It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 01:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated.

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 298

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 7

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2009, 23:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.
Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?
(A) The argument depends on the assumption the whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.
_________________

"CEO in making"

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 7

Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 504

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2009, 00:17
A

All other answers are not relevant.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2009, 02:14
IMO D

The flaw is that: the study is conducted on such employees whom the study will show to be lie because they are surely known not doing that, not because the lie detector can show that they lie

Other choices do not state the fundamental flaw

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.
Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?
(A) The argument depends on the assumption the whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them --> the best
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2009
Posts: 204

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2009, 04:43
I do with option 'D'

D)The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.

According to the passage:
In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.
Here it is clearly stated that the project never existed, so when 1/3 of the applicants lied about having worked on that project, it can be judged even without a detector. It does not indicate anywhere in the passage that the detector detected it.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 9

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 810

Kudos [?]: 373 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2009, 03:48
D for me.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 373 [0], given: 106

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 280

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2009, 09:36

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Re: Lie Detectors   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2009, 09:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by