Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Strengthen: Fleeing from Iranian army, the armed dissidents in Iran have made their strongholds near Fereydoon Kenar
Weaken: The Indian government has initiated tough measures to roll back incursions into the cranes' breeding grounds
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the radio buttons below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
18%
(02:02)
correct 82%
(02:38)
wrong
based on 207
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus), also known as the Siberian white crane or the Snow crane, is a bird of the family Gruidae, the cranes. It is a long-distance migrant and among the cranes, makes the longest migrations. The species spends its winters in Fereydoon Kenar in Iran and Keoladeo National Park, India.
Due to increased human activity and encroachment in Keoladeo National Park, migration patterns of Siberian cranes have been affected. Their nesting sites have been encroached upon and the breeding rate is declining. With Iran struggling with its own population explosion, very soon we will see a decline in the breeding in Iran also.
Select the additional information that, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn and select the additional information that, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn. Make only two selections, one in each column
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Strengthen
Weaken
Fleeing from Iranian army, the armed dissidents in Iran have made their strongholds near Fereydoon Kenar
The cranes have been migrating further south of Fereydoon Kenar towards the inhospitable desert.
The Iranian government has announced a cash reward for those who capture armed poachers of wildlife.
The Indian government has initiated tough measures to roll back incursions into the cranes' breeding grounds
Siberian cranes from East Siberia have lately been interbreeding with Siberian cranes from West Siberia.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the radio buttons above and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
This one is really a Critical Reasoning question wearing a Data Insights costume, and I think that's exactly why it trips people up on the Focus exam. Once you see it that way it gets a lot easier.
The conclusion is basically that Iran is heading toward the same decline in Siberian crane breeding that India already went through, because of rising human pressure near the breeding grounds.
For strengthen, you want something that adds a new source of human pressure specifically in Iran, mirroring what happened in India. Option 1 does exactly that, armed dissidents setting up strongholds near Fereydoon Kenar is a fresh, direct threat to the exact breeding area in question. That strengthens the prediction of decline.
For weaken, you want something that shows Iran is actually protecting the cranes rather than losing ground to human encroachment. Option 3 does that, a government cash reward for capturing poachers is a concrete protective measure working in the opposite direction of the conclusion.
Now the traps, and I definitely paused on these. Option 4 is about India, not Iran, so even though it sounds thematically related it does not touch the actual conclusion about Iran's future. Option 5 is about interbreeding between East and West Siberian cranes, which is a totally separate issue from human encroachment and does not move the argument either way.
Takeaway: on these strengthen and weaken pairs, always go back and check which country or group the conclusion is actually about, GMAT loves to hand you an answer that is true and relevant sounding but aimed at the wrong subject.
This one is really a Critical Reasoning question wearing a Data Insights costume, and I think that's exactly why it trips people up on the Focus exam. Once you see it that way it gets a lot easier.
The conclusion is basically that Iran is heading toward the same decline in Siberian crane breeding that India already went through, because of rising human pressure near the breeding grounds.
For strengthen, you want something that adds a new source of human pressure specifically in Iran, mirroring what happened in India. Option 1 does exactly that, armed dissidents setting up strongholds near Fereydoon Kenar is a fresh, direct threat to the exact breeding area in question. That strengthens the prediction of decline.
For weaken, you want something that shows Iran is actually protecting the cranes rather than losing ground to human encroachment. Option 3 does that, a government cash reward for capturing poachers is a concrete protective measure working in the opposite direction of the conclusion.
Now the traps, and I definitely paused on these. Option 4 is about India, not Iran, so even though it sounds thematically related it does not touch the actual conclusion about Iran's future. Option 5 is about interbreeding between East and West Siberian cranes, which is a totally separate issue from human encroachment and does not move the argument either way.
Takeaway: on these strengthen and weaken pairs, always go back and check which country or group the conclusion is actually about, GMAT loves to hand you an answer that is true and relevant sounding but aimed at the wrong subject.
Please provide your expert views in order to solve this question
arunbhati
The Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus), also known as the Siberian white crane or the Snow crane, is a bird of the family Gruidae, the cranes. It is a long-distance migrant and among the cranes, makes the longest migrations. The species spends its winters in Fereydoon Kenar in Iran and Keoladeo National Park, India.
Due to increased human activity and encroachment in Keoladeo National Park, migration patterns of Siberian cranes have been affected. Their nesting sites have been encroached upon and the breeding rate is declining. With Iran struggling with its own population explosion, very soon we will see a decline in the breeding in Iran also.
Select the additional information that, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn and select the additional information that, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn. Make only two selections, one in each column
The answer to the weaken question doesn't address the conclusion, which mainly points to the decline in breeding rate in Iran, but the answer chosen is the one about changes in India, which doesn't address the conclusion of the argument. The better answer could've been either the 2nd choice or the 3rd, which follows up with the conclusion.
You've spotted something real: the conclusion is about Iran ("very soon we will see a decline in the breeding in Iran also"). But look at why the author believes that. The prediction isn't based on anything happening in Iran yet - it's an analogy.
The logic runs like this: - In India, human encroachment hit the nesting sites → breeding declined. - Iran is facing a population explosion (its own encroachment pressure). - Therefore Iran will follow the same path India did.
The whole forecast leans on one hidden assumption: that once encroachment starts, a breeding decline is basically inevitable and unstoppable - that's the only reason India's story tells us anything about Iran's future.
That's the crack Option 4 exploits. By showing India has rolled back the incursions and is reversing the damage, it says the trend is not inevitable - encroachment can be halted. If the India precedent can be reversed, the "it happened there, so it'll happen here" bridge collapses. So the Iran prediction loses its support. That's a genuine weaken, even though the fact itself is about India - it attacks the reasoning, not the location.
Why Option 3 doesn't do the job: the argument's mechanism is encroachment / human activity squeezing nesting sites. Option 3 is about rewarding people who capture poachers - a different threat entirely, and it doesn't touch the population-explosion pressure the conclusion rests on.
Why Option 2 fails: cranes drifting toward inhospitable desert is ambiguous - if anything it hints at more trouble, not less, so it doesn't weaken the predicted decline.
Quick habit to build: when a conclusion is a prediction by analogy, you can weaken it either by attacking the new case or by breaking the analogy itself. Undermining the premise that the pattern must repeat is often the sharpest weaken available.
Answer: Column 1 = Fleeing from Iranian army, the armed dissidents in Iran have made their strongholds near Fereydoon Kenar; Column 2 = The Indian government has initiated tough measures to roll back incursions into the cranes' breeding grounds
Karanrev
The answer to the weaken question doesn't address the conclusion, which mainly points to the decline in breeding rate in Iran, but the answer chosen is the one about changes in India, which doesn't address the conclusion of the argument. The better answer could've been either the 2nd choice or the 3rd, which follows up with the conclusion.
Show more
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.