Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0808:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Mon/Wed June 8, 2026 →August 12, 2026 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..- Jun 10
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Scoring 715 on the GMAT Focus Edition requires more than just learning formulas, memorizing concepts, or solving hundreds of questions. In this episode, Nishant shares how he improved his GMAT preparation by focusing on application of concepts, and more. 
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
26 Feb 2026, 17:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
Montana had the highest hire rate in October 2023, while New York and the District of Columbia shared the lowest hire rates.: Yes
In October 2023, only one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7 percent than the number of states that did in September 2023.: Yes
Statistically significant over-the-month increase in hire rate happened only in 2 states.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
77% (02:19) correct
23%
(02:31)
wrong
based on 308
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
| State | Hire rate, September 2023 | Hire rate, October 2023 | 1-month percentage change | Statistically significant? | Number of hires, October 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 4.3 | 3.6 | -0.7 | Yes | 77000 |
| Alaska | 5.5 | 5.2 | -0.3 | No | 17000 |
| California | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 | No | 553000 |
| Colorado | 4 | 4.6 | 0.6 | No | 133000 |
| Connecticut | 3.5 | 3.7 | 0.2 | No | 63000 |
| District of Columbia | 3.1 | 2.8 | -0.3 | No | 22000 |
| Florida | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 | No | 391000 |
| Georgia | 4.3 | 4.7 | 0.4 | No | 230000 |
| Hawaii | 3.3 | 3.3 | 0 | No | 21000 |
| Illinois | 3.2 | 3.7 | 0.5 | No | 225000 |
| Indiana | 3.7 | 4.1 | 0.4 | No | 136000 |
| Iowa | 3.3 | 3.8 | 0.5 | No | 61000 |
| Kansas | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0 | No | 50000 |
| Kentucky | 5.1 | 3.7 | -1.4 | Yes | 76000 |
| Louisiana | 5.5 | 4.2 | -1.3 | Yes | 83000 |
| Maryland | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0 | No | 108000 |
| Massachusetts | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 | No | 114000 |
| Michigan | 3.2 | 3.3 | 0.1 | No | 148000 |
| Minnesota | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.2 | No | 118000 |
| Missouri | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0 | No | 112000 |
| Montana | 4.8 | 5.4 | 0.6 | No | 28000 |
| Nebraska | 3.6 | 3.5 | -0.1 | No | 37000 |
| Nevada | 4 | 4.1 | 0.1 | No | 64000 |
| New Jersey | 3.8 | 3.5 | -0.3 | No | 153000 |
| New Mexico | 3.9 | 4 | 0.1 | No | 35000 |
| New York | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | No | 276000 |
| North Carolina | 3.9 | 3.3 | -0.6 | No | 165000 |
| North Dakota | 4.1 | 4.1 | 0 | No | 18000 |
| Oregon | 3.8 | 3.9 | 0.1 | No | 79000 |
| Pennsylvania | 3.6 | 3.2 | -0.4 | No | 198000 |
| Rhode Island | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0 | No | 21000 |
| South Carolina | 4.5 | 4.6 | 0.1 | No | 107000 |
| Tennessee | 4.8 | 4.3 | -0.5 | No | 141000 |
| Texas | 3.9 | 4.5 | 0.6 | Yes | 636000 |
The table shows information on hire rates in two consecutive months of September and October in the year 2023, along with the number of hires in October 2023.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true based solely on the information in the table; otherwise select No.
(Source: TCYOnline)
| Yes | No | Statements |
| Montana had the highest hire rate in October 2023, while New York and the District of Columbia shared the lowest hire rates. | ||
| In October 2023, only one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7 percent than the number of states that did in September 2023. | ||
| Statistically significant over-the-month increase in hire rate happened only in 2 states. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Montana had the highest hire rate in October 2023, while New York and the District of Columbia shared the lowest hire rates.: Yes
In October 2023, only one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7 percent than the number of states that did in September 2023.: Yes
Statistically significant over-the-month increase in hire rate happened only in 2 states.: No
26 Feb 2026, 17:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Right Answer Explanation / Suggested Answer:
1) Correct. This can be seen by simple sorting of Hire rate in Oct-2023.
(2) Correct. In Sept-2023, 3 states had hire rate = 3.7 . In Oct-2023, 4 states had hire rate = 3.7. In October 2023, one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7 percent than the number of states that did in September 2023.
(3) The over-the-month increase occurred in Texas, Colorado and Montana (+0.6 point), but it was statistically significant only in 1 state (Texas).
1) Correct. This can be seen by simple sorting of Hire rate in Oct-2023.
(2) Correct. In Sept-2023, 3 states had hire rate = 3.7 . In Oct-2023, 4 states had hire rate = 3.7. In October 2023, one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7 percent than the number of states that did in September 2023.
(3) The over-the-month increase occurred in Texas, Colorado and Montana (+0.6 point), but it was statistically significant only in 1 state (Texas).
Amity007
27 Feb 2026, 05:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
This is a classic Graphs and Tables Yes/No question — the key skill is reading the table precisely and resisting the urge to scan every row. Work each statement individually.
Step 1 — Statement 1: "Montana had the highest hire rate in October 2023, while New York and DC shared the lowest."
For the maximum, scan the Oct-2023 hire rate column for the highest value. Montana = 5.4. Check the other high candidates: Alaska = 5.2, Louisiana = 4.2, Tennessee = 4.3. Montana is indeed highest.
For the minimum: New York = 2.8, DC = 2.8. Any lower? Massachusetts = 3.0, California = 3.0. No state goes below 2.8. NY and DC are tied lowest.
Statement 1 → Yes
Step 2 — Statement 2: "In October 2023, one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7% than in September 2023."
In September 2023, count states with hire rate = 3.7: check the table carefully → 3 states (Connecticut 3.5→ no, Missouri 3.7 yes, Minnesota 3.7 yes, Indiana 3.7 yes).
In October 2023, count states with hire rate = 3.7: Connecticut 3.7 yes, Illinois 3.7 yes, Missouri 3.7 yes, Minnesota 3.9 no → 4 states at 3.7 in October.
Difference = 4 − 3 = 1. Exactly one more state matched 3.7% in October.
Statement 2 → Yes
Step 3 — Statement 3: "Statistically significant over-the-month increase in hire rate happened in only 2 states."
This is where most people slip up. The "Statistically significant?" column marks only 3 states as Yes: Alabama (−0.7, a decrease), Louisiana (−1.3, a decrease), and Texas (+0.6, an increase).
The statement asks specifically about statistically significant increases. Only Texas qualifies. That's 1 state, not 2.
Statement 3 → No
Common trap: Students count Alabama and Texas as two "Yes" entries with large absolute changes and mark this as Yes. The trap is ignoring the direction of change — Alabama and Louisiana had significant decreases, not increases. Always cross-reference the significance flag with the sign of the percentage change.
Takeaway: On G&T Yes/No questions with a flag column, always check two columns together — the flag AND the direction of change — never just count the flags.
— Kavya | 725 (GMAT Focus) | Founder @ edskore.com
Step 1 — Statement 1: "Montana had the highest hire rate in October 2023, while New York and DC shared the lowest."
For the maximum, scan the Oct-2023 hire rate column for the highest value. Montana = 5.4. Check the other high candidates: Alaska = 5.2, Louisiana = 4.2, Tennessee = 4.3. Montana is indeed highest.
For the minimum: New York = 2.8, DC = 2.8. Any lower? Massachusetts = 3.0, California = 3.0. No state goes below 2.8. NY and DC are tied lowest.
Statement 1 → Yes
Step 2 — Statement 2: "In October 2023, one more state matched the national hiring rate of 3.7% than in September 2023."
In September 2023, count states with hire rate = 3.7: check the table carefully → 3 states (Connecticut 3.5→ no, Missouri 3.7 yes, Minnesota 3.7 yes, Indiana 3.7 yes).
In October 2023, count states with hire rate = 3.7: Connecticut 3.7 yes, Illinois 3.7 yes, Missouri 3.7 yes, Minnesota 3.9 no → 4 states at 3.7 in October.
Difference = 4 − 3 = 1. Exactly one more state matched 3.7% in October.
Statement 2 → Yes
Step 3 — Statement 3: "Statistically significant over-the-month increase in hire rate happened in only 2 states."
This is where most people slip up. The "Statistically significant?" column marks only 3 states as Yes: Alabama (−0.7, a decrease), Louisiana (−1.3, a decrease), and Texas (+0.6, an increase).
The statement asks specifically about statistically significant increases. Only Texas qualifies. That's 1 state, not 2.
Statement 3 → No
Common trap: Students count Alabama and Texas as two "Yes" entries with large absolute changes and mark this as Yes. The trap is ignoring the direction of change — Alabama and Louisiana had significant decreases, not increases. Always cross-reference the significance flag with the sign of the percentage change.
Takeaway: On G&T Yes/No questions with a flag column, always check two columns together — the flag AND the direction of change — never just count the flags.
— Kavya | 725 (GMAT Focus) | Founder @ edskore.com
