NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 04:08 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 04:08
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta

Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
Sajjad1994
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33028 [7]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta [#permalink] New post   05 Dec 2023, 11:42
7
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (03:49) correct 75% (03:28) wrong based on 95 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Data Insights (DI) Butler 2023-24 [Question #143, Date: Dec-05-2023] [Click here for Details]


The table shows a wine critic’s ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vintages of wines from several wine regions. The critic considers Outstanding the vintages that received a grade of 96 or higher; Excellent, the vintages that received a grade between 91 and 95, inclusive; Very Good, the vintages that received a grade between 86 and 90, inclusive; Good, the vintages that received a grade between 81 and 85, inclusive; Average, the vintages that received a grade between 71 and 80, inclusive; and Below Average, the vintages that received a grade of 70 or lower. “N/A” refers to vintages that have not been rated.


RegionCountry20102009200820072006
Bordeaux — Haut ModocFranceN/A92928386
Bordeaux — MargauxFrance9497918485
Bordeaux — PomerolFrance9394928487
Bordeaux — SauternesFrance9195889185
Bordeaux — St. EmilionFrance9291938489
Burgundy — BeaujolaisFrance8994818587
Burgundy — Cote de BeauneFrance9192888081
Burgundy — Cote de NuitsFrance9093848590
California, Central Coast (Pinot Noir)U.S.A.8587909393
California, North Coast (Merlot)U.S.A.N/A86818482
California, North Coast (Cabernet Sauvignon)U.S.A.9192959589
California, North Coast (Pinot Noir)U.S.A.9091879385
California, North Coast (Zinfandel)U.S.A.8482778681
Languedoc — RoussillonFrance9690889091
Piemonte — BarbarescoItalyN/AN/A918992
Piemonte — BarberaItalyN/A87888387
Piemonte — BaroloItalyN/AN/A949698
Rhone — Chateauneuf du PapeFrance9694879588
Rhone — Cote RotieFrance9397828790
Rhone — GigondasFrance9294818689
Tuscany — Brunello di MontalcinoItalyN/AN/A919497
Tuscany — ChiantiItalyN/A92899394
Tuscany — Vino Nobile di MontepulcianoItalyN/A91929193
(Sort ↕ the table by clicking on the headers)

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true based on the information in the table. Otherwise, select No.
Yes No
Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2006 vintage was less likely to receive an Average rating than was a 2007 vintage.
Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2010 vintage was more likely to receive an Outstanding rating than was the vintage of any other year.
Among the 2006 vintages from California’s North Coast that were rated, none received a grade higher than 89.
Submit
Click Submit to add this question to your Error log
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2006 vintage was less likely to receive an Average rating than was a 2007 vintage.: Yes Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2010 vintage was more likely to receive an Outstanding rating than was the vintage of any other year.: Yes Among the 2006 vintages from California’s North Coast that were rated, none received a grade higher than 89.: Yes
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
Sajjad1994
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33028 [3]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
Re: The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta [#permalink] New post   08 Dec 2023, 11:25
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

Statement 1

A vintage is considered Average if it receives a grade between 71 and 80, inclusive. Sort the table by the 2006 column and then by the 2007 column. No 2006 vintage received such a grade; however, the 2007 Côte de Beaune did. Since the same number of wines were rated in 2006 and 2007, the statement is correct.

Answer: Yes

Statement 2

This statement is also correct. The 2010 vintages from 15 regions were rated, and two received an Outstanding rating (96 or higher). Two 2009 vintages and two 2006 vintages also received an Outstanding rating, but that was from a larger number of regions rated (20 of them in 2009 and 23 in 2006). Thus, the probability of an Outstanding rating was greater for a 2010 vintage than for any other vintage.

Answer: Yes

Statement 3

This statement is correct as well. Four different wines from California’s north coast were rated in 2006, and all of them received a grade of 89 or lower. Note that the one 2006 vintage from the United States that received a higher grade came from California’s central coast, not its north coast.

Answer: Yes
General Discussion
User avatar
B
Sandipyadav2023
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta [#permalink] New post   05 Dec 2023, 18:41
I didn’t get question no.2 can anyone explain this to me
User avatar
S
Gemmie
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Viet Nam
GPA: 3.55
Send PM
Re: The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta [#permalink] New post   17 Apr 2024, 03:03
1
Kudos
­outstanding: 96 - 100
excellent
very good
good
avg: 71 - 80
below avg

Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2006 vintage was less likely to receive an Average rating than was a 2007 vintage. => Yes

Sort by 2006: No vintage received avg
Sort by 2007: 1 vintage received avg (rating 80)

Of all the regions and vintages that were rated, a 2010 vintage was more likely to receive an Outstanding rating than was the vintage of any other year. => Yes

Sort by 2010: 2 vintage received 2 Outstanding (2 ratings 96)
Sort by 2009: 2 vintage received 2 Outstanding (2 ratings 97)
Sort by 2008: 0 vintage received Outstanding 
Sort by 2007: 1 vintage received 2 Outstanding (rating 96)
Sort by 2006: 2 vintage received 2 Outstanding (2 ratings 97 and 98)

However, among 2010, 2009 and 2006, the number of regions rated in 2010 is the lowest
=> the probability in 2010 is the highest

Among the 2006 vintages from California’s North Coast that were rated, none received a grade higher than 89. => Yes

Sort by Region: No vintage in CA, North Coast received a rating higher than 89
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: The table shows a wine critics ratings of the 2006 through 2010 vinta [#permalink]
17 Apr 2024, 03:03
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
92990 posts
BottomJee
DI Forum Moderator
1030 posts
chetan2u
RC & DI Moderator
11184 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions