Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
02 Dec 2019, 23:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
53% (01:40) correct
47%
(01:51)
wrong
based on 441
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The owners of a fast growing tech start-up in Newport Beach organized the firm as a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The owners receive considerable personal liability protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation.
(A) protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(B) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(C) protection from potential lawsuits, avoiding some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(D) protection from potential lawsuits, and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
(E) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
03 Dec 2019, 01:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
subjunctive type
IMO E is correct
protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
The owners of a fast growing tech start-up in Newport Beach organized the firm as a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The owners receive considerable personal liability [url]protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation.[/url]
(A) protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(B) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(C) protection from potential lawsuits, avoiding some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(D) protection from potential lawsuits, and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
(E) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
IMO E is correct
protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
The owners of a fast growing tech start-up in Newport Beach organized the firm as a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The owners receive considerable personal liability [url]protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation.[/url]
(A) protection from potential lawsuits, and they also avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(B) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(C) protection from potential lawsuits, avoiding some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company was set up as a C-corporation
(D) protection from potential lawsuits, and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
(E) protection from potential lawsuits and avoid some egregious double-taxation that would occur if the company were set up as a C-corporation
03 Dec 2019, 03:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer is E for using the subjunctive conditional 'were' and 'would occur'.
