|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
07 May 2025, 05:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.: Describes Group Discussion
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.: Describes Group Discussion
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.: Describes Group Discussion
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
50% (02:41) correct
50%
(02:44)
wrong
based on 211
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The table summarizes the results of a university's recent study on different methods used to teach first-year college students across four academic subjects. Each student was taught using exactly one of four instructional methods. For each subject, the effectiveness of a given method is measured by the average final exam score of students taught using that method. A method is considered optimal for a subject if it yields the highest average final exam score among the four methods for that subject.
Average Final Exam Score by Teaching Method:
Each of the following options is a description of exactly one of the four instructional methods.
For each option, select Describes Group Discussion if the given information indicates that the description is true of the Group Discussion method. Otherwise, select Does not describe Group Discussion.
Average Final Exam Score by Teaching Method:
| Subject | Lecture | Group Discussion | Online Module | Case Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| History | 76 | 82 | 74 | 79 |
| Biology | 85 | 81 | 78 | 88 |
| Economics | 77 | 79 | 73 | 74 |
| Psychology | 80 | 83 | 79 | 81 |
| Sociology | 75 | 77 | 80 | 76 |
| Philosophy | 82 | 78 | 76 | 85 |
Each of the following options is a description of exactly one of the four instructional methods.
For each option, select Describes Group Discussion if the given information indicates that the description is true of the Group Discussion method. Otherwise, select Does not describe Group Discussion.
| Describes Group Discussion | Does Not Describe Group Discussion | |
| Was the optimal method for at least three subjects. | ||
| Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy. | ||
| Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.: Describes Group Discussion
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.: Describes Group Discussion
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.: Describes Group Discussion
15 May 2025, 02:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Statement 1:
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.
- Group Discussion scores highest in History (82), Economics (79) and Psychology (83).
Statement 2:
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.
- Philosophy scores:
- Lecture: 82
- Group Discussion: 78
- Online Module: 76
- Case Study: 85
- Group Discussion is the second-lowest after Online Module.
Statement 3:
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.
- Identify subjects where Case Study was second-highest:
- History: Case Study (79) is second to Group Discussion (82) → Group Discussion highest.
- Biology: Case Study (88) is highest, not second.
- Economics: Case Study (74) is third.
- Psychology: Case Study (81) is second to Group Discussion (83) → Group Discussion highest.
- Sociology: Case Study (76) is third.
- Philosophy: Case Study (85) is highest, not second.
- In both History and Psychology, Group Discussion produced the highest score when Case Study was second.
Moderators:
