Hi kovid231,This is a sharp observation, and you're right about one thing:
if the goal were the true average hike time across
all hikers everywhere, then yes, you'd have to weight each trail's average by how many hikers walked it. Pooling raw hiker data and then taking a flat average of the seven trail numbers would give different results.
But that's not what the statement is doing. Look at the wording: it talks about
"trails with above-average hike times." The thing being averaged here isn't hikers - it's
trails. Each trail contributes exactly one number (its own listed average hike time), and the benchmark is simply the
mean of those seven trail-level values. Each trail is weighted equally because the statement is sorting
trails, not blending
hikers.
So there are two different quantities, and only one of them is in play:
-
Average across all hikers (a population figure) - this
would need hiker counts to weight it. Your instinct is correct here.
-
Average of the seven trail averages (a cutoff to classify trails as "above" or "below") - this treats each trail as one data point, so hiker counts are irrelevant.
The statement only needs the second one. You compute (
92 +
105 +
88 +
117 +
84 +
78 +
95) /
7 ≈
94.1, then pick out the trails reading above
94.1: Granite Path (sat.
91, rank
2), Summit Ridge (sat.
95, rank
1), and Canyon Bend (sat.
81, rank
5). No hiker weighting required - you're just ranking the seven listed numbers.
Now finish the statement - it lands on NoWithin that above-average group, the
lowest satisfaction is Canyon Bend (
81), at usage rank
5. The statement claims that trail is
also the least used overall. But the least used trail overall is
Sandy Dunes at rank 7 - and Sandy Dunes isn't even in the above-average group. So the lowest-satisfaction trail here is
not the least used overall.
That's why the answer is
No - exactly what Bunuel's solution above concludes. Your worry about averaging didn't actually change the answer; the simple mean of the seven trail values is the right cutoff, and once you apply it, the rank-7 mismatch settles it.
Answer: Nokovid231
For the 3rd question. how are we taking averages of averages? isn't that something we shouldn't do considering this has been devised basis no. of minutes taken by hikers and we have different quantities of hikers. overall average could be very different from this average. please help explain this point to me.