Shadwal
Hello,
To & Fro Motion questions are generally approached with the assumption that after meeting once, the two bodies will reach the opposite ends, turn around and meet again. My question is, what if the assumption fails?
What if the speed of first body is high enough to reach the end, turn around and meet the second body even before the second body has reached its end?
For example, A and B start from opposite ends. After their first meet, A reaches the end, turns around and passes B before B has reached the end. I have represented the case below.
1st meet:
|------------>-------------------->A
__________________________B<-------|
2nd meet:
|------------->----------------------------->---|
___________________A<--------------<--|
___________________B<---------<-------|
How do we identify such cases?
What is the best approach for To & Fro Motion questions that takes such cases into account?
Thanks,
I understand your concern here, but the only valid answer here is "it depends on what the text of the problem says." If a GMAT problem uses this concept (and that's unlikely, unless it's an extremely difficult problem), then the problem will have to either avoid that situation, or make it completely clear what you're supposed to do in that situation.
Part of the testing process that problems go through, before being used officially, involves being used as experimental questions on real GMATs. When a problem is in this stage, the test writers check to make sure that high scorers are consistently getting that problem right. In a situation like the one you describe - where it's ambiguous what you're supposed to do, and there's no clear way to tell - then some high scorers would get one answer (because they did the right math and decided to ignore the second crossing), and other high scorers would get a different answer (because they did the right math and decided to have the people turn around at the second crossing.) So, the problem would be thrown out or rewritten.
In short: don't worry about this - worry about perfecting your technique and speed on easier rates problems instead.