I have an acceptance from Columbia and am currently in the interview process for Wharton, so this is a bit premature, but I'd like to get some guidance on the differences between these schools for my career goals.
I'd like to work at a hedge fund post-graduation (likely value or event-driven). Currently, I am at a well known fund in an investment role, but not doing direct investment research. So I have to make a functional, but not an industry pivot to get the role I want.
Wharton has a great reputation and the undergraduate network as well, which is very strong. Columbia has a great value investing program (though not quite sure how the industry views it) and is located in NYC, which provides great access for school-year internships. It also seems to have a decent hedge fund network.
I live in NYC now and would have a personal preference to stay (family, etc.), so unless Wharton provides me with a meaningful advantage vis-a-vis career options or a fellowship, I'd probably choose Columbia. What do others think?
Oh and I am also in the process for Chicago, but have largely discarded that option because of its location an its poor placement into hedge funds (career report shows only 2 people took jobs in HF/Mutual Funds in each of 2011 and 2012). Am I crazy for doing that? Is there something that I'm missing? TBC - it's a great school, but it just seems like Columbia is the stronger choice for what I want to do.
i agree with you on the assessment of wharton vs columbia - only because i have an accomplished friend with pe experience at wharton now who is trying to get into hedge funds and wishes he'd done cbs's value investing program.. i think cbs gives you what you need