It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 18:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Today s low gasoline prices make consumers willing to

Author Message
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 588

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Today s low gasoline prices make consumers willing to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2010, 11:20
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

21% (00:56) correct 79% (01:22) wrong based on 33 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Todayâ€™s low gasoline prices make consumers willing to indulge their preference for larger cars, which consume greater amounts of gasoline as fuel. So United States automakers are unwilling to pursue the development of new fuel-efficient technologies aggressively. The particular reluctance of the United States automobile industry to do so, however, could threaten the industryâ€™s future.
Which of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the claim above about the future of the United States automobile industry?
(A) A prototype fuel-efficient vehicle, built five years ago, achieves a very high 81 miles per gallon on the highway and 63 in the city, but its materials are relatively costly.
(B) Small cars sold by manufacturers in the United States are more fuel efficient now than before the sudden jump in oil prices in 1973.
(C) Automakers elsewhere in the world have slowed the introduction of fuel-efficient technologies but have pressed ahead with research and development of them in preparation for a predicted rise in world oil prices.
(D) There are many technological opportunities for reducing the waste of energy in cars and light trucks through weight, aerodynamic drag, and braking friction.
(E) The promotion of mass transit over automobiles as an alternative mode of transportation has encountered consumer resistance that is due in part to the failure of mass transit to accommodate the wide dispersal of points of origin and destinations for trips

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 412

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 588

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2010, 11:21
please give explanation expect from POE

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 412

Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2010, 11:50
IMO C

A does not have any influence on the sonclusion
B weakens the answer as it shows that the auto industry can take up another challenge, if the need be there..
C gives an indication that the oil prices are on the rise
D does not have any influence on the sonclusion.. jus tells that there is lot of scope of improvement
E does not have any influence on the sonclusion

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2010, 08:51
C
The argument is about future. C is only one talking about possible increase in oil prices that could hurt the US automobile industry.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2010, 14:18
Even I 'll go with C..
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 44

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2010, 19:37
All the options are pretty weak and (C) looks best in the lot.

I would pick (C).

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2010, 08:55
IMO C

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2010, 01:28
I pick C

Premise: US auto industry doesn't research new gas-efficient tech
Conclusion: This will hurt the US auto industry in the future

What would strengthen the argument:
Fill in the gap info: Other technology are ahead in the research way, and the gas price will soon go up.

C rules

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2010, 02:50
C it is
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 64

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2010, 03:35
C for me too!
_________________

But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes.
http://aimingformba.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 64

Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: currently in Taiwan
Schools: Top Taiwanese university

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2010, 23:54
(C) Automakers elsewhere in the world have slowed the introduction of fuel-efficient technologies but have pressed ahead with research and development of them in preparation for a predicted rise in world oil prices.
Automakers elsewhere...a predicted rise in world oil prices.

which implies a supportive point that many other companies have acknowledged and tried to prevent this price problem from occuring whether the prediction is true or not.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2010, 06:18
IMO C. Only C tells us that automobile industries elsewhere are developing fuel efficient cars. Consequently when fuel prices rise people will opt for other than USA automobile industry

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2010, 22:27
Picked C........

It hurts US Automobile industry because ........others are doing research and also predicting rise in fuel price...

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2010, 22:50
C is for me.

The conclusion is that the particular reluctance of the United States automobile industry to do so, however, could threaten the industry's future. What option could best fit this conclusion?

A-prototype fuel-efficient car is revelant to the future issue. It mention that its materials are relatively costly. It weakens the point.
B-it is irrevelant to the future threaten for car manufacturer issue.
D-It is about future, but the issue of waste of car and light truck does not make sense.
E-it is irrevelant to the future threaten issue for car manufacturer issue.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2010, 03:15
Opted for C..

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 53

Location: Tbilisi, Georgia

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2010, 04:19
1
KUDOS
interesting explanations
_________________

Do your best, forget the rest!!

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 53

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 299

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 22:07
+1 for C

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 170

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 23:59
C is the best.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 40

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 416

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2010, 08:35
c....wrongly tagged in 700 club

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 380

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2010, 16:03
(A) provides additional information about fuel efficient cars but does not explain the threat

(B) Same as A.

(C) If automakers, in not one, not in two, but in every other country where cars are produced, believe in surge in oil pices, any reasonable person would assume that that future increase is at least probable. Obviously, this would be a downfall of U.S. auto industry for not mastering fuel-efficient technology.

(D) Irrelevant. These features might be true for both fuel-efficient and regular cars

(E) Private vs public transportation issue. Out!

_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Re: Q10/Test13/1000CR   [#permalink] 12 Aug 2010, 16:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Today s low gasoline prices make consumers willing to

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.