Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
31 Jul 2023, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
34% (03:11) correct
66%
(03:26) wrong
based on 184
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
62% (01:14) correct 38%
(01:36) wrong
based on 203
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Terracotta Army, 8,000 terracotta warrior figures guarding the tomb of the first Chinese emperor, Qin Shui Huang (259–210 BCE), was discovered in Xi’an in northwest China in 1974. The finding was remarkable not only for the sheer number of figures but for the intricate details of each sculpture. While it was a well-developed art form in ancient Greece, sculpture seems to have played only a minor role in ancient Asian art until the ascension of Qin Shui Huang. The variety of ear shapes, hairstyles, and armor among the figures has archaeologists pondering the possibility that the Terracotta Army may be representations of actual individual warriors. Such a level of detail is far beyond that of any known earlier Chinese sculptures.
Experts are searching for an explanation for this seemingly sudden appearance of sophisticated sculpture in ancient China. Recent DNA analysis of human remains found in westernmost China from the period of Qin Shui Huang yielded the surprising presence of European DNA, leading anthropologists to believe that Western contact with China may significantly predate the Silk Road, usually considered the inception of the relationship between these two civilizations. What is even more remarkable, however, is one of the responses to this discovery. Professor Lukas Nickel, an art historian from the University of Vienna, speculates that the presence of the DNA indicates that a Greek sculptor may have been employed at the site of the Terracotta Army to train the locals. Nickel also cites ancient Chinese records that reveal tales of giant statues appearing in the far West, as well as narratives stating that the emperor ordered the casting of copies in bronze that were erected in front of his palace. This account supports the notion of early contact between China and the West, which Nickel says could have inspired the First Emperor not only to duplicate the giant statues but also to build the huge Terracotta Army along with other life-size sculptures. Li Xiuzhen, a Chinese archaeologist specializing in the Terracotta Army, responds that the sculptures “may be inspired by Western culture, but were uniquely made by the Chinese.”
Nickel’s leap from the presence of European DNA in one part of China to his conclusion strains credulity. It is, at best, an interesting hypothesis demanding further evidence and, at worst, a pernicious example of Western cultural elitism wherein artistic developments that parallel or exceed those of Western culture are considered impossible without the impetus of Western influence.
Experts are searching for an explanation for this seemingly sudden appearance of sophisticated sculpture in ancient China. Recent DNA analysis of human remains found in westernmost China from the period of Qin Shui Huang yielded the surprising presence of European DNA, leading anthropologists to believe that Western contact with China may significantly predate the Silk Road, usually considered the inception of the relationship between these two civilizations. What is even more remarkable, however, is one of the responses to this discovery. Professor Lukas Nickel, an art historian from the University of Vienna, speculates that the presence of the DNA indicates that a Greek sculptor may have been employed at the site of the Terracotta Army to train the locals. Nickel also cites ancient Chinese records that reveal tales of giant statues appearing in the far West, as well as narratives stating that the emperor ordered the casting of copies in bronze that were erected in front of his palace. This account supports the notion of early contact between China and the West, which Nickel says could have inspired the First Emperor not only to duplicate the giant statues but also to build the huge Terracotta Army along with other life-size sculptures. Li Xiuzhen, a Chinese archaeologist specializing in the Terracotta Army, responds that the sculptures “may be inspired by Western culture, but were uniquely made by the Chinese.”
Nickel’s leap from the presence of European DNA in one part of China to his conclusion strains credulity. It is, at best, an interesting hypothesis demanding further evidence and, at worst, a pernicious example of Western cultural elitism wherein artistic developments that parallel or exceed those of Western culture are considered impossible without the impetus of Western influence.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. compare the development of sculpture as an art form in the ancient Greek and Chinese cultures
B. challenge an interpretation of new physical evidence of the presence of Western DNA in China
C. criticize the authenticity of recent evidence used to address the question of how the Greek and Chinese sculptural arts came to share many characteristics
D. discuss the contribution of Greek artisans to the design and construction of the Terracotta Army
E. present evidence that suggests an explanation for the sudden appearance of advanced sculpture techniques in China
A. compare the development of sculpture as an art form in the ancient Greek and Chinese cultures
B. challenge an interpretation of new physical evidence of the presence of Western DNA in China
C. criticize the authenticity of recent evidence used to address the question of how the Greek and Chinese sculptural arts came to share many characteristics
D. discuss the contribution of Greek artisans to the design and construction of the Terracotta Army
E. present evidence that suggests an explanation for the sudden appearance of advanced sculpture techniques in China
2. The passage implies which of the following about the sculptures of the Terracotta Army?
A. They did not include anatomical features specific to individual subjects.
B. Their detailed features enable art historians and archaeologists to definitively identify individual warriors.
C. They were a further development of the earlier traditions of Chinese sculpture.
D. They were due to the training provided by Greek sculptors.
E. They may have some similarities in style to some contemporary Greek sculptures.
A. They did not include anatomical features specific to individual subjects.
B. Their detailed features enable art historians and archaeologists to definitively identify individual warriors.
C. They were a further development of the earlier traditions of Chinese sculpture.
D. They were due to the training provided by Greek sculptors.
E. They may have some similarities in style to some contemporary Greek sculptures.
RC Butler 2023 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 258 Date: 31 Jul-2023
This question is part of RC Butler 2023. Click here for Details
Passage # 258 Date: 31 Jul-2023
This question is part of RC Butler 2023. Click here for Details
Kaplan GRE Verbal Workbook 2018
09 Jun 2024, 00:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #1
The strong language in the last paragraph, “strains credulity” and “pernicious example,” are clear indicators of the author’s disagreement with Nickel’s assessment. A good prediction of the author’s purpose would be to rebut Nickel’s interpretation of the presence of Western DNA in ancient China. (B) matches the prediction and is correct. (C) distorts two aspects of the passage. First, the author is criticizing the interpretation of the DNA evidence, not its authenticity. Second, while the text indicates that Greek sculpture in the 3rd century BC was more advanced than Chinese sculpture at the time, nowhere does it compare "many characteristics" of the two traditions. The remaining choices can be eliminated by a verb scan. The passage does not (A) compare cultural developments of sculpture, and the neutral verbs (D) discuss and (E) present do not accurately reflect the author’s definite opinion.
The strong language in the last paragraph, “strains credulity” and “pernicious example,” are clear indicators of the author’s disagreement with Nickel’s assessment. A good prediction of the author’s purpose would be to rebut Nickel’s interpretation of the presence of Western DNA in ancient China. (B) matches the prediction and is correct. (C) distorts two aspects of the passage. First, the author is criticizing the interpretation of the DNA evidence, not its authenticity. Second, while the text indicates that Greek sculpture in the 3rd century BC was more advanced than Chinese sculpture at the time, nowhere does it compare "many characteristics" of the two traditions. The remaining choices can be eliminated by a verb scan. The passage does not (A) compare cultural developments of sculpture, and the neutral verbs (D) discuss and (E) present do not accurately reflect the author’s definite opinion.
09 Jun 2024, 00:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION #2
The key word "implies" identifies this as an Inference question. The "sculptures of the Terracotta Army" are discussed throughout the text, so expect to compare each choice to the passage. (A) and (B) are distortions of the fourth sentence of the first paragraph. Since archaeologists are "pondering the possibility that the Terracotta Army may be representations of actual individual warriors," it is not yet known if these details do (B) or do not (A) represent individuals. (C) is a 180, or opposite, choice. The final sentence of the first paragraph identifies the details of these sculptures as "far beyond" those of earlier sculptures, and the first sentence of the second paragraph described their appearance as "sudden," not based on earlier traditions. (D) is an extreme restatement of Nickel's opinion, with which the author disagrees. That leaves (E), which is not stated directly in the passage, but is supported by the point at issue. If the sculptures were in no way similar to Western sculpture, it is not likely that experts would be debating Western influence. Also, in the last sentence of the second paragraph, the Chinese expert acknowledges the possible inspiration from Western sources.
The key word "implies" identifies this as an Inference question. The "sculptures of the Terracotta Army" are discussed throughout the text, so expect to compare each choice to the passage. (A) and (B) are distortions of the fourth sentence of the first paragraph. Since archaeologists are "pondering the possibility that the Terracotta Army may be representations of actual individual warriors," it is not yet known if these details do (B) or do not (A) represent individuals. (C) is a 180, or opposite, choice. The final sentence of the first paragraph identifies the details of these sculptures as "far beyond" those of earlier sculptures, and the first sentence of the second paragraph described their appearance as "sudden," not based on earlier traditions. (D) is an extreme restatement of Nickel's opinion, with which the author disagrees. That leaves (E), which is not stated directly in the passage, but is supported by the point at issue. If the sculptures were in no way similar to Western sculpture, it is not likely that experts would be debating Western influence. Also, in the last sentence of the second paragraph, the Chinese expert acknowledges the possible inspiration from Western sources.
