VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Praveen_Seelam wrote:
Hi All,
I'm really confused with answer choice C,
if the number of kidney transplants that take place each year is not significantly different from the number of kidneys available over that time period; which means the number of kidney transplant that take place each year is almost close to the number of kidneys available over that time period, then where does the lag in kidneys come from ?
argument does not talk anything about kidneys not matching or blood group not matching, so are we supposed to assume that ? how can choice C is an assumption required by argument ?
thanks
You have to be very careful in CR - notice what they are talking about in each sentence. Let's assume variables for clarity.
A - Kidneys available for transplant
B - People waiting on the list for transplant
C - Actual number of transplants that take place.
The argument says this:
A is much less than B.
As evidence, B is 85000 while C is only 16000.
Note that the evidence gives you the numbers of B and C. But we conclude that A is much less than B. How can we do that? The only conclusion from this evidence can be that C is much less than B. How do we conclude that A is much mess than B?
For that we need to assume that A is almost same as C. This is exactly what option (C) tells you. Hence, option (C) is the assumption.
when when negate the assumption the conclusion should fall apart. Is this applicable in every case?
If yes let me try to negate C and see if in any case the conclusion holds:-
assumption:
The number of kidney transplants that take place each year is not significantly different from the number of kidneys available over that time period.
Negate the assumption:
The number of kidney transplants that take place each year is significantly different from the number of kidneys available over that time period.
when we say the number of kidney transplants that take place each year is significantly different from the kidneys available, can we not say transplant done --1000
kidney available- 3 .... the two numbers are significantly different ,, but in this case the the conclusion still remains intact
conclusion :
There are far fewer kidneys available than there are patients.
Please correct me if i am going wrong with my approach.
Thanks:
Gaurav