The pioneering research of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, who became

Question

The pioneering research  of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, who became known for his invention of the light bulb,  accelerated the development of the first power plant, which opened in New York City in 1882.

A. of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, who became known for his invention of the light bulb,

B. of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, known for his invention of the light bulb,

C. of Thomas Edison, known for his invention of the light bulb, and Lewis Latimer

D. of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison became known for his invention of the light bulb and

E. that was conducted by Thomas Edison, who became known for his invention of the light bulb, and Lewis Latimer

Source: Carcass_Souvik_Meaning SC

Sajjad1994 · Accepted Answer

Official Explanation

In the original sentence, the pronoun “his” lacks a clear antecedent, making it unclear whether it was “Lewis Latimer” or “Thomas Edison” who “became known for his invention of the light bulb.” In fact, the plural phrase "Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison" leads us to expect a plural pronoun later on; if we only wish to refer to "Thomas Edison," we should position the modifying phrase so as to refer to "Thomas Edison" only.

Also, the construction “who became known for his invention” is wordy and could be replaced by the more concise form “known for his invention.”

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) This answer choice replaces the wordy construction “who became known for his invention” with the more concise form “known for his invention,” but retains the original ambiguity stemming from the lack of a clear antecedent for the pronoun “his.”

(C) CORRECT. By placing the modifier “known for his invention of the light bulb” immediately after “Thomas Edison” and prior to the introduction of “Lewis Latimer,” this answer choice resolves the original ambiguity and makes it clear that the pronoun “his” refers to “Thomas Edison” rather than “Lewis Latimer.” The construction “known for his invention” is also more concise than the original form “who became known for his invention.”

(D) This answer choice illogically states that it was the “pioneering research” rather than “Thomas Edison” that became “known for his invention of the light bulb,” thus altering the original meaning of the sentence. Further, this answer choice retains the original problem of ambiguity by failing to provide a clear antecedent for the pronoun “his.”

(E) This answer choice uses the passive construction “research that was conducted by Thomas Edison” rather than the more direct and concise form “research of Thomas Edison.” Further, while the placement of the modifier “who became known for his invention of the light bulb” next to Thomas Edison and prior to the introduction of “Lewis Latimer” resolves the ambiguity, the phrase “who became known for his invention” is wordy; the more concise form “known for his invention” is preferable.

Answer: C

aditya8062 · Answer

C seems best here:   of Thomas Edison, known for his invention of the light bulb, and Lewis Latimer

faults in bold :
of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison,  who became known for his invention of the light bulb ,
• of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison,  known for his invention of the light bulb ,------------> if you want to describe something about "Thomas Edison" then this construction is inferior to the one used in option C  
• of Thomas Edison, known for his invention of the light bulb, and Lewis Latimer
• of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison  became known for his invention of the light bulb  and
• that was conducted by Thomas Edison,  who became known  for his invention of the light bulb, and Lewis Latimer

"known for his invention"  is better construction that  "who became known"

Abhishek009 · Answer

The pioneering research  of Thomas Edison,  known for his invention of the light bulb  and Lewis Latimer,  accelerated the development of the first power plant ,  which  opened in New York City in 1882.

Correct answer must be (C) for the highlighted errors in the options...

Bounce1987 · Answer

Please help me understand why options A and B are wrong and option C is right.

sayantanc2k · Answer

2 Errors in each of the options A and B:

1. The modifier ("who became known for his invention of the light bulb" in A / "known for his invention of the light bulb" in B) may wrongly refer to both Latimer and Edison.

2. It is not clear whom the pronoun "his" refers to, Latimer or Edison.

Radheya · Answer

Dear experts,
Can you explain why should I choose option C over E? 
IMO, option C says research of Thomas Edison + modifier + and latimar accelerated the development. Isn't it non-sensical to say that? I mean, the research  of a person  accelerated the the development? or it should be research + by someone which accelerated the development?

Because of the above confusion I marked option E.
 daagh   GMATNinja   sayantanc2k

NinetyFour · Answer

Writing "research of Thomas Edison" sounds like someone was researching thomas edison. That doesn't make much sense does it. Could you elaborate on the meaning of this sentence?

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

In this case, "the research of Thomas Edison" is meant to convey a meaning similar to that conveyed by "Thomas Edison's research."

While the interpretation that you have suggested would perhaps make sense in a different context, the context in which the wording "research of Thomas Edison" appears in this sentence indicates that the wording is not meant to convey that the research was about Thomas Edison but rather that the research belonged to or was possessed by Thomas Edison.

This advantage of using the "the research of" structure is that it allows conciseness and allows for the placement of the modifier "known for the invention of the light bulb" directly after "Thomas Edison."

If the sentence were to use "Thomas Edison's research" and "Lewis Latimer's research," it would be repetitive and less concise, and indicating that Thomas Edison is known for the invention of the light bulb would be challenging.

NinetyFour · Answer

Wouldn't it be much more clear if it was written as E in that case? It is perfect clear in E that the research was conducted BY thomas edison, not on thomas edison

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

I find (C) to be sufficiently clear. That it is is just my take.

At the same time, I don't find anything particularly wrong with (E), and perhaps what you are really asking is what to do should you, when taking the GMAT, run into a choice like the choice between (C) and (E). The answer to that question is that there is almost no chance that you will have to make such a choice. The wrong answers in the SC questions on the actual GMAT will be more clearly wrong than is choice (E), which has no clear issues.

prescott · Answer

My understanding is that a relative pronoun mustn't follow a comma (or possibly leading within a comma pair) -- is this correct?

And because of this, having "known" leading within the comma pair is a better choice than "who." Thus, A is incorrect.

AjiteshArun · Answer

That's not a silly question at all. In fact, I see a lot of people using the same "rule" here on GMAT club. The thing to keep in mind (this is not specific to this question) is that there is no such rule. That is, this kind of  who  may or may not refer to the noun immediately before it. This is not to say that we shouldn't check a  who / that / which  if we see it in an option. It's just that we should not assume that a relative pronoun will  always  refer to the noun just before it.

gvij2017 · Answer

This is what I was searching. 
Ah! finally I met someone who is thinking in my way. 
I also have same doubt.

The research of Thomas Edison.....seems weird, isn't it?
Is someone is researching Thomas. I think it would be better if sentence were that "the research  by  Thomas...."

Please let me know if I am wrong.

AjiteshArun · Answer

Hi  gvij2017 ,

You're not wrong, but  research of  can be used  both  ways.  The research of XYZ  could mean either  research  into  XYZ  or  research  conducted by  XYZ .

mSKR · Answer

can't we reject C because it gives different meaning than E over what is known for his invention
read it again: 
The pioneering research  of Thomas Edison , known for his invention of the light bulb

But E has no such ambiguity.

2. of is not repeated after "and" . it could give parallelism error : research and Lewis in parallel which is WRONG

please suggest

sayantanc2k   MartyTargetTestPrep   AjiteshArun   daagh   GMATNinja   egmat

CrackverbalGMAT · Answer

Hi,

The commas are separating the modifier "known for his invention of the light bulb" from the rest of the sentence. Without the commas, the modifier would look out of place. The second comma is as necessary as the one just before 'known'.

The confusion probably arises because the conjunction (joining word) 'and' is present immediately after the modifier. However, the conjunction 'and' has been used to connect the nouns Thomas Edison and Lewis Latimer. The modifier is just an extra piece of information in between that gives us some information about Thomas Edison, and therefore has to be separated from the rest of the sentence with commas.

I hope this helps:)

Jayanthi Kumar.

AjiteshArun · Answer

Hi  itsSKR ,

You may want to also tag one or more Manhattan instructors on this one. For what it's worth,  research of {someone}  is quite common, and I wouldn't consider it a major problem.

As for the  of : Keeping the  of  outside the  Y  in  of X and Y  helps to convey the meaning that this was a  collaboration  between  X  and  Y . If we instead went with  of X and of Y , we might think that  X  and  Y  worked independently (compare  the research of  X  and  Y   with  the research  of X  and  of Y  ). It's good that the question doesn't ask us to take that kind of call though.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

The pioneering research of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, who became

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

The pioneering research of Lewis Latimer and Thomas Edison, who became

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards