Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
This problem was already discussed before.. Seems to me that answer A is wrong..
Reasons are : we need to consider three cases.
1. He worked less 34 hours.
2. He worked 34-40 hours
3. He worked more than 40 hours..
When i try to solve, i see only complicated eqauations..And my gut feeling says it's E.. :wall :wall
Any has a quick soln for this ??
In one week a construction worker worked more than 40 hours, and was paid two times his regular hourly rate for every hour worked in excess of 40 hours. If he earned $780, how many hours did he work in that week?
(1) If he had worked 6 more hours that week, his earnings would have been $960.
(2) If he had worked 20 fewer hours that week, his earnings would have been $390 less that week.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I am getting perfectly (A). I don't know why you want to consider those special cases.
let x be worker's hourse salary. Then we can write 40x+N(2x)=780,
where N is number of hourse worked in excess of 40.
Stem1. 40x+6*2x=960,
or 52x=960
or x=240/13 (or approx $19/hrs)
Substituting x in the original equation we can determine N /SUFF/
Stem2. Not sufficient because we don't know what his regular salary is, so we can not determine the exact salary he would get while working 20 hours less. So, MOT SUFF.
I am getting perfectly (A). I don't know why you want to consider those special cases.
let x be worker's hourse salary. Then we can write 40x+N(2x)=780, where N is number of hourse worked in excess of 40.
Stem1. 40x+6*2x=960, or 52x=960 or x=240/13 (or approx $19/hrs)
Substituting x in the original equation we can determine N /SUFF/
Stem2. Not sufficient because we don't know what his regular salary is, so we can not determine the exact salary he would get while working 20 hours less. So, MOT SUFF.
Answer: (A)
Show more
My bad.. I am reading the question wrong.. I somehow got the impression that "if he works more than 40 hours in a week".. But question clearly mentions that he actually worked more than 40 hours that week...
..
In one week a construction worker worked more than 40 hours, and was paid two times his regular hourly rate for every hour worked in excess of 40 hours. If he earned $780, how many hours did he work in that week?
(1) If he had worked 6 more hours that week, his earnings would have been $960. (2) If he had worked 20 fewer hours that week, his earnings would have been $390 less that week.
I am getting perfectly (A). I don't know why you want to consider those special cases.
let x be worker's hourse salary. Then we can write 40x+N(2x)=780, where N is number of hourse worked in excess of 40.
Stem1. 40x+6*2x=960, or 52x=960 or x=240/13 (or approx $19/hrs)
Substituting x in the original equation we can determine N /SUFF/
Stem2. Not sufficient because we don't know what his regular salary is, so we can not determine the exact salary he would get while working 20 hours less. So, MOT SUFF.
Let M be the number of extra hours he worked after 40 hrs.
Let x be the regular pay then 2x is the extra time pay.
The equation we get is
40x + M2x = 780
From 1)
We get
40 + (M+6)2x = 960
40 + M2x +12x = 960
Equating both the equations
We get x =15
2)
he worked 20 hrs less.
Since we do not know how many actual hours he worked we cannot derive a valid equation.
As if he worked only 10 hrs extra. Only the regular salary will be used.
And if he worked 21 hrs extra .... regular + the extra time has to be used.
Hence Insuf
In one week a construction worker worked more than 40 hours, and was paid two times his regular hourly rate for every hour worked in excess of 40 hours. If he earned $780, how many hours did he work in that week?
(1) If he had worked 6 more hours that week, his earnings would have been $960. (2) If he had worked 20 fewer hours that week, his earnings would have been $390 less that week.
I am getting perfectly (A). I don't know why you want to consider those special cases.
let x be worker's hourse salary. Then we can write 40x+N(2x)=780, where N is number of hourse worked in excess of 40.
Stem1. 40x+6*2x=960, or 52x=960 or x=240/13 (or approx $19/hrs)
Substituting x in the original equation we can determine N /SUFF/
Stem2. Not sufficient because we don't know what his regular salary is, so we can not determine the exact salary he would get while working 20 hours less. So, MOT SUFF.
Answer: (A)
Show more
Could be, could be ... I guess it all depends on interpretation of "6 hours more." But the beauty of DS questions is that both of us would have gotten this question right, because there is no need to actually solve the equation...
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.