December 13, 2018 December 13, 2018 08:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. December 14, 2018 December 14, 2018 09:00 AM PST 10:00 AM PST 10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3232
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2005, 06:32
Question Stats:
43% (03:36) correct 57% (03:45) wrong based on 337 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500 employees after a fouryear period during which it increased every year. During this fouryear period, the ratio of the number of workers from one year to the next was always an integer. The ratio of the number of workers after the fourth year to the number of workers after the the second year is 6 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers after the first year is 14 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers before the fouryear period began is 70 to 1. How many employees did the company have after the first year? (A) 50 (B) 70 (C) 250 (D) 350 (E) 750
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 325
Location: Montreal, Canada

10,500/6 = 1,750 = number of workers after the second year
Now we need a number of workers after the third year. Let it = X. We have some clues to get to X:
 10,500/X is an integer greater than 1.
X/1,750 is an integer greater than 1.
We note that 10,500/1750 = 6. So we need two integer factors of 6, and neither factor can be 1. This means that the factors are 2 and 3.
Therefore we have two possibilities: either X is 3,500 or X is 5,250.
But we know that the ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers after the first year is 14 to 1.
3,500/14 = 250
5,250/14 = 375
So the number of workers after the first year is either 250 or 375. But this has to be an integer ratio with the number of workers after the second year, which is 1,750. Of the two possibilities, only 250 satisfies the condition, because 1,750/250 = 7 and 1,750/375 = 4 2/3.
Therefore the number of workers after the first year is 250. Answer C.



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 640
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2017, 06:38
x > x1> x2 > x3 > x4 x4 is 10,500 & x4:x2=6:1 i.e. x2=1750 x3:x1=14:1 x3:x=70:1 since the question states that the ratio between any two years is always an integer, we know that 1,750 must be a multiple of the number of workers after the first year. Since only 70 and 250 are factors of 1750, we know the answer must be either choice B or choice C. If we assume that the number of workers after the first year is 70, however, we can see that this must cannot work. The number of workers always increases from year to year, but if 70 is the number of workers after the first year and if the number of workers after the third year is 14 times greater than that, the number of workers after the third year would be 14 x 70 = 980, which is less than the number of workers after the second year. So choice B is eliminated and the answer must be choice C. I started with choice c. x1=250 50> 250 > 1750 > 3500 > 10,500 Chocie A returns x3=700 which is less than x2=1750, so it has to be ruled out and Choice B can also be ruled out. No other answer choice returns an integer ratio.
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch




Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 445
Location: Chicago

A and B are too low it gives less employess in 3rd year than second year so chuck it
250 gives
50  250  1750  3500  10500
(all ratios in integer)
D, E does not give integer ratios...so C
_________________
Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance



Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20

My answer is also c.
x > x1> x2 > x3 > x4
x4 is 10,500 & x4:x2=6:1 i.e. x2=1750
x3:x1=14:1
x3:x=70:1
I started with choice c. x1=250
50> 250 > 1750 > 3500 > 10,500
Chocie A returns x3=700 which is less than x2=1750, so it has to be ruled out and Choice B can also be ruled out.
No other answer choice returns an integer ratio.



Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3232
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

Good...but hint is you should know your number properties and prime factors./...will post OA later today...



SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1721
Concentration: Finance

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Apr 2014, 08:17
Any alternative approach to solve this backsolving? Thanks much! Cheers! J



Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Posts: 87
WE: Engineering (Consulting)

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2014, 03:37
jlgdr wrote: Any alternative approach to solve this backsolving? Thanks much! Cheers! J make a table according to ratios x 5x 1750 70x 10500 now put options in place of 5x (i.e. multiply each option by 14) you can eliminate A & B just by looking C gives 3500 D gives 490 E gives 10500 (Eliminated) D will not give an integer ratio It will take less than 90 seconds



Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2013
Posts: 134
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2014, 01:34
sanket1991 wrote: jlgdr wrote: Any alternative approach to solve this backsolving? Thanks much! Cheers! J make a table according to ratios x 5x 1750 70x 10500 now put options in place of 5x (i.e. multiply each option by 14) you can eliminate A & B just by looking C gives 3500 D gives 490 E gives 10500 (Eliminated) D will not give an integer ratio It will take less than 90 seconds I didn't get it ? checking each option w.r.t to 5x, will give x=10 for option A. This will satisfy all the ratios. May be I am not getting it? Can any one explain this. Thanks



Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Posts: 87
WE: Engineering (Consulting)

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2014, 17:20
solitaryreaper wrote: sanket1991 wrote: jlgdr wrote: Any alternative approach to solve this backsolving? Thanks much! Cheers! J make a table according to ratios x 5x 1750 70x 10500 now put options in place of 5x (i.e. multiply each option by 14) you can eliminate A & B just by looking C gives 3500 D gives 490 E gives 10500 (Eliminated) D will not give an integer ratio It will take less than 90 seconds I didn't get it ? checking each option w.r.t to 5x, will give x=10 for option A. This will satisfy all the ratios. May be I am not getting it? Can any one explain this. Thanks Well 5x is the number of first year students (as x is number before first year) What I meant was , Options are given for first year, and I have take first year as 5x multiply by 14 will give you number of third year students A and B are so low that they wont reach to 10500 when multiplied by these numbers. I hope you understand...



Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 32

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jan 2016, 09:23
Please see attachment. Thanks
Attachments
SmartSelectImage_20160124122108.png.png [ 181.87 KiB  Viewed 4136 times ]



Intern
Joined: 11 May 2016
Posts: 2

The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2016, 23:15
Is this Question Correct? Question says " the ratio of the number of workers from one year to the next was always an integer." i.e. (After 2nd Year): (After 3rd year):: (integer):1
This statement should be " the ratio of the number of workers from one year to the PREVIOUS was always an integer."
Please clarify.



Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 78
GPA: 4

The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2016, 23:21
FN wrote: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500 employees after a fouryear period during which it increased every year. During this fouryear period, the ratio of the number of workers from one year to the next was always an integer. The ratio of the number of workers after the fourth year to the number of workers after the the second year is 6 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers after the first year is 14 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers before the fouryear period began is 70 to 1. How many employees did the company have after the first year? A very trickilyworded question. I'll use the notation \(Y_n \to Y_k = R\) to signify the ratio increase from year \(n\) to year \(k\), where \(R\) is an integer \(> 1\) (the number of workers increased every year and is an integral ratio). Determine the number of workers on year 2: \(Y_2 = \frac{Y_4}{Y_2 \to Y_4} = \frac{10500}{6} = 1750\) Since \(Y_2 \to Y_4 = 6\) is a 2year gap, there must be two intermediate ratios, the product of which is 6. Therefore each ratio is a combination of the prime factors of 6. We do not currently know this combination. \(Y_2 \to Y_3 \,\bigg\vert\, Y_3 \to Y_4 = \{2,3\}\). Since \(Y_1 \to Y_3 = 14\) is a 2year gap, there must be two intermediate ratios, the product of which is 14. \(Y_1 \to Y_2 \,\bigg\vert\, Y_2 \to Y_3 = \{2,7\}\). From the intersection of the above two statements, we can see that: \(Y_2 \to Y_3 = 2\). From this, we can conclude: \(Y_1 \to Y_2 = 7\\ Y_3 \to Y_4 = 3\) Since we know \(Y_2\) from above, we can obtain \(Y_1\) as follows: \(Y1 = \frac{Y_2}{Y_1 \to Y_2} = \frac{1750}{7} = 250\) \(Y_0 \to Y_3 = 70\\ Y_1 \to Y_3 = 14\\ \therefore Y_0 \to Y_1 = 5\)
\(Y_0 = 50\) \(Y_0 \to Y_1 = 5 \,\vert\, Y_1 = 250\\ Y_1 \to Y_2 = 7 \,\vert\, Y_2 = 1750\\ Y_2 \to Y_3 = 2 \,\vert\, Y_3 = 3500\\ Y_3 \to Y_4 = 3 \,\vert\, Y_4 = 10500\)
_________________
Please press +1 Kudos if this post helps.



Intern
Joined: 13 May 2017
Posts: 8

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2018, 18:28
After all said, you have:
x  5x  1750  70x  10500
You know that: 5x * 2 * 7 = 70x 1750 * 2 * 3 = 10500
So the only possible option is that 1750 * 2 = 70 x, and thus 5 x * 7 = 1750 and 70 x * 3 = 10500 Anyway, you get x = 50 and then 5x = 250.
Hope it is clear.



Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Posts: 519
Location: India

Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Aug 2018, 23:36
FN wrote: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500 employees after a fouryear period during which it increased every year. During this fouryear period, the ratio of the number of workers from one year to the next was always an integer. The ratio of the number of workers after the fourth year to the number of workers after the the second year is 6 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers after the first year is 14 to 1. The ratio of the number of workers after the third year to the number of workers before the fouryear period began is 70 to 1. How many employees did the company have after the first year?
(A) 50 (B) 70 (C) 250 (D) 350 (E) 750 Given \(N_4 = 10500\), \(\frac{N_4}{N_2} = 6\), hence \(N_2 = 1750\) \(\frac{N_3}{N_1} = 14\) & \(\frac{N_3}{N_0} = 70\) We have \(N_0\) > \(N_1\) > \(1750\) > \(14\)\(N_1\) >\(10500\) \(N_1\) is a factor of 1750, hence can be answer choices 50, 70 & 250 We also have \(14\)\(N_1\) \(> 1750\) > \(N_1\)\(> 125\) Hence \(N_1 = 250\) Answer C. Thanks, GyM
_________________
New to GMAT Club  https://gmatclub.com/forum/newtogmatclubneedhelp271131.html#p2098335




Re: The workforce of a certain company comprised exactly 10,500 &nbs
[#permalink]
19 Aug 2018, 23:36






