Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 04:56 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 04:56
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,414
Own Kudos:
778,486
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,414
Kudos: 778,486
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common 21 Apr 2025, 00:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

77% (01:44) correct 23% (01:53) wrong based on 98 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common practice. However, the introduction of commercial interests into a sport often leads to reforms in that sport such as changes to the design of uniforms, to the duration of games, and even to the actual rules. For this reason, traditional views are in opposition to the involvement of corporations in sports. Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.

(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators


­
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
Dereno
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 750
Own Kudos:
746
 [1]
Given Kudos: 374
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 750
Kudos: 746
 [1]
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common 21 Apr 2025, 12:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common practice. However, the introduction of commercial interests into a sport often leads to reforms in that sport such as changes to the design of uniforms, to the duration of games, and even to the actual rules. For this reason, traditional views are in opposition to the involvement of corporations in sports. Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.

(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators


­
Show more
The bone of contention is between corporate sponsoring of sports and those whose support traditional view of sports. The traditionalist see change in uniforms, duration and rules were infused in with the advent of corporate funding.

Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.

Lets look into the options.

(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

Corporates being democratically responsible is no where mentioned in the passage. Out of scope.

(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

This clearly states that without the funding, the game would have ceased to exist. The existence of the game becomes questionable ( long lasting subsistence). Hence, correct answer.

(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

This may or may not be true. As government or NGOs would have stepped in to promote the game at a larger level. Hence, eliminating it.

(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

Character of the game is no where questioned, hence out of scope.

(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators

Irrelevant option. Hence eliminating it.
User avatar
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common 22 Apr 2025, 03:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is B.
Long term sustenance trumps everything.
Bunuel
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common practice. However, the introduction of commercial interests into a sport often leads to reforms in that sport such as changes to the design of uniforms, to the duration of games, and even to the actual rules. For this reason, traditional views are in opposition to the involvement of corporations in sports. Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.

(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators


­
Show more
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,414
Own Kudos:
778,486
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,414
Kudos: 778,486
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common 04 May 2025, 10:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common practice. However, the introduction of commercial interests into a sport often leads to reforms in that sport such as changes to the design of uniforms, to the duration of games, and even to the actual rules. For this reason, traditional views are in opposition to the involvement of corporations in sports. Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.

(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators
Show more

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The sponsoring of bodies that govern sports by companies is a common practice. However, the introduction of commercial interests into a sport often leads to reforms in that sport such as changes to the design of uniforms, to the duration of games, and even to the actual rules. For this reason, traditional views are in opposition to the involvement of corporations in sports. Clearly, the objectors of corporate sponsoring have failed to consider the long-lasting subsistence of certain sports because __________.


(A) when the sponsoring corporation of a sport faces an important decision, it gratefully accepts suggestions put forward by fans

Incorrect.

This is a "Complete the Argument" format question. The missing argument part follows the reason conjunction because, so it's a premise, which supports the conclusion. Therefore, this is a Conclusion Strengthening question:


Premise A: it is common for companies to sponsor sports bodies
+
Premise B: business interests in sports lead to changes in the sport
+
Premise C: traditional sport lovers are opposed to the involvement of businesses in sport because of these changes
=
Conclusion: the traditionalists have neglected the fact that a sport could die out

Strengthening Data: ?


You are required to complete the argument with data that supports the conclusion that traditionalists are not taking a sports long-term existence into account.

Even though, like the conclusion, this answer choice supports the promoters of corporate sponsoring, it doesn't help us validate the conclusion that traditionalists have failed to consider what it takes for certain sports' to continue to exist. Instead, it focuses on the corporations' attitude to fans.


(B) many would probably have ceased to exist without the funding provided by corporations

This answer choice strengthens the conclusion and therefore logically completes the argument. If the people objecting the involvement of corporations in sport had thought about the idea that some sports could have ceased to exist without financial support from such corporations, their views would have been different.


(C) if they had not, they would have realized that sport does not need to be played at a commercial level to be enjoyed

Incorrect.

If anything, this answer choice weakens the conclusion and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. The "individuals" are against the commercialism of sport. Because this statement supports their view, it undermines the conclusion.


(D) they are less concerned with a sport's character and more concerned with whether a sport will be played in 100 years time

Incorrect.

This answer choice cannot logically complete the argument because it contradicts the conclusion: the conclusion (first part of sentence) claims the objectors are said to have neglected sports' long-lasting subsistence, but this answer choice (the missing part) claims the objectors are concerned about whether a sport will be played in 100 years time.


(E) commercializing a game can remove its authentic appeal to spectators

Incorrect.

This answer choice weakens the conclusion and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. If making a certain sport more commercial hurts its appeal, it will probably lead to the failure of a sport. However, this idea opposes that presented by the conclusion - that the sponsors, rather than their objectors, care about the survival of certain sports.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts