Bunuel
The threatened prosecution of businesses flying 20-by-38-foot garrison flags, which are traditionally to be flown on national holidays, instead of the smaller post flags, which can be flown at any time, is unconscionable. Legal technicalities of this sort should never restrict patriotic expression.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?
(A) Many people find the garrison flags’ size to be distracting and ill suited to neighborhood aesthetics.
(B) The businesses that are flying garrison flags do so primarily to attract customers.
(C) The raising and lowering of different-sized flags on the correct days of the year is a laborious and time-consuming procedure.
(D) The regulations that govern the correct display of the nation’s flags are part of an old and time-honored tradition.
(E) The symbolic significance of a flag’s size is not generally understood by most of the customers patronizing these businesses.
Official Explanation:
Step 1: Identify the Question TypeThe word “weaken” in the question stem signals that this is a Weaken question. We need the answer choice that makes the argument’s conclusion less likely to be true.
Step 2: Untangle the StimulusWe start by finding the conclusion, evidence, and assumption. The conclusion is the first sentence, which states that businesses should not be prosecuted for flying large garrison flags rather than smaller post flags. The evidence is the second sentence: legal technicalities should not restrict patriotic expression. The author of this argument assumes that businesses are flying the garrison flags out of a sense of patriotism, rather than for some other reason.
Step 3: Predict the AnswerBecause this is a Weaken question, the correct answer will make the central assumption less likely to be true. We’ll look for a choice stating that businesses fly the larger flags for some reason other than patriotism.
Step 4: Evaluate the Choices(B) matches our prediction: if businesses are flying large garrison flags to attract customers, they are not doing so out of a sense of patriotism. Because the argument’s evidence hinges on “patriotic expression,” the conclusion that these businesses should not be prosecuted is thus greatly weakened. This is the correct answer. (A) is incorrect because it falls outside the scope of the argument, which is concerned not with “neighborhood aesthetics” but with the permissibility of flying the larger flags. (C) is incorrect because it is a slight strengthener, not a weakener. The fact that abiding by the proper flag calendar and switching back and forth between the larger and smaller flags is “laborious and time-consuming” could be cited as an additional reason businesses should not be prosecuted for sticking to the larger flags. (D) is out of scope. It, like (A), provides a reason that businesses should perhaps not be allowed to fly whichever flag they like with impunity, but this reason—long-standing tradition—has nothing to do with the scope of the argument, which focuses on patriotic expression. (E) is out of scope. Whether or not business patrons understand the “symbolic significance” of a flag’s size has no effect on the conclusion that business owners ought not to be prosecuted for flying the larger flags.
Choice (B) is correct.