Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:11 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
baharalipour
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Last visit: 03 Apr 2017
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
235
 [233]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Leadership
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 3
Kudos: 235
 [233]
25
Kudos
Add Kudos
207
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,395
Own Kudos:
5,123
 [128]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,395
Kudos: 5,123
 [128]
85
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SouthCity
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Last visit: 20 Oct 2016
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
246
 [33]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 28
Kudos: 246
 [33]
31
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,514
Own Kudos:
5,728
 [23]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,514
Kudos: 5,728
 [23]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Srishti_15
Before reading the 2 options itself, I felt like the question could be solved, rendering the 2 pieces of information invalid. So, obviously I'm making a mistake. Please help me out with a solution.

Thank you!

We are given that initially the boxes were arranged in 12 stacks each. => No. of boxes(Before) is a multiple of 12. Or N = 12K.

Now, after the addition of 60 boxes, they are arranged in 14 stacks each. => No. of boxes(After) is a multiple of 14. Or N + 60 = 14K'.

We can say, we have 12K + 60 = 14K' --- (1)

Option 1 : No. of boxes BEFORE < 110.

or 12K < 110, we can have K = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

Out of these values only K = 2 and 9 ( satisfies the equation (1) above ). Hence, we have two values of K ==> INSUFFICIENT.

Option 2 : No. of boxes AFTER < 120.

or 14K < 120, we can have K = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Out of these values only K = 2 ( satisfies the equation (1) above ). Hence, we have only one value of K ==> SUFFICIENT.

Hence, answer is B.
User avatar
aniketm.87@gmail.com
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2016
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
803
 [22]
Given Kudos: 155
Posts: 67
Kudos: 803
 [22]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All boxes in a certain warehouse were arranged in stacks of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the warehouse were arranged in stacks of 14 boxes each, with no boxes left over. How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(A) There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
(B) There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.

Looks like a LCM problem :

Let x be the # of boxes before addition (multiple of 12) and let x + 60 be after addition
LCM : of 12 and 14 = 84
84 - 60 = 12 so atleast 12 boxes were present before another 60 were added

A) x < 110, x could be anything from 12(12*1 ====> 1 stack) to 108 (12*9 ===> 9 stacks)
multiple values —> not sufficient

B) x + 60 < 120, ======> we know that the LCM of 12 and 14 ====> 84 but this is for the least value of x
take the 2nd least value of x (next multiple of 12 ie 24)
LCM of 24 and 14 is 168 > 120, hence only one ans is possible ——> sufficient
General Discussion
avatar
Srishti_15
Joined: 03 Jun 2016
Last visit: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Before reading the 2 options itself, I felt like the question could be solved, rendering the 2 pieces of information invalid. So, obviously I'm making a mistake. Please help me out with a solution.

Thank you!

Attachment:
Capture1.PNG
Capture1.PNG [ 14.04 KiB | Viewed 61581 times ]
User avatar
sgrover18
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2017
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
128
 [11]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 29
Kudos: 128
 [11]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

Let us assume that the total number of boxes were "T".
Initially, they were stacked in R1 number of rows with 12 columns each. Therefore, 12*R1 = T
Now 60 boxes were added : T+60 or 12*R1 + 60.
Now they can be stacked in R2 number of rows with 14 columns each: 14*R2 = T

We can rewrite the equations above as: 12*R1+ 60 = 14* R2
Further: 12 ( R1 + 5) = 14 ( R2)

Now, WHENEVER you find an equation like this, know it is an LCM question. The first value when this equation will hold true will be the least common multiple of 12 & 14 = 84

************Why is it so ? When is 3*N = 4*M ?
N=4 & M=3. This is 12, which is the LCM of 3 & 4
*************

So the equation above will hold true when the total number of boxes ( after adding 60) are atleast 84 or multiples of 84.
84, 168 and so on.

Now, let us find out the values of R1 and R2 for 84, 168 etc. ( i will limit to the first two numbers)

84: R1= 2 & R2= 6
168: R1= 9 & R2=12


Now since the question asks for a unique value, let us look at the statements:

Statement1: 12*R1 < 110

This means that R1 can be any value less than or equal to 9. Since R2 can then have 2 values ( 6 & 12), we dont have a unique value for the total number of boxes.

Statement2: 14*R2 < 120

This means that R2 can be any value less than or equal to 8. This further implies that R1 has a unique value of 2. This is a sufficient statement.

B is our answer.


I hope you find this useful !
avatar
kaleem765
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 31 Oct 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
6
 [4]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The number of boxes before additional 60 boxes arrived was a multiple of 12.
The number of boxes after additional 60 boxes arrived was a multiple of 14.

So we need to find a multiple of 12, which after adding 60, becomes a multiple of 14.

Statement 1: The number of boxes before additional 60 boxes arrived is less than 110. There could be 24 or 108 boxes before additional 60 boxes arrived since adding 60 to any of these multiples of 12 yields a multiple of 14. Insufficient.

24 + 60 = 84
108 + 60 = 168

Statement 2: The number of boxes after additional 60 boxes arrived is less than 120. So the number of boxes before additional 60 boxes arrived is 24 since adding 60 to 24 gives 84, a multiple of 14. Sufficient

ANSWER: B
avatar
Hermes
Joined: 24 Dec 2017
Last visit: 12 Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
Given: 12x + 60 = 14y

y = 12(x + 5)/14 = 6(x + 5)/7

6 is not divisible by 7. So, (x + 5) has to be divisible by 7 --> (x + 5) = 7k
x = 7k - 5. Therefore x = 2, 9, 16, 23, ..........

St1: There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived. --> 12x < 110
When x = 2 --> 12x = 24 < 110
When x = 9 --> 12x = 108 < 110
When x = 16 --> 12x = 192 > 110
There are 2 possible values --> 24 or 108
Not Sufficient

St2: There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived. --> 12x + 60 < 120
When x = 2 --> 12x + 60 = 84 < 120
When x = 9 --> 12x + 60 = 168 > 120
There is only one possible value --> 84
Sufficient

Answer: B


"6 is not divisible by 7. So, (x + 5) has to be divisible by 7"

Why does (x + 5) need to be divisible by 7?

(2*6)/12 is an integer, and neither 2 or 6 is divisible by 12...?
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
6,647
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,647
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Hermes
I would like to help you out...

"6 is not divisible by 7. So, (x + 5) has to be divisible by 7"

Why does (x + 5) need to be divisible by 7 ?
this is because since 6 & 7 share no factor other than 0, i.e. 6 & 7 are coprime. hence (x+5) has to be divisible by 7 to make y an integer.

(2*6)/12 is an integer, and neither 2 or 6 is divisible by 12...?
In the example quoted by you, both 2 & 6 share factor of 2 with 12 (not coprime with 12). hence it is possible.

Hope it is clear now.

if you like my explanation, provide kudos :thumbup:


Hermes
Vyshak
Given: 12x + 60 = 14y

y = 12(x + 5)/14 = 6(x + 5)/7

6 is not divisible by 7. So, (x + 5) has to be divisible by 7 --> (x + 5) = 7k
x = 7k - 5. Therefore x = 2, 9, 16, 23, ..........

St1: There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived. --> 12x < 110
When x = 2 --> 12x = 24 < 110
When x = 9 --> 12x = 108 < 110
When x = 16 --> 12x = 192 > 110
There are 2 possible values --> 24 or 108
Not Sufficient

St2: There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived. --> 12x + 60 < 120
When x = 2 --> 12x + 60 = 84 < 120
When x = 9 --> 12x + 60 = 168 > 120
There is only one possible value --> 84
Sufficient

Answer: B


"6 is not divisible by 7. So, (x + 5) has to be divisible by 7"

Why does (x + 5) need to be divisible by 7?

(2*6)/12 is an integer, and neither 2 or 6 is divisible by 12...?
User avatar
KrishnakumarKA1
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 403
Own Kudos:
310
 [2]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 403
Kudos: 310
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution:
\(Given:\)
Let the number of boxes before the addition of 60 boxes = ‘12x’
Let the number of boxes after the addition of 60 boxes = ‘14y’
To find:
How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived? We need find basically the value of “12x”.
Inferences:
From the question statement we can get;
\(14y = 12x + 60\)
Dividing by “2”; we get;
\(7y = 6x + 30\)
\(7y = 6(x + 5)\)
Here we can see that 6 is not divisible by 7; hence “(x+5)” must be divisible by “7”.
\(x + 5 = 7c\);
\(x = 7c – 5\).
Here, ‘x’ can take the values 2, 9, 16, 23…………… which will satisfy the above equation.

Analysis of statement 1: There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
This means, "12x " must be less than 110."
Let's see by substituting the values for “x”.
When x = 2; ∴\(12x=24\) which is less than 110.
When x = 9; ∴\(12x=108\) which is less than 110.
When x = 16; ∴\(12x=192\) which is greater than 110.
Here we have 2 values which satisfy the condition; i.e. x can be equal to 2 or 9.
Hence statement 1 is not sufficient to answer. We can eliminate options A and D.

Analysis of statement 2: There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.
This means, "12x + 60 " must be less than 120."
Let's see by substituting the values for “x”.
When x = 2; ∴\(12x+60=84\) which is less than 120.
When x = 9; ∴\(12x+60=168\) which is greater than 120.
We have a unique answer for x. Hence the number of boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived = 84.
Hence statement 2 is sufficient to answer. We can eliminate the options C and E.

The correct answer option is “B”.
User avatar
ravi546
Joined: 11 Jul 2018
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
inakihernandez
All the boxes in a supermarket are arranged in packs of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After new 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the supermarket were arranged in packs of 14. How many boxes were in the supermarket before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes BEFORE the 60 additional boxes arrived.

(2) There were fewer than 120 boxes AFTER the 60 additional boxes arrived.

You can use the "integer solutions" concept to simplify the question. Check: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2011/06 ... -of-thumb/

12a + 60 = 14b
We need to find 12a.

14b - 12a = 60
7b - 6a = 30

First obvious solution : a = -5, b = 0
For next solution increase a by 7 and b by 6 to get a = 2, b = 6
Repeat for next solution. Increase a by 7 and b by 6 to get a = 9, b = 12
and so on...

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes BEFORE the 60 additional boxes arrived.
12a is less than 110 so a is less than 9.something.
a can be 2 or 9. Not sufficient.

(2) There were fewer than 120 boxes AFTER the 60 additional boxes arrived.
14b is less than 120 so b is less than 8.something.
b must be 6. Sufficient.

Answer (B)

From my experience in practicing DS problems, I realised that we cannot assume anything. So, is it fair to assume that there are no boxes left after the boxes are arranged in 14 per group?
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,509
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
baharalipour
All boxes in a certain warehouse were arranged in stacks of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the warehouse were arranged in stacks of 14 boxes each, with no boxes left over. How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
(1) There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.

Given: All boxes in a certain warehouse were arranged in stacks of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the warehouse were arranged in stacks of 14 boxes each, with no boxes left over.

Asked: How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
Boxes = 12k; k is a positive integer
12k + 60 = 14m; m is a positive integer
6k + 30 = 7m
k=2; m=6
k=9; m=12
Boxes before the 60 additional arrived = {24,108}
NOT SUFFICIENT


(1) There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.
Boxes = 12k; k is a positive integer
12k + 60 = 14m; m is a positive integer
6k + 30 = 7m
k=2; m=6
k=9; m=12
Boxes before the 60 additional arrived = 84
SUFFICIENT

IMO B
avatar
JackieO
Joined: 05 Sep 2019
Last visit: 19 Jan 2022
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's say there are N boxes. According to the stem, N = 12a and N+60 = 14b where a and b are positive integers.

Now, consider this logic: if X = 3k + 1 and X = 4z + 3 then I can cenrtainly say that X = 12y + 10. Where k,z and y are positive. integers.

N+60 = 14b Or, N = 14b-56-4 Or, N = 14(b-4) - 4 Or, N = 14c - 4 Or, N = 14c - 14+10 Or, N = 14d +10. where d is a positive integer, meaning that N leaves a remainder of 10 when divided by 14.

N = 12a and N = 14d + 10
Hence, N = 168m + 24 using the logic above.

(1) Is sufficient now. N < 110 then N must be 24
Bunuel can you please point out flaws in my reasoning? I really don't get where I'm faltering...
avatar
sdsdssdds
Joined: 20 Nov 2015
Last visit: 20 Nov 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 2
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

Would you have by any chance any similar questions with which it is possible to train?

Thank you
avatar
babloorudra
Joined: 26 Jun 2019
Last visit: 02 Aug 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 13
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhimahna
Srishti_15
Before reading the 2 options itself, I felt like the question could be solved, rendering the 2 pieces of information invalid. So, obviously I'm making a mistake. Please help me out with a solution.

Thank you!

We are given that initially the boxes were arranged in 12 stacks each. => No. of boxes(Before) is a multiple of 12. Or N = 12K.

Now, after the addition of 60 boxes, they are arranged in 14 stacks each. => No. of boxes(After) is a multiple of 14. Or N + 60 = 14K'.

We can say, we have 12K + 60 = 14K' --- (1)

Option 1 : No. of boxes BEFORE < 110.

or 12K < 110, we can have K = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

Out of these values only K = 2 and 9 ( satisfies the equation (1) above ). Hence, we have two values of K ==> INSUFFICIENT.

Option 2 : No. of boxes AFTER < 120.

or 14K < 120, we can have K = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Out of these values only K = 2 ( satisfies the equation (1) above ). Hence, we have only one value of K ==> SUFFICIENT.

Hence, answer is B.

I have a doubt here. For the first option, why do we have just 2 options for (A). Since we are checking for the number of boxes before the arrival of 60 boxes, we could have 9 options right? from 12,24,36.... 108. Only after the arrival of 60 boxes the bopxes are stacked in the ,multiples of 14 and hence the equation becomes 12x+60=14y.

Please let me know where I am going wrong
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
baharalipour
All boxes in a certain warehouse were arranged in stacks of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the warehouse were arranged in stacks of 14 boxes each, with no boxes left over. How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
(2) There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.

When a multiple of 12 (the original number of boxes) is increased by 60, the result is a multiple of 14 (the new number of boxes):
12x + 60 = 14y
6x + 30 = 7y
6(x+5) = 7y

Since the left side must be equal to a multiple of 7, x+5 must be equal to a multiple of 7.
Two smallest cases:
Case 1: x=2, with the result that x+5=7
Original number of boxes = 12x = 12*2 = 24
New number of boxes after the 60-box increase = 24+60 = 84

Case 2: x=9, with the result that x+5=14
Original number of boxes = 12x = 12*9 = 108
New number of boxes after the 60-box increase = 108+60 = 168

Statement 1: There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived
Cases 1 and 2 both satisfy the condition that the original number of boxes is less than 110.
Since the original number of boxes can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.
Only Case 1 satisfies the condition that the new number of boxes is less than 120.
In Case 1, the original number of boxes = 24
SUFFICIENT.

User avatar
ppch
Joined: 16 Oct 2019
Last visit: 07 Nov 2025
Posts: 14
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 14
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All boxes in a certain warehouse were arranged in stacks of 12 boxes each, with no boxes left over. After 60 additional boxes arrived and no boxes were removed, all the boxes in the warehouse were arranged in stacks of 14 boxes each, with no boxes left over. How many boxes were in the warehouse before the 60 additional boxes arrived?

(1) There were fewer than 110 boxes in the warehouse before the 60 additional arrived.
(2) There were fewer than 120 boxes in the warehouse after the 60 additional arrived.

As per (1): 12k < 110 i.e. no. of boxes could be 12, 24, 36, 48, 60,72, 84, 96 & 108
12k+60 = 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156 & 168
12k+60 must be divisible by 14 for arranging them in a stack of 14. 84 and 168 are the two choices - not
sufficient


As per (2): 12k+60<120 i.e. no. of boxes could be 72, 84, 96, 108
12k+60 must be divisible by 14 for arranging them in a stack of 14. 84 is the only choice - sufficient

B is the right answer
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,587
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,587
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts