Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 00:06 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 00:06

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1174
Own Kudos [?]: 20717 [271]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [61]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [40]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Posts: 318
Own Kudos [?]: 19739 [10]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
5
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
hazelnut wrote:
The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house.

A. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house
B. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation of being haunted
C. mansion, that the mansion contained thirteen rooms, and said that it had a reputation for being haunted
D. mansion, said that it contained thirteen rooms and had a reputation for being a haunted house
E. mansion and said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted


SC14561.01


Official Explanation

Logical predication; Grammatical construction

The given sentence consists of three disjointed pieces; the second and third each begin with that. The verb recounted appropriately takes history as its object. Note that the two that-clauses that also appear, inappropriately, to be objects of the verb recount. Furthermore, the noun history and these that-clauses are not parallel.

Note that these that-clauses work better as objects of the verb said rather than the verb recount. The correct answer option will need to better integrate the two that-clauses into the sentence as a whole. A common way in which different thoughts are made into one sentence is by use of and. Choice E succeeds in creating an integrated sentence using and to combine three different thoughts.

A. In this choice, the two that-clauses inappropriately appear to be objects of the verb recount.

B. In this choice, the two that-clauses inappropriately appear to be objects of the verb recount.

C. In this choice, the first that-clause inappropriately appears to be the object of the verb recount.

D. In this choice, the referent of the pronoun it is unclear. Furthermore, had a reputation for being a haunted house is wordy and would be better phrased had the reputation of being haunted as in choice E.

E. Correct. This choice correctly uses the that-clause as the object of the verb said and uses the appropriate, less-wordy predicate had the reputation of being haunted.

The correct answer is E.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2020
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 1732 [8]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
7
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Sentence Analysis




The sentence says that the newspaper story accurately recounted three things:

1. The history of the mansion
2. The fact that the mansion contained thirteen rooms
3. The fact that the mansion had a reputation for being haunted.

There are two problems with the sentence:

1. The two “that” clauses are not parallel to the noun “history”.
2. “Mansion had a reputation for being a haunted house” can be more concisely written as “mansion had a reputation for being haunted”.

Option Analysis


A. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house
Incorrect. For the reasons mentioned above

B. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation of being haunted
Incorrect. Repeats the first problem of option A.

C. mansion, that the mansion contained thirteen rooms, and said that it had a reputation for being haunted
Incorrect. The sentence lacks parallelism. There are two lists in the sentence now: one containing two elements: “history of the colonial mansion” and “that the mansion contained thirteen rooms” and the other containing the two verbs “recounted” and “said”. In the first list, “history” and the “that” clause need to be joined by “and”. Besides, even if they are joined by “and”, the list will still be wrong since they are not parallel.

D. mansion, said that it contained thirteen rooms and had a reputation for being a haunted house
Incorrect. Since there is no “and” before “said”, in this option, there is a list of three verbs “recounted”, “said”, and “had”. The subject for verbs is “the newspaper story”. With the last verb “had”, the sentence means that the newspaper story had a reputation for being a haunted house. Clearly, a non-sense meaning.

E. mansion and said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted

Correct. There are two lists in the sentence now:
1. The first one containing the verbs “recounted” and “said”
2. The second one containing the verbs “contained” and “had”

Please note that all options in this question contain the word ‘being’, again destroying the extremely baseless myth that options with the word “being” are incorrect.

Originally posted by GMATIntensive on 18 Jul 2020, 23:04.
Last edited by GMATIntensive on 21 Jul 2020, 07:25, edited 2 times in total.
Current Student
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Status:Booth 1Y
Posts: 278
Own Kudos [?]: 1162 [6]
Given Kudos: 228
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.62
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
hazelnut wrote:
The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house.

A. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house
B. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation of being haunted
C. mansion, that the mansion contained thirteen rooms, and said that it had a reputation for being haunted
D. mansion, said that it contained thirteen rooms and had a reputation for being a haunted house
E. mansion and said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted

Both reputation for and reputation of are idiomatically correct.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/reputation

Choices (A), (B), and (C) all attempt to have a 3 piece list. What do we look for when we have lists? PARALLELISM. All three of these answer choices have very weird constructions.

The story recounted the history of x, that it contained y, and that it has a reputation.....

This list is not parallel. We have two "that's," and I'm not sure they make much sense anyway.

Eliminate (A), (B), and (C) for lack of parallelism

Between (D) and (E)...

(D) is grammatically incorrect for starting the second clause with "said." Further, there is no clear referent for the pronoun "it." Pronoun Error

(E) is kind of ugly in my opinion, but there is no firm error in the sentence. (E) avoids the use of pronouns. (E) is not in a list format, so there is no concern for parallelism. It's ugly, but it's our answer :/
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63670 [6]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Vibha6 wrote:
can we eliminate A, B, C for the usage of ', that '

As we know 'that' is not followed by a comma only 'which' is.

SC Cardinal Rule #1: Do not invent rules. :)

It's true that when we use "that" to introduce a restrictive modifier, we normally wouldn't put a comma before it. For instance:

    "The dog that relieved itself on Tim's leg is actually quite adorable."

Here, it wouldn't make any sense to put a comma before "that."

But it's not hard to come up with a scenario in which you might need a comma before "that." Here, have another example:

    "Tim believes that his children are hungry, that he should feed them, and that it would be easier to call for pizza than to whip up a casserole.

In this case, you have a list of three parallel elements, all clauses beginning with "that," so it's appropriate to separate these elements with commas.

The most glaring problem with (A), (B), and (C), is faulty parallelism. The last two elements of the list are "that" clauses, but the first element seems to be the verb "recounted." You could have three parallel verbs. You could have three parallel "that" clauses. But one verb and two "that" clauses? Not parallel. So (A), (B), and (C) are out.

The takeaway: it is theoretically possible to have a comma before "that," so if you see this construction, make sure to consider context rather than simply eliminating the answer choice.

I hope that clears things up!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [5]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
I will go with E

The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house.

A. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house---wordy("that is" is unnessasary )and illogical(a haunted houses' reputation?)
B. mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation of being haunted---same problem as A
C. mansion, that the mansion contained thirteen rooms, and said that it had a reputation for being haunted---(unpararrell)
D. mansion, said that it contained thirteen rooms and had a reputation for being a haunted house---fragment sentence/run on(The newspaper story accurately recounted.....,said that)
E. mansion and said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted---good
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63670 [4]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Will2020 wrote:
DmitryFarber wrote:
ArindamLucky

Yes, we can! None of the "that" phrases in A-D are parallel with the rest of the structure.


DmitryFarber GMATNinja is answer choice (D) a run-on sentence? If there was a comma before "and had a reputation" would it be right? Or the meaning of the sentence would still be wrong?

Thank you! :)

If we put a comma before "and had a reputation," we would seemingly have a parallel list of verbs sharing the same subject ("newspaper story"):

    "The newspaper story...
      1) accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion,
      2) said that it contained thirteen rooms,
      3) and had a reputation for being a haunted house."

Of course that doesn't make any sense: the newspaper story didn't have a reputation for being a haunted house! Even without the added comma, the lack of an "and" before "said" in choice (D) makes the reader think we are getting a parallel list of verbs that should be tied back to the same subject ("newspaper story").

The "and" before "said" in choice (E) makes the logical interpretation more clear:

    "The newspaper story...
      1) accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion
      2) and said that the mansion...
        a) contained thirteen rooms
        b) and had the reputation of being haunted."

Also, the "it" in choice (D) is a little ambiguous. That's not a deal-breaker, but (E) avoids that problem entirely. Also, the use of "for" in choice (D) isn't ideal. To help understand why, consider this example:

    "Tim has a reputation for being a real jerk."

This implies that Tim actively acts like a jerk when he interacts with people. Of course, Tim isn't ALWAYS being a real jerk. Sometimes he's just eating or sleeping or watching the Knicks play mediocre basketball. Being a real jerk is something that Tim actively does in certain situations, and presumably he could decide to STOP being a jerk, if he were so inclined. (Also, maybe he'd be nicer if the Knicks could actually win a playoff series?)

Similarly, the "for" in choice (D) seems to suggest that "being a haunted house" is something that the mansion does actively or consciously -- as if the mansion could decide to STOP being a haunted house. On the other hand, the "of" in choice (E) more accurately suggests that "being a haunted house" is a passive characteristic, not something the house can theoretically turn on and off.

That's probably not enough reason to say that the "for" is flat-out WRONG in choice (D), but it's one last small vote in favor of (E).

I hope that helps!
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
"Of being haunted" certainly does create a modifier--it modifies "reputation," telling us that kind of reputation the mansion had. However, the GMAT doesn't have any strict rule against "being" in a modifier. It just tends to use "being" to make redundant and/or poorly-constructed phrases.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4348
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [2]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
saman283 wrote:
GMATNinja, mikemcgarry

Doesn't option B use noun + noun modifier in the end?

The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation of being haunted.

My understand was that newspaper recounted the history of the mansion and that three rooms and reputation is a part of that history. So "history" is the primary thing which includes information about rooms and reputation?

Please tell me where I am going wrong.




Hello saman283,
Thank you for the query. :-)

Although your question is not for me, here is my explanation anyway. :-)

Let's first understand the meaning of the sentence. The sentence says that a particular newspaper story described the history of some colonial mansion. It also presented some details of the mansion. It had 13 rooms and was popular as a haunted house. So, it is very clear that detail about 13 rooms and the said reputation must connect with the mansion.

Now, let's take a look at Choice B. It does NOT contain a Noun + Noun Modifier. Please note that "mansion" is part of the phrase "the colonial mansion". In the structure, "that it contained...", "that" is NOT a noun modifier. It is a connector that is connecting the following clause with the preceding clause. This connection is ungrammatical.

Choice E through the correct structure. It correctly and clearly says that the newspaper story recounted the history of the mansion and said that the mansion contained 13 rooms and had a certain reputation.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [2]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
ArindamLucky wrote:
egmat wrote:
AyeeshaJ wrote:
Hey @e-gmat, can you explain two things here please:

1) Use of of being and for being
2) Option E violates that that parallelism.




Hello AyeeshaJ,
Sincere apologies for the late revert.

1) It is not about the phrase of being and for being. The phrases that we need to consider are reputation of and reputation for. Now, the usage of being is correct in the sentence because it has been used as a verb-ing noun word.


2) There is no parallelism violation in Choice E with the omission of that before the verb had. The subject the mansion has two verbs - contained and had. These two verbs are properly connected by the connector and. The parallelism is maintained here.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha



Can we say that the usage of ,that is wrong and eliminate the options?


Egmat, Could you advise on the option D.
I uderstand in terms of sentence structure . OPtion D is wrong but few posts question the Pronoun " IT" also as an error.
My query, IT can refer to story or Mansion. But it doesnot make sense if replace IT with story thus pronoun IT must refer to only mansion thus IT is not error here.
IS my understanding right?
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
BansalT

We can be sure that "that" in A-C does not mean mansion, since in each case it is followed by IT or THE MANSION. We're not likely to have 3 wrong answers that are basically saying "the mansion the mansion." That would be too much of a giveaway.

Unfortunately for us, THAT has a wide range of uses. When we see THAT after a verb, it is extending the clause to include a new subject and verb. For instance, if I say "She told me that the store was closing," THAT allows me to attach a new subject-verb pair ("the store was") to the existing clause. So if we give A its best chance, it is saying that the story recounted 3 things: 1) the history of the mansion, 2) that it contained 13 rooms, and 3) that it had a reputation for being a haunted house. However, this isn't great parallel structure--we're trying to make the facts in 2&3 parallel to a simple verb in 1. Also, we don't really "recount" facts (we recount stories), so 2&3 don't make much sense. Let me know if I can clarify any of that! :)
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4348
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [2]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
capsguy2018 wrote:
Hello!

In option E is there an issue with with the two "and". Is a comma not required?

Also, in a case with two separate ands do we need to check for parallelism?

Thanks



Hey capsguy2018

Happy to help you with this.

Such questions test the Core Skill of being able to visualize the Structure of Sentences, particularly complex sentences such as choice E. This skill, if mastered, can help you identify grammatical and structural errors with ease. Allow me to demonstrate:

E: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion and said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted.

Sentence Structure:

    o The newspaper story accurately

      o recounted the history of the colonial mansion and

      o said that the mansion

        o contained thirteen rooms and

        o had the reputation of being haunted.

Now, as you can see from the above, there are two separate lists in this sentence. The first list contains the two verbs of the subject "story": "recounted" and "said". The second list contains the two verb of the subject "mansion": "contained" and "had".

So, each of these lists contain only two entities.

Now, as per the Oxford Comma Rule, we need to place a comma before "and" in lists of three entities or more, and not in a list of only two entities.

This is why choice E does not have a comma error.



Coming to your second question:

Parallelism needs to be maintained between entities within one list. For instance, in Choice E, the verbs "recounted" and "said" are parallel because they are part of the same list. On the other hand, the verbs "contained" and "had" are parallel because they are part of the same list. But, the verbs "recounted" and "said" are not parallel to the verbs "contained" and "had". This is because they are not part of the same list.


I hope this response helps you understand parallelism and the core skill of identifying the structure of complex sentences.


Happy Learning!

Abhishek
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Saupayan

The simple answer for this question is that all of the answers with "reputation for" can be eliminated for structural reasons before we even get to that idiom. Does that mean "reputation for" is wrong? No, not necessarily. There are cases in which it would work, although I'd usually expect it to be followed by a noun, as in your example ("customer service"). Your OF example could work, too, if we move "bad" in front of "customer service."

The first one means "Company X has a bad reputation. In what way? For its customer service."
The second one, as written, means "Company X's reputation of customer service is bad." We don't normally express things this way, rating someone's "reputation of X." So what happens when we move BAD? "Company X has a reputation of bad customer service." Now we're saying that company X has a reputation. What kind? They're known to have bad customer service. This form is okay.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
-Of being and for being - are not modifiers. Being is a gerund in this context and acts as the objet of the prepositions and therefore acceptable.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4348
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [1]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
AyeeshaJ wrote:
Hey @e-gmat, can you explain two things here please:

1) Use of of being and for being
2) Option E violates that that parallelism.




Hello AyeeshaJ,
Sincere apologies for the late revert.

1) It is not about the phrase of being and for being. The phrases that we need to consider are reputation of and reputation for. Now, the usage of being is correct in the sentence because it has been used as a verb-ing noun word.


2) There is no parallelism violation in Choice E with the omission of that before the verb had. The subject the mansion has two verbs - contained and had. These two verbs are properly connected by the connector and. The parallelism is maintained here.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [1]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
sakshiagarwal96 wrote:
EMPOWERgmatVerbal, I don't understand how 'that' in option A acts as an object for the verb 'recount'

Posted from my mobile device


Thanks for the question, sakshiagarwal96. The word "that" isn't the object for the verb "recount" - it's a preposition. If we look at option A, we can see that there are 3 phrases that act as objects for the verb "recounted":

The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial mansion, that it contained thirteen rooms, and that it had a reputation for being a haunted house.

The 3 items in orange are the "objective phrases" that give us more information about what the story "recounted." The word "that" is just part of each phrase. The reason option A is wrong is that it misuses the phrase "had a reputation for being." The rest of it was pretty much fine as is.

I hope this helps! Feel free to tag EMPOWERgmatVerbal if you have any other questions!
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Vibha6 wrote:
can we eliminate A, B, C for the usage of ', that '

As we know 'that' is not followed by a comma only 'which' is.


Hello Vibha6,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

In this case, A, B, and C can indeed be eliminated for the incorrect use of "comma + that" construction.

However, "comma + that" is not incorrect in all circumstances. In rare cases, "that" can be preceded by a comma, and in these cases, "that" does not refer to the noun/phrase immediately before the comma; rather, it refers to the noun/phrase immediately before a preceding comma.

To understand the concept of the rare case when "That" is preceded by "Comma", you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Eshangupta1211 wrote:
Option E has a part: said that the mansion contained thirteen rooms and had the reputation of being haunted

contained is the verb ed modifier for mansion and the after "and", we have "had the reputation", which has a verb. Can these two parts be connected by and. Logically, this makes sense, but can a modifier and verb form be connected in this manner

Hi Eshan, "contained" is used as a verb here and not as a past participle.

Hence, contained is grammatically parallel to the verb had.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses how to differentiate between "Simple Past Tense verbs" and "Past Participles". If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
GMAT Club Bot
The newspaper story accurately recounted the history of the colonial [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne