SidKaria
The explanation of this question says that both "to disclose,to provide ,and to create" and "to disclose,provide ,and create" are correct.
While in this case, both are correct, but we cannot have a
blanket rule that in
every case, we can remove the
preposition, and the sentence would still be correct. For example:
i)
Rahul is as comfortable with Shoaib as with Shane Warne.
The above sentence is
not the same, when the second preposition
with is removed:
ii)
Rahul is as comfortable with Shoaib as Shane Warne.
Statement ii) has two interpretations:
a)
Rahul is as comfortable with Shoaib as (Rahul is comfortable with) Shane Warneb)
Rahul is as comfortable with Shoaib as Shane Warne (is comfortable with Shoaib)Coming on to this question, I would agree that there does not seem to be an explicit need of repeating the
of with
spontaneously grasping, since there does not seem to be any ambiguity in the sentence. However, if you notice, there is another preposition
in before
spontaneously grasping, and so, by repeating
of, the sentence just becomes very easy and unambiguous to read.
Also, I noticed that none of the posters above pointed out that D uses the incorect idiomatic construct
considered as. The correct idiom is just
considered.