Last visit was: 11 May 2026, 20:48 It is currently 11 May 2026, 20:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
seofah
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 03 Apr 2010
Posts: 486
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 486
Kudos: 3,161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
beckee529
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Last visit: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
Posts: 393
Kudos: 1,981
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
excelgmat
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Last visit: 03 Jun 2008
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
Posts: 98
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
suithink
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Last visit: 23 Dec 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Posts: 31
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Which one of the following most accurately describes a
flaw in the reasoning above?
IMO B

question stem:
Only Grav Forces -------> (Causes) -->Tides
This a Cause --> effect ....
Flaw in Reasoning implies ----> Alternate cause can be there
(In Cause effect -Flaw can also be due to other reasons..)

(A) It gives only one example of a tidal range.---NA
(B) It fails to consider that the size of a tidal range could be affected by the conditions in which gravitational forces act.----Conditions like depth of sea bed maybe--> Alternate cause exists..
(C) It does not consider the possibility that low tides are measured in a different way than are hightides.--NA
(D) It presumes, without providing warrant, that most activity within the world’s oceans is a result of an interplay of gravitational forces.---'Most activity' ---Out of Scope!
(E) It does not differentiate between the tidal effect of the sun and the tidal effect of the moon.[/quote]---still original C -->E statement is valid...
User avatar
seofah
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 03 Apr 2010
Posts: 486
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 486
Kudos: 3,161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When doing this question, I got confused by the word "flaw".
From suithink's analysis, it is just a "weaken the argument" question.
IMO, "weaken" and "flaw" questions are not entirely the same, although there are overlaps.
any views on this?
User avatar
suithink
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Last visit: 23 Dec 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Posts: 31
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
botirvoy
When doing this question, I got confused by the word "flaw".
From suithink's analysis, it is just a "weaken the argument" question.
IMO, "weaken" and "flaw" questions are not entirely the same, although there are overlaps.
any views on this?


In fact this is a 'Flaw in the reasoning Q '...Not weaken ...

In FiR Qs ...the question stem will state that the argument is flawed.


Weaken the argument Qs need 'extra info' NOT given in argument to 'hurt' the conclusion..

Hence in Weaken Type ..we need to go thr each answer choice to see if the conclusion is 'hurt'----->
That's why in weaken qs the question stem is " Which of the following statements if true,"....weakens.
.

In short in FiR....Premise 1+ Premise 2----> conclusion ...Something is already wrong....
In Weaken ...New Info weakens it...(We may not notice any cracks..)
The flow of info is from Answer Choices to argument....

In FiR ...the basic structure in which the argument is created is questionable...

I hope my explanation ... made sense to you...
:-D
User avatar
vineetgupta
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Last visit: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
Posts: 377
Kudos: 1,423
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suithink
botirvoy
When doing this question, I got confused by the word "flaw".
From suithink's analysis, it is just a "weaken the argument" question.
IMO, "weaken" and "flaw" questions are not entirely the same, although there are overlaps.
any views on this?

In fact this is a 'Flaw in the reasoning Q '...Not weaken ...

In FiR Qs ...the question stem will state that the argument is flawed.


Weaken the argument Qs need 'extra info' NOT given in argument to 'hurt' the conclusion..

Hence in Weaken Type ..we need to go thr each answer choice to see if the conclusion is 'hurt'----->
That's why in weaken qs the question stem is " Which of the following statements if true,"....weakens.
.

In short in FiR....Premise 1+ Premise 2----> conclusion ...Something is already wrong....
In Weaken ...New Info weakens it...(We may not notice any cracks..)
The flow of info is from Answer Choices to argument....

In FiR ...the basic structure in which the argument is created is questionable...

I hope my explanation ... made sense to you...
:-D


Good Explanation!!!...C is the answer.
User avatar
vay
Joined: 17 May 2007
Last visit: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Posts: 54
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
my pick is C
User avatar
seofah
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Last visit: 03 Apr 2010
Posts: 486
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 486
Kudos: 3,161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suithink, thx for putting effort to explain! definately makes sense...

OA B!

any other views on the question itself?



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
561 posts
363 posts