1. Which of the following captures the primary purpose of the passage?
A. To explain a recent scientific analysis while analyzing some important implications of its findingsCorrectB. To establish how a prevailing scientific theory is no longer validIncorrect: Inconsistent
This choice is too extreme. The author never discards the prevailing theory. He/She instead recommends that in the light of the new findings, major revisions need to be made to the existing models of Moon formation.
C. To discuss two competing theories regarding a scientific phenomenonIncorrect: Out of Scope
There are no two competing theories about Moon formation. As stated in the explanation for choice B, the analysis mentioned in the passage has implications for the existing theory.
D. To present the details of a recent scientific analysis and its findingsIncorrect: Partial Scope
Yes, the author indeed does so but in the final paragraph, the author even analyzes the implications of the analysis. Hence, this choice fails to capture the essence of the entire passage.
E. To question the outcome of a recent finding Incorrect: Out of Scope
The author never doubts the findings of the analysis. The impact of the findings is explored in the passage.
2. The passage states which of the following?
A. The oldest terrestrial minerals can be said to be at least 4.36 billion years old.Incorrect: Inconsistent
The passage says that the age of the FAN sample is similar to that of the oldest terrestrial minerals. This means that these minerals can be said to be around (accounting for a few years younger or older than this number) 4.36 billion years old. However, this choice says that they are at least these many years old, implying that they could be older but not younger than 4.36 billion years.
B. In the recent analysis, more than one dating mechanism was applied to the FAN sample.CorrectThis information is explicitly given to us in the following section of the passage (last para- 1st sentence):. This study is the first in which a single sample of FAN yielded consistent ages from multiple isotope dating techniques.
C. A significant amount of more research is required before anything certain can be concluded regarding the age of the FAN samples.Incorrect: Opposite
The statement made in this choice goes against the following contents of the passage:. This study is the first in which a single sample of FAN yielded consistent ages from multiple isotope dating techniques. This result strongly suggests that these ages pinpoint the time at which this sample crystallized.
D. Zircons from Western Australia corroborated the age of the FAN sample.Incorrect: Inconsistent
The similarity between the age of the zircons and FAN sample points towards the conclusion that the oldest crust on both Earth and Moon formed at approximately the same time and not that the zircons helped establish the age of the FAN samples in the first place.
E. Terrestrial contamination often occurs in samples brought from space.Incorrect: Out of Scope
We know that there was terrestrial contamination in the sample studies but there is no given information regarding how often such contamination occurs.
3. The passage supports which of the following statements?
A. In the light of the analysis done on the FAN sample, it is possible that ferroan anorthosite is not a light mineral.Incorrect: Out of Scope
We are told that it is possible that the FAN sample does not belong to the original magma that cooled down to form the Moon, meaning that it is not a part of the ancient crust of the Moon as it was thought to be. This ancient crust was formed of the lightest minerals in the magma. However, if the sample itself does not represent the magma, no conclusion can be drawn regarding its weight properties. Also, this choice says “light” mineral, which is an absolute judgment; the passage makes a comparison between the minerals on the crust and other minerals in the magma.
B. If the Moon was indeed formed 4.36 billion years ago, then the age of the solar system itself needs to be reconsidered.Incorrect: Inconsistent
The passage says that if the Moon was formed at a stage later than 4.567 billion years ago, the age of the solar system, then existing models of Moon formation need to be revised. However, the finding has no stated implication for the age of the solar system itself.
C. The fact that the moon was not formed at a much later stage than generally believed does not affect the requirement for significant changes in the existing theory of Moon formation.CorrectThis statement can be inferred from the author’s analysis of the implications of the findings. Please refer to the relevant section below:
The extraordinarily young age of this lunar sample either means that the Moon solidified significantly later than previous estimates -- and therefore the moon itself is much younger than previously believed -- or that this sample does not represent a crystallization product of the original magma ocean. Either scenario requires major revision to existing models for the formation of the Moon.
D. A consistent result from multiple isotope dating techniques had never been achieved in any field before the mentioned study on the FAN sample.Incorrect: Out of Scope
There is no information given to conclude anything about the application of these dating techniques in other fields.
E. Since the Apollo 16 mission in 1972, scientists have not been able to obtain more samples from the Moon’s crust.Incorrect: Out of Scope
There is no information given in the passage to support any inference about other scientific missions.