Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 00:27 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 00:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ProfChaos
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Dec 2020
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 120
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ProfChaos
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Dec 2020
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 120
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
historyfan10
Joined: 06 Sep 2020
Last visit: 17 Dec 2020
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ProfChaos
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Dec 2020
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 120
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
historyfan10
Hello,

I think this question is biased. Usually, GMAT DC questions should be consistent in the statements. This means they should not lead to two different solutions as it is the case here with the two different possibilities for x.

There are GMAT DC questions in which St1. leads to two values of the variable and St.2 leads to two values and even when both the statements are combined, there is no common case, in those cases, choice E is the correct choice and there are questions where a combination of statements has narrowed the value down to the common case, in those cases, answer choice C is the correct choice

I hope you have come across both the above type of scenarios.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,921
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,908
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,921
Kudos: 811,485
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ProfChaos
historyfan10
Hello,

I think this question is biased. Usually, GMAT DC questions should be consistent in the statements. This means they should not lead to two different solutions as it is the case here with the two different possibilities for x.

There are GMAT DC questions in which St1. leads to two values of the variable and St.2 leads to two values and even when both the statements are combined, there is no common case, in those cases, choice E is the correct choice and there are questions where a combination of statements has narrowed the value down to the common case, in those cases, answer choice C is the correct choice

I hope you have come across both the above type of scenarios.

That's not correct.

On the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.

So, for example, we cannot have y = 1 from statement (1) and y = 5 from statement (2), as in this case statements would contradict each other.

Or for example in YES/NO DS questions we cannot have answer YES from statement (1) and answer NO from statement (2), as in this case statements also would contradict each other.

So, the above question is flawed.
User avatar
ProfChaos
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Dec 2020
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 120
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
ProfChaos
historyfan10
Hello,

I think this question is biased. Usually, GMAT DC questions should be consistent in the statements. This means they should not lead to two different solutions as it is the case here with the two different possibilities for x.

There are GMAT DC questions in which St1. leads to two values of the variable and St.2 leads to two values and even when both the statements are combined, there is no common case, in those cases, choice E is the correct choice and there are questions where a combination of statements has narrowed the value down to the common case, in those cases, answer choice C is the correct choice

I hope you have come across both the above type of scenarios.

That's not correct.

On the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.

So, for example, we cannot have y = 1 from statement (1) and y = 5 from statement (2), as in this case statements would contradict each other.

Or for example in YES/NO DS questions we cannot have answer YES from statement (1) and answer NO from statement (2), as in this case statements also would contradict each other.

So, the above question is flawed.

I agree with what Bunuel said.
On solving St1 and St2, values shouldnt contradict each other.

But Bunuel, help me with the below example,

Question: Find value of x
St.1: Quadratic eqn of x of degree 2 --> on solving we get two values of x (let x=3/-2) --> insufficient
St.2: Quadratic eqn of x of degree 2 --> on solving we get two values of x (let x=5/3) --> insufficient

Now A/B/D are not our answer choices
So, we combine both statements and check if C is correct, else E would be the answer.
On combining both statements, we get a value for x. i.e x=3
Hence correct answer choice is C
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,921
Own Kudos:
811,485
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,908
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,921
Kudos: 811,485
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ProfChaos
Bunuel
ProfChaos

That's not correct.

On the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other.

So, for example, we cannot have y = 1 from statement (1) and y = 5 from statement (2), as in this case statements would contradict each other.

Or for example in YES/NO DS questions we cannot have answer YES from statement (1) and answer NO from statement (2), as in this case statements also would contradict each other.

So, the above question is flawed.

I agree with what Bunuel said.
On solving St1 and St2, values shouldnt contradict each other.

But Bunuel, help me with the below example,

Question: Find value of x
St.1: Quadratic eqn of x of degree 2 --> on solving we get two values of x (let x=3/-2) --> insufficient
St.2: Quadratic eqn of x of degree 2 --> on solving we get two values of x (let x=5/3) --> insufficient

Now A/B/D are not our answer choices
So, we combine both statements and check if C is correct, else E would be the answer.
On combining both statements, we get a value for x. i.e x=3
Hence correct answer choice is C


CASE 1:
From (1) x = 3 or x = -2
From (2) x = 3 or x = 5

When considering together x = 3. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


CASE 2:
From (1) x = 3 or x = -2
From (2) x = 1 or x = 5

The question is flawed. The statements contradict each other.

CASE 3:
From (1) x = 3 or x = -2 or x= 7
From (2) x = 3 or x = 5 or x= 7

When considering together x = 3 or x = 7. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
109921 posts
498 posts
212 posts