GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 26 Aug 2019, 00:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57284
There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2019, 09:31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:30) correct 18% (01:43) wrong based on 61 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangements to protect the President from assassination. It would be impossible to shield any public official from all contact with the outside world 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Therefore, a determined assassin will always be able to find some opportunity to attack the President.

The above argument would be most weakened if which of the following were true?

(A) Reducing the number of opportunities for an attack on the President will discourage most assassins and improve the President's chances for survival.

(B) By discouraging attacks on the President, the security arrangements surrounding him also protect the lives of bystanders who might be hurt in an assassination attempt.

(C) Most individuals who attempt to take the life of a political leader are mentally unstable and unable to make rational judgments about their actions.

(D) It is part of American tradition that political leaders make themselves available to the general public on a regular basis.

(E) The cost of an assassination attempt would be prohibitively high for most people.

_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jul 2019
Posts: 3
CAT Tests
Re: There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2019, 17:32
There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangements to protect the President from assassination. It would be impossible to shield any public official from all contact with the outside world 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Therefore, a determined assassin will always be able to find some opportunity to attack the President.

The above argument would be most weakened if which of the following were true?

(A) Reducing the number of opportunities for an attack on the President will discourage most assassins and improve the President's chances for survival.

(B) By discouraging attacks on the President, the security arrangements surrounding him also protect the lives of bystanders who might be hurt in an assassination attempt.

(C) Most individuals who attempt to take the life of a political leader are mentally unstable and unable to make rational judgments about their actions.

(D) It is part of American tradition that political leaders make themselves available to the general public on a regular basis.

(E) The cost of an assassination attempt would be prohibitively high for most people.

what would the answer for this be ? please do help :)
GMAT Tutor
avatar
G
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1834
Re: There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2019, 19:15
The question is specifically about protecting the President, and whether security arrangements actually help to prevent assassination attempts. The argument claims they don't, though there isn't any particularly good reason provided (the argument essentially says "you can't protect the President all the time, so why bother protecting the President at all?" which is an argument no one would find convincing). Anyway, the answer that explains the problem with the argument is A. If the presence of security most of the time deters people from ever trying to assassinate the President, then having security most of the time is useful.

You can reach the answer by elimination here too - answers C, D and E have nothing to do with the relationship between security and assassination attempts, and answer B talks about how security protects bystanders, which we don't care about - the argument is about whether the President will be protected.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
GMAT Club Bot
Re: There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem   [#permalink] 05 Aug 2019, 19:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There is no point in spending millions of dollars on security arrangem

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne