Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:58 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,296
 [14]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,296
 [14]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
alizakhatoon
Joined: 07 Feb 2021
Last visit: 10 Dec 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 11
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,296
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,296
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,296
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,296
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Q2. Which of the following facts about colorectal cancer can be disproved by the passage?

Explanation

The passage states that the majority of cases occur in the over- 50s, and given that there are said to be a total of 9,000 cases a year, more than 4,500 of these would be aged 50 or more. Statement A is not disproved by the passage, because although the disease may be more common among men, this does not necessarily imply that it would be a more common form of cancer for men than women when compared with other cancers. Equally, statement D refers to the number of people treated and more women may be treated even though more men contract the illness.

Answer: C
User avatar
Prob2303
Joined: 16 May 2023
Last visit: 15 Sep 2024
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 63
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Sajjad,

Can I get a brief summary of the passage?
User avatar
Lodz697
Joined: 11 Oct 2023
Last visit: 24 Aug 2024
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 95
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.77
Posts: 43
Kudos: 192
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow. Nice Passage. I really struggled with the last one, but made it!

Lesgo
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,296
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Prob2303
Hello Sajjad,

Can I get a brief summary of the passage?

­Summary of the Passage

Colorectal cancer, more prevalent in men and those over 50, is influenced by factors like lack of exercise, excessive weight, and genetic predisposition. While high-fiber diets were once believed to reduce risk, recent understanding highlights the negative impact of excessive red meat and dairy consumption. Lifestyle factors associated with high-fiber diets may contribute to lower risks. Today, health experts emphasize the role of excessive alcohol consumption as a major risk factor for colorectal cancer.­
User avatar
manish8242
Joined: 07 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 48
Posts: 48
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I did not get the explanation of Q1

It is said old view -> High Fiber -> less risk
New view/finding -> Red meat/milk prod (High fiber) -> more risk
reason for old view is people who have High fibre generally avoid red meat and other stuffs which proves to be reducing risk.
But how can we say it has no adverse affect? infact it do has adverse effect. We can only say it can't have inverse relation. Means author may agree that there is no inverse relation. But no adverse relation seems wrong bcz high fibre like red meat indeed increases risk.


Sajjad1994
Official Explanation

Q1. The author would agree that:

Explanation

An adverse association is one in which harm results, an inverse association brings benefits, no adverse association means no harm, and while the author would not agree that an inverse association exists, he would agree that a diet of fiber does not bring an increase in risk.

Answer: D
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,296
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

Q1. The author would agree that:

Passage summary:

  • Colorectal cancer risk factors: little exercise, excessive weight, family history, diet.
  • Previously: high fiber thought to greatly reduce risk.
  • Now: too much red meat and milk products increases risk more significantly.
  • High fiber diets correlate with less red meat/dairy and other healthy lifestyle factors.
  • Key sentence: “If there is any accepted truism regarding diet, lifestyle and the risk of contracting colorectal cancer then it is no longer the view that eating lots of fiber has an inverse association.”
  • Today: focus on risk factors like high alcohol consumption.

A: The passage says the old view was that it greatly reduced risk, but now the focus is on red meat/dairy/alcohol risks. It doesn’t say fiber may protect, it implies the fiber effect may have been due to other correlated factors. So A is not supported.

B: This is the old view, now rejected. So B is contradicted.

C: This is tricky wording. The passage says: “If there is any accepted truism ... then it is no longer the view that eating lots of fiber has an inverse association.” That means the old truism (fiber reduces risk) is gone, but it doesn’t say there’s no accepted truism at all — there might be new ones (like alcohol increases risk). So C says “no longer an accepted truism” in general, which is too broad — the passage only says the fiber truism is gone. So C is not exactly right.

D: The passage never says fiber increases risk — it just says the protective effect is no longer accepted. So “no adverse association” means fiber doesn’t increase risk, which is consistent with the passage. This seems true: they don’t claim fiber is harmful.

E: The passage only discusses colorectal cancer, not heart disease. It might be true in reality, but the author doesn’t state or imply this in the passage. So E is out of scope.

Answer: D
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts