modifiers. They can modify nouns as well as verbs. When a prepositional phrase modifies a noun, then it must be placed as close to the noun it modifies as possible. This is important to avoid any ambiguity in modification and to keep the intended meaning of the sentence clear.

So whenever we come across a prepositional phrase, we must first ascertain whether it is modifying a noun or a verb. So let’s bring in the OG question here and identify the entity the prepositional phrase should modify.

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The sentence says that the nephew of Pliny the elder was the only eyewitness to the great eruption of Vesuvius. So he wrote this eyewitness account in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The meaning of the sentence helps us determine which identity the prepositional phrase should modify. Here the prepositional phrase “in two letters” should modify the verb “wrote”. Where did the nephew of Pliny the Elder write his eyewitness account? He wrote it in two letters. So this prepositional phrase is modifying the verb “wrote”.

Now notice that “in two letters” is placed close to “the great eruption of Vesuvius”. Since prepositional phrases can also modify nouns, in choice A it seems that this modifier is actually modifying “eruption”. The modification seems to suggest that the eruption actually took place in two letters. Hence, the placement of “in two letters” is not correct in choice A.

Now let’s analyze choice E:

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

The opening modifier in this choice is correctly modifying the following main clause. It is correctly modifying that what happened in tow letters. In two letters, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote what he saw. Hence, choice E is the correct answer.

Take Away:
1. Prepositional phrases can modify both nouns and verbs.
2. First ascertain the entity the prepositional phrase should modify and then see if their placement is correct.
3. If the prepositional phrase should modify a noun entity then place it after that noun entity.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2012, 11:19

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Dudley Moore and Peter Cook not only wrote the 1960s BBC comedy "Not o 6 21 Jul 2015, 12:20
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 0 08 Sep 2016, 07:48
3 The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 6 03 Feb 2009, 23:34
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 9 20 Sep 2008, 22:31
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 3 17 Oct 2007, 16:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by