Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0803:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
15 Full-length GMAT FE mocks with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jun 0808:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Mon/Wed June 8, 2026 →August 12, 2026 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
Jun 1012:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Thought your job leaves no time for GMAT prep? After multiple GMAT attempts and a demanding consulting job, Kshitij improved to 695 in under 2 months. Learn the mindset shifts, study strategy, and execution changes that made the breakthrough possible.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..- Jun 10
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Scoring 715 on the GMAT Focus Edition requires more than just learning formulas, memorizing concepts, or solving hundreds of questions. In this episode, Nishant shares how he improved his GMAT preparation by focusing on application of concepts, and more. 
Jun 1101:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
07 May 2025, 05:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.: Describes Group Discussion
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.: Describes Group Discussion
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.: Describes Group Discussion
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
50% (02:43) correct
50%
(02:46)
wrong
based on 216
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The table summarizes the results of a university's recent study on different methods used to teach first-year college students across four academic subjects. Each student was taught using exactly one of four instructional methods. For each subject, the effectiveness of a given method is measured by the average final exam score of students taught using that method. A method is considered optimal for a subject if it yields the highest average final exam score among the four methods for that subject.
Average Final Exam Score by Teaching Method:
Each of the following options is a description of exactly one of the four instructional methods.
For each option, select Describes Group Discussion if the given information indicates that the description is true of the Group Discussion method. Otherwise, select Does not describe Group Discussion.
Average Final Exam Score by Teaching Method:
| Subject | Lecture | Group Discussion | Online Module | Case Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| History | 76 | 82 | 74 | 79 |
| Biology | 85 | 81 | 78 | 88 |
| Economics | 77 | 79 | 73 | 74 |
| Psychology | 80 | 83 | 79 | 81 |
| Sociology | 75 | 77 | 80 | 76 |
| Philosophy | 82 | 78 | 76 | 85 |
Each of the following options is a description of exactly one of the four instructional methods.
For each option, select Describes Group Discussion if the given information indicates that the description is true of the Group Discussion method. Otherwise, select Does not describe Group Discussion.
| Describes Group Discussion | Does Not Describe Group Discussion | |
| Was the optimal method for at least three subjects. | ||
| Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy. | ||
| Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.: Describes Group Discussion
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.: Describes Group Discussion
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.: Describes Group Discussion
15 May 2025, 02:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Statement 1:
Was the optimal method for at least three subjects.
- Group Discussion scores highest in History (82), Economics (79) and Psychology (83).
Statement 2:
Had the second-lowest score for Philosophy.
- Philosophy scores:
- Lecture: 82
- Group Discussion: 78
- Online Module: 76
- Case Study: 85
- Group Discussion is the second-lowest after Online Module.
Statement 3:
Produced the highest score for any subject where Case Study was the second-best method.
- Identify subjects where Case Study was second-highest:
- History: Case Study (79) is second to Group Discussion (82) → Group Discussion highest.
- Biology: Case Study (88) is highest, not second.
- Economics: Case Study (74) is third.
- Psychology: Case Study (81) is second to Group Discussion (83) → Group Discussion highest.
- Sociology: Case Study (76) is third.
- Philosophy: Case Study (85) is highest, not second.
- In both History and Psychology, Group Discussion produced the highest score when Case Study was second.
Moderators:
344 posts
