Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT 
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Updated on: 31 Mar 2025, 01:39
Originally posted by purplelemonsoda on 02 Sep 2024, 06:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 31 Mar 2025, 01:39, edited 7 times in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 31 Mar 2025, 01:39, edited 7 times in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
City X needs to increase its population of residents. Our new approach to promoting this goal is to offer incentives specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration to the city from the surrounding area has been greater than migration from the city to the surrounding area. To further this approach, we plan to provide the following incentives:
- increase the availability of resources for women entrepreneurs
- improve the city’s primary (elementary) schools
- improve services for citizens over 45 years of age
- improve services for low-income earners
- improve the city’s roads to facilitate quicker commutes
- increase the availability of resources for women entrepreneurs
- improve the city’s primary (elementary) schools
- improve services for citizens over 45 years of age
- improve services for low-income earners
- improve the city’s roads to facilitate quicker commutes
Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
73% (02:56) correct
27%
(02:49)
wrong
based on 1228
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Each of the following describes a possible contributor to the cities’ goals of population growth and diversity. Which of them is most clearly NOT addressed by either of the cities’ plans?
| Migration to and from the respective city’s surrounding area | |
| Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area | |
| Migration due to opportunities for continuing education | |
| Migration by families with children due to the relative quality of available schools | |
| Migration due to frustration with traffic congestion |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Migration to and from places outside of the respective city’s surrounding area
City Schools: Yes
Residents’ ages: Yes
Income levels: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
88% (00:48) correct
12%
(00:57)
wrong
based on 1167
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following, select Yes if it describes an aspect to which BOTH the City X plan and City Y plan pay explicit attention. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| City Schools | ||
| Residents’ ages | ||
| Income levels |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
City Schools: Yes
Residents’ ages: Yes
Income levels: No
30-34 (age in years): No
Children aged 0-5 in same residence: Yes
Children aged 6-17 in same residence: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
39% (01:52) correct
61%
(01:48)
wrong
based on 1501
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For each of the following factors listed in the Migration Patterns tab, select Yes if the data presented with respect to this factor clearly suggests that City Y’S incentives are appropriately targeted, given the city’s stated approach. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| 30-34 (age in years) | ||
| Children aged 0-5 in same residence | ||
| Children aged 6-17 in same residence |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
30-34 (age in years): No
Children aged 0-5 in same residence: Yes
Children aged 6-17 in same residence: Yes
Attachment:
2024-09-02_18-49-04.png [ 119.94 KiB | Viewed 14243 times ]
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-kw2qvmpy.png [ 74.7 KiB | Viewed 6967 times ]
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-5kq8jopr.png [ 153.53 KiB | Viewed 6951 times ]
Trying to understand why the right answer is right?
GMAT Club Tests explanations walk through concepts, shortcuts, and common traps on many questions.
See how →
Updated on: 23 Sep 2025, 00:13
Originally posted by Vedant_Wankhede on 03 Sep 2024, 11:57.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2025, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2025, 00:13, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 3:
Question stem simplification :
For each factor we need to select Yes if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or else No
How do we know if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or not refer to Tab2 for this
City Y states the criteria that "incentives are specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration from the city to the surrounding area has been greater than migration to the city from the surrounding area."
Data in the migrations tab helps us this for each factor individually
30-34 (age in years) : We know (From Y %) is 5% and (to City Y %) is 15%, Hence the population migration from city Y(From Y %)to the surrounding has has been less than the population migration to the city Y (to City Y %) from surrounding
Hence for each factor to be specifcally targeted if (From Y %) > (to City Y %) select "Yes" else "No"
As it can be observed for the rest of the options
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
Question stem simplification :
For each factor we need to select Yes if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or else No
How do we know if the incentives of Y are specifically targeted or not refer to Tab2 for this
City Y states the criteria that "incentives are specifically targeted to individuals from population sectors in which migration from the city to the surrounding area has been greater than migration to the city from the surrounding area."
Data in the migrations tab helps us this for each factor individually
30-34 (age in years) : We know (From Y %) is 5% and (to City Y %) is 15%, Hence the population migration from city Y(From Y %)to the surrounding has has been less than the population migration to the city Y (to City Y %) from surrounding
Hence for each factor to be specifcally targeted if (From Y %) > (to City Y %) select "Yes" else "No"
As it can be observed for the rest of the options
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
05 Sep 2024, 19:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q3:
The key criterion for selecting "Yes" is whether the percentage of people migrating from City Y (From Y %) is greater than the percentage of people migrating to City Y (To Y %). If the migration from City Y is higher than the migration to City Y, it means that City Y’s incentives are appropriately targeted, as they are designed to focus on population groups where more people are leaving than arriving, to help retain or attract them.
Let’s apply this criterion to each factor:
30-34 (age in years):
From City Y (%): 5%
To City Y (%): 15%
The percentage of people moving to City Y is higher than those moving away from it. Therefore, City Y’s policy is not specifically targeted at this group, since more people are moving in than out.
The answer should be “No.”
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
From City Y (%): 11%
To City Y (%): 3%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (11%) is greater than the percentage of people moving in (3%). This means City Y has lost more families with children aged 0-5, so their incentives are appropriately targeted at this group.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
From City Y (%): 9%
To City Y (%): 5%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (9%) is greater than those moving in (5%), indicating that City Y’s policy is targeted at the right group since more people are leaving.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Final Answers:
30-34 age group: No
Children aged 0-5: Yes
Children aged 6-17: Yes
The key criterion for selecting "Yes" is whether the percentage of people migrating from City Y (From Y %) is greater than the percentage of people migrating to City Y (To Y %). If the migration from City Y is higher than the migration to City Y, it means that City Y’s incentives are appropriately targeted, as they are designed to focus on population groups where more people are leaving than arriving, to help retain or attract them.
Let’s apply this criterion to each factor:
30-34 (age in years):
From City Y (%): 5%
To City Y (%): 15%
The percentage of people moving to City Y is higher than those moving away from it. Therefore, City Y’s policy is not specifically targeted at this group, since more people are moving in than out.
The answer should be “No.”
Children aged 0-5 in same residence
From City Y (%): 11%
To City Y (%): 3%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (11%) is greater than the percentage of people moving in (3%). This means City Y has lost more families with children aged 0-5, so their incentives are appropriately targeted at this group.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Children aged 6-17 in same residence
From City Y (%): 9%
To City Y (%): 5%
The percentage of people moving away from City Y (9%) is greater than those moving in (5%), indicating that City Y’s policy is targeted at the right group since more people are leaving.
The answer should be “Yes.”
Final Answers:
30-34 age group: No
Children aged 0-5: Yes
Children aged 6-17: Yes
