There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangements to protect the President from assassination. It would be impossible to shield any public official from all contact with the outside world 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Therefore, a determined assassin will always be able to find some opportunity to attack the President.
The above argument would be most weakened if which of the following were true?
(A) Reducing the number of opportunities for an attack on the President will discourage most assassins and improve the President's chances for survival.
(B) By discouraging attacks on the President, the security arrangements surrounding him also protect the lives of bystanders who might be hurt in an assassination attempt.
(C) Most individuals who attempt to take the life of a political leader are mentally unstable and unable to make rational judgments about their actions.
(D) It is part of American tradition that political leaders make themselves available to the general public on a regular basis.
(E) The cost of an assassination attempt would be prohibitively high for most people.
what would the answer for this be ? please do help