Aishna1034
Thought about this with some different perspective: Winters because is harsh, with temperatures near to freezing point, rodents tend to be in large groups(maybe being in a gp giving each other's company ,or being close keeps them warm) which can be deduced from D. On the other hand, E says that snakes active from spring to autumn, still gp strength is low, sounding like a weakener. Could you please help things clarify? @MartyMurray @ Karishma B.
Aishna1034 I'll add my two cents- Looking at your analysis, I can see why you're confused - you're thinking creatively about why voles might group together, but that's actually leading you away from the correct answer. Let me help clarify the key issue here.
Your reasoning about option D (voles huddling for warmth) is logical in the real world, but it's not what the argument is claiming. The argument specifically states that the group size variation is caused by
"seasonal variation in mortality among young voles." We need evidence that
young voles die more in certain seasons, not alternative explanations for grouping behavior.
Why Option E is the Strengthener (Not a Weakener)Let me trace the logical chain for you:
- Spring through early autumn: Snakes are active → They prey on young voles → Young voles die → Groups become smaller
- Late autumn through winter: Snakes are inactive → Young voles survive → Groups remain large (includes multiple litters as mentioned)
Option E directly provides the
mechanism for why young vole mortality varies by season, which perfectly explains the group size pattern.
Why Option D Doesn't WorkOption D tells us winters are harsh, but:
- It doesn't mention
mortality of young voles specifically
- It suggests an
alternative explanation (temperature-based grouping) rather than supporting the given explanation
- Even if cold kills voles, it would affect all voles, not specifically the young
Here is a framework that you can follow while approaching Strengthen questions:- If the conclusion states a specific cause → Look for answer that provides evidence of that exact cause
- If the conclusion is about a mechanism → Find answer that shows how the mechanism works
- Avoid answers that provide alternative explanations (they actually weaken!)
Key Takeaway: In GMAT CR, stick to what the argument claims. Don't add outside knowledge or alternative theories - support the
exact explanation given.