Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:48 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,377
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,377
Kudos: 778,143
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
daysleisure
Joined: 23 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Jan 2024
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 7
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Singh997
Joined: 28 Jan 2022
Last visit: 10 Sep 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 18
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
acf840
Joined: 18 Feb 2022
Last visit: 26 Oct 2022
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
67
 [2]
Given Kudos: 39
Products:
Posts: 40
Kudos: 67
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although I almost selected A, but correct answer should be C, as intricate and perfectly designed are used to modify the hulls of the ships and not the ships themselves. Except C & E all other options are modifying ships. With A, it sounds like ships are intricate and perfectly designed.

Also, "so intricate and perfectly designed" is correctly used for hulls. "Having been designed" is incorrect in option E.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Varane
Joined: 24 Mar 2022
Last visit: 16 Dec 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 471
Posts: 66
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Need official explanation for this question.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AbhishekRaut95
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Last visit: 05 Mar 2023
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GMAT 2: 750 Q45 V49
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '23 (D)
GMAT 2: 750 Q45 V49
Posts: 23
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In my humble opinion, the trick to answering this question is to identify what exactly absorbs the radar waves. Now, looking back at the sentence we identify many nouns which could be the proper antecedents: corvettes, ships and hulls. The option that logically fits the bill is - hull. The carbon fiber hull absorbs the waves. Options C and E make it clear. Out of them Option C is a no brainer.

Forgive me if my explanation is incorrect. Have a great journey.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,377
Own Kudos:
778,143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,377
Kudos: 778,143
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Tenses

Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that “hulls” (and not “corvettes”) were intricately and perfectly designed; hence, “so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them” must clearly modify “hulls”; only choices C and E do that.

    • “so A that B” is a correct, idiomatic construction.
    • In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
    • An adjective can only modify a noun; it cannot modify another adjective; to modify an adjective, an adverb must be used; generally, adjective+ly leads to an adverb.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed so intricately and perfectly” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

B. Trap. This answer incorrectly uses the adjectives “intricate” and “perfect” rather than their adverb forms to modify the verb “designed”.

C. Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that” to modify the noun “hulls”, preserving the intended meaning of the sentence- that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed. Further, through this modification, Option C avoids pronoun ambiguity by directly modifying the second instance of the noun “hulls” with the phrase “so intricate and perfectly designed” and maintains a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”.

D. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed in such an intricate and perfect manner” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

E. This answer choice fails to maintain a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the present perfect continuous tense verb “having been designed” to refer to an action that occurred in the past; the simple past tense is needed here.

C is the best answer choice.
avatar
Varane
Joined: 24 Mar 2022
Last visit: 16 Dec 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 471
Posts: 66
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Use of which would have been better? That would have avoided the redundancy of using hulls twice.

The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, which are so intricate and perfectly designed that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,377
Own Kudos:
778,143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,377
Kudos: 778,143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Video Explanation:

User avatar
Kushchokhani
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Apr 2024
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Posts: 513
Kudos: 644
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Tenses

Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that “hulls” (and not “corvettes”) were intricately and perfectly designed; hence, “so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them” must clearly modify “hulls”; only choices C and E do that.

    • “so A that B” is a correct, idiomatic construction.
    • In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
    • An adjective can only modify a noun; it cannot modify another adjective; to modify an adjective, an adverb must be used; generally, adjective+ly leads to an adverb.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed so intricately and perfectly” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

B. Trap. This answer incorrectly uses the adjectives “intricate” and “perfect” rather than their adverb forms to modify the verb “designed”.

C. Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that” to modify the noun “hulls”, preserving the intended meaning of the sentence- that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed. Further, through this modification, Option C avoids pronoun ambiguity by directly modifying the second instance of the noun “hulls” with the phrase “so intricate and perfectly designed” and maintains a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”.

D. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed in such an intricate and perfect manner” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

E. This answer choice fails to maintain a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the present perfect continuous tense verb “having been designed” to refer to an action that occurred in the past; the simple past tense is needed here.

C is the best answer choice.
ExpertsGlobal5

I would start by appreciating the thoughts put behind in framing this ques. I have clearly understood the reasons behind incorrect answer choices. However, my query is wrt the correct answer choice i.e. C.

Choice C seems incomplete. "The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes" followed by modifier+modifier. Normally, complete sentence would be boasts of....that...

Further, the sentence construction --- independent clause + , + modifier + , + modifier --- looks weird (also, as stated above, independent clause is so short and seems incomplete). Can you please provide few correct GMAT-like sentences involving this construction? TIA
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kushchokhani
Bunuel
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Tenses

Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that “hulls” (and not “corvettes”) were intricately and perfectly designed; hence, “so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them” must clearly modify “hulls”; only choices C and E do that.

    • “so A that B” is a correct, idiomatic construction.
    • In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
    • An adjective can only modify a noun; it cannot modify another adjective; to modify an adjective, an adverb must be used; generally, adjective+ly leads to an adverb.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed so intricately and perfectly” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

B. Trap. This answer incorrectly uses the adjectives “intricate” and “perfect” rather than their adverb forms to modify the verb “designed”.

C. Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that” to modify the noun “hulls”, preserving the intended meaning of the sentence- that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed. Further, through this modification, Option C avoids pronoun ambiguity by directly modifying the second instance of the noun “hulls” with the phrase “so intricate and perfectly designed” and maintains a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”.

D. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed in such an intricate and perfect manner” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

E. This answer choice fails to maintain a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the present perfect continuous tense verb “having been designed” to refer to an action that occurred in the past; the simple past tense is needed here.

C is the best answer choice.
ExpertsGlobal5

I would start by appreciating the thoughts put behind in framing this ques. I have clearly understood the reasons behind incorrect answer choices. However, my query is wrt the correct answer choice i.e. C.

Choice C seems incomplete. "The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes" followed by modifier+modifier. Normally, complete sentence would be boasts of....that...

Further, the sentence construction --- independent clause + , + modifier + , + modifier --- looks weird (also, as stated above, independent clause is so short and seems incomplete). Can you please provide few correct GMAT-like sentences involving this construction? TIA

Hello Kushchokhani,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, Option C forms a perfectly complete sentence.

This sentence begins with one independent clause - "The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes" - then, the noun phrase "Visby-class corvettes" is modified by the appositive "ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls"; in turn, the noun phrase "carbon fiber stealth hulls" at the end of this phrase is modified by the appositive "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed...".

One simple example of such a sentence is "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, a type of flying insect."

Here, the independent clause is "John has malaria"; "malaria" is modified by the appositive "a tropical disease spread by mosquitos"; "mosquitos" is then modified by the appositive "a type of flying insect".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Kushchokhani
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Apr 2024
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Posts: 513
Kudos: 644
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
One simple example of such a sentence is "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, a type of flying insect."
Though the above example seems fine, the original question seems to be of the construction- "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, mosquitos so poisonous that humans are almost killed by them." making it awkward.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kushchokhani
ExpertsGlobal5
One simple example of such a sentence is "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, a type of flying insect."
Though the above example seems fine, the original question seems to be of the construction- "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, mosquitos so poisonous that humans are almost killed by them." making it awkward.

Hello Kushchokhani,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit more clarity, Option C modifies "carbon fiber stealth hulls" with the appositive "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed..." to explain what "carbon fiber stealth hulls"; while this construction may be a bit awkward, it is perfectly grammatical and conveys the intended meaning.

Remember, on GMAT, it is not advisable to "play it by ear"; answer choices that may sound strange to us can be perfectly grammatical, and those that sound awkward can be perfectly correct.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Kushchokhani
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Apr 2024
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Posts: 513
Kudos: 644
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
Kushchokhani
ExpertsGlobal5
One simple example of such a sentence is "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, a type of flying insect."
Though the above example seems fine, the original question seems to be of the construction- "John has malaria, a tropical disease spread by mosquitos, mosquitos so poisonous that humans are almost killed by them." making it awkward.

Hello Kushchokhani,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit more clarity, Option C modifies "carbon fiber stealth hulls" with the appositive "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed..." to explain what "carbon fiber stealth hulls"; while this construction may be a bit awkward, it is perfectly grammatical and conveys the intended meaning.

Remember, on GMAT, it is not advisable to "play it by ear"; answer choices that may sound strange to us can be perfectly grammatical, and those that sound awkward can be perfectly correct.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Okay, I understand that. However, I am still confused as "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them" seems to be a mix of independent and dependent clause. The bold part seems to be independent, thereby it seems that complete correct sentence has comma splice issue.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,762
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kushchokhani

Okay, I understand that. However, I am still confused as "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them" seems to be a mix of independent and dependent clause. The bold part seems to be independent, thereby it seems that complete correct sentence has comma splice issue.

Hello Kushchokhani,

We hope this finds you well.

To clear up your doubt "hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them" is not a run on (as you might note, this phrase does not actually contain a comma); rather, it is a noun phrase - the main noun of the phrase is "hulls", and this noun is acted upon by the construction "so A that B", and idiomatic construction that describes cause (A) and effect (B).

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Gio96
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 36
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Tenses

Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that “hulls” (and not “corvettes”) were intricately and perfectly designed; hence, “so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them” must clearly modify “hulls”; only choices C and E do that.

    • “so A that B” is a correct, idiomatic construction.
    • In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
    • An adjective can only modify a noun; it cannot modify another adjective; to modify an adjective, an adverb must be used; generally, adjective+ly leads to an adverb.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed so intricately and perfectly” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

B. Trap. This answer incorrectly uses the adjectives “intricate” and “perfect” rather than their adverb forms to modify the verb “designed”.

C. Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that” to modify the noun “hulls”, preserving the intended meaning of the sentence- that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed. Further, through this modification, Option C avoids pronoun ambiguity by directly modifying the second instance of the noun “hulls” with the phrase “so intricate and perfectly designed” and maintains a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”.

D. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed in such an intricate and perfect manner” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

E. This answer choice fails to maintain a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the present perfect continuous tense verb “having been designed” to refer to an action that occurred in the past; the simple past tense is needed here.

C is the best answer choice.

Hi Expert, I marked choice A because I though that a verb-ed modifier, unlike a verb-ing modifier, sometimes can modifies the preceding noun entity even if we have a comma. Could we say that choice A is incorrect since there is no clear antecedent for the verb-ed modifier but accept the fact that sometimes it can modify the preceding noun entity?

Regards.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,762
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gio96
Bunuel
Bunuel
The Swedish Navy boasts of two Visby-class corvettes, ships with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them.

(A) hulls, designed so intricately and perfectly
(B) hulls that are designed so intricate and perfect
(C) hulls, hulls so intricate and perfectly designed
(D) hulls, designed in such an intricate and perfect manner
(E) hulls, hulls having been designed intricately and perfectly so


 


This Month's Questions are Sponsored by
Experts' Global for the GMAT Club SC Butler

 

Experts Global

 



Project SC Butler


For SC butler Questions Click Here

Expert's Global Official Explanation:

Meaning + Modifiers + Tenses

Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that “hulls” (and not “corvettes”) were intricately and perfectly designed; hence, “so intricately and perfectly that radar waves are almost completely absorbed by them” must clearly modify “hulls”; only choices C and E do that.

    • “so A that B” is a correct, idiomatic construction.
    • In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
    • An adjective can only modify a noun; it cannot modify another adjective; to modify an adjective, an adverb must be used; generally, adjective+ly leads to an adverb.

A. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed so intricately and perfectly” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

B. Trap. This answer incorrectly uses the adjectives “intricate” and “perfect” rather than their adverb forms to modify the verb “designed”.

C. Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase “hulls so intricate and perfectly designed that” to modify the noun “hulls”, preserving the intended meaning of the sentence- that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed. Further, through this modification, Option C avoids pronoun ambiguity by directly modifying the second instance of the noun “hulls” with the phrase “so intricate and perfectly designed” and maintains a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”.

D. Trap. This answer choice incorrectly uses the phrase “designed in such an intricate and perfect manner” to modify the noun “ships” rather than the noun “hulls”, altering the sentence to incorrectly imply that the ships are designed in an intricate and perfect manner; the intended meaning is that the hulls are intricate and perfectly designed.

E. This answer choice fails to maintain a correct, idiomatic construction “so A that B”. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the present perfect continuous tense verb “having been designed” to refer to an action that occurred in the past; the simple past tense is needed here.

C is the best answer choice.

Hi Expert, I marked choice A because I though that a verb-ed modifier, unlike a verb-ing modifier, sometimes can modifies the preceding noun entity even if we have a comma. Could we say that choice A is incorrect since there is no clear antecedent for the verb-ed modifier but accept the fact that sometimes it can modify the preceding noun entity?

Regards.

Hello Gio96,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, this reasoning is not exactly correct.

The noun phrase that precedes the modifier "designed so..." takes the form of a noun ("ships") modified by a prepositional phrase ("with highly effective, carbon fiber stealth hulls"), so the modifier acts upon the main noun of the phrase.

For example, "The patient in bed 3, diagnosed with dengue, is calling the nurse.": here, "diagnosed" refers to "patient", not "bed 3".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Gio96
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 36
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you, I thought that a verb-ing or verb-ed modifier could modify also a prepositional phrase of a noun.

My doubt came with a sentence such as:
"He is considered the most intelligent people for his work, viewed by almost 10 million people".

Could we say that this sentence is correct and the verb-ed modifies the noun work? If yes, what is the difference between the two?

Regards.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,762
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,762
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gio96
Thank you, I thought that a verb-ing or verb-ed modifier could modify also a prepositional phrase of a noun.

My doubt came with a sentence such as:
"He is considered the most intelligent people for his work, viewed by almost 10 million people".

Could we say that this sentence is correct and the verb-ed modifies the noun work? If yes, what is the difference between the two?

Regards.

Hello Gio96,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, this sentence could arguably be considered correct.

What makes this sentence different is that "for his work" is an adverbial phrase: it modifies the action "is considered the most intelligent people" rather than the pronoun "He". This means that the noun "work" is not part of a noun/pronoun phrase with a different main noun, so the particle can act directly on "work".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Ruchi007
Joined: 06 Nov 2021
Last visit: 20 Apr 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 370
Location: India
WE:Marketing (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 51
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel In A, how is "designed" referring to the ships? Can you please elaborate on the concept?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts