Here's the
official explanation provided by the GMAC for this question:
According to the sentence, the number of mountain gorillas is declining so quickly that the population in 1980 was half that in 1960. The verb form
is declining indicates that the decline continues at the present time. However, the decline in population between 1960 and 1980 is reported as having already occurred, so the verb in the highlighted portion of the sentence should be in a past tense. To convey the intended meaning, the sentence must clearly compare the population in 1960 with the population in 1980. The wording should be concise.
Option A: The phrase
with such rapidity is an unnecessarily wordy substitute for
so rapidly. The present tense
is does not convey the intended past-tense meaning. The phrase
the population is one-half in the twenty years is incoherent; it does not say what the population is one-half of, and thus does not convey the intended sense of the population decline.
Option B: The phrase
with such rapidity is an unnecessarily wordy substitute for
so rapidly. The phrase
the population was one-half in the twenty years is incoherent; it does not say when the population was one-half of what, and thus does not convey the intended sense of the population decline.
Option C: The phrase
the population divided in half confusingly suggests that the population of mountain gorillas separated into two groups, whereas the sentence's more likely intended meaning is that the number of mountain gorillas declined. The phrase
so rapidly the population divided could be misread as meaning
so the population rapidly divided.Option D: Correct. This concise wording clearly conveys the intended sense of the population declining between 1960 and 1980. The past tense
was is appropriate to the meaning. The use of
that clarifies that
rapidly modifies
declining rather than
was;
so rapidly …that introduces a clause indicating a consequence of the rapidity.
Option E: The phrase
in such rapidity is not only unnecessarily wordy but also idiomatically incorrect; the correct preposition would be
with, not
in. The present tense
is conveys neither the past-tense meaning of the clause nor the sense of a decline over time.
The correct answer is D.
Please note that I'm not the author of this explanation. I'm just posting it here since I believe it can help the community.