As part of a joint process two museums - Museo metropolitano (MM) and

Question

As part of a joint planning process, two museums-Museo Metropolitano (MM) and the Fundación Arte (FA)-have decided to require that future exhibits at each museum be directly connected to the strengths of their permanent collections. MM's strengths are East Asian printmaking, 19th-century European painting, and 18th-century US painting and sculpture; the FA's strengths are 20th-century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, and art from 14th-century South America.

In addition, MM's next exhibit must be devoted to something other than European or US art and be restricted to the 20th-century. FA's next exhibit must be devoted to art that is abstract, or at least art that is not fully representational (e.g., semiabstract or semirepresentational), preferably including at least some art by US
women.

For each of the two museums, select a work that could be included in that museum's next exhibit without violating any of its requirement for exhibits. Make only two selections in each column.

KarishmaB · Accepted Answer

We are given requirements (and preference) for MM and FA exhibits.

MM Requirements  :

- Related to East Asian printmaking, 19th-century European  maintaining  (is it painting instead?), and the 18th century US painting and sculpture
- devoted to something other than European or US art 
- be restricted to the 20th century

FA Requirements:

- 20th century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, and art from 14th-century South America
- devoted to art that is abstract, or at least art that is not fully representational (e.g. semi-abstract or semirepresentational) 
Preference: including at least some art by US women.

The question asks us to find exhibits that do not violate requirements. They may or may be as per preference. Also note that in this question, time must be spent in evaluating each artefact against the requirements of the two. Only a cursory glance is required at the requirements while reading the question for the first time.

Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)

Look for sculpture - whose strength is it? MM. But it is US art which is not allowed. Eliminate

Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.)

MM's strength is printmaking. It is related to Japan and 20th century. All requirements are met.

Select for  MM

Semirepresentational painting by Paul Cézanne (male, France, 19th c.)

19th century painting is not a strength of FA.

Semiabstract, semirepresentational art nouveau jewelry by René Lalique (male, France, 20th c.)

20th-century jewelry is a strength of FA. Semi-abstract or semirepresentational requirement is met. 
Art by US woman is a preference not a requirement.
 
Select for  FA

amkabdul · Answer

Well here goes the reasoning...The condition is MM needs to have an abstract or else atleast a semi representational art work (from a US female) ; while MM needs a 20th Century artwork from an artist who doesnt belong to US or Europe (It includes France as per world map:) )

So Out of all the 5

1 <-- Apt for FA

2 <-- Apt for MM

Other options all violate the conditions...

Hope you understand
(Do Kudo)

crazypriya · Answer

Good one....
I also initially chose FA and MM but then realised that 1st option cannot be FA as it is sculpture and 'the FA's strengths are 20th century US painting, 20th century jewelry, and art from 14th century South America. ' Moreover option 3 and option 5 are also not possible for FA as both are non-US painting. Hope this helps.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

For a work to meet MM’s requirements to be included in future exhibits, it must be a work of East Asian printmaking, a 19th-century European painting, or an 18th-century US painting or sculpture. However, the next exhibit must be devoted to something other than European or US art. This leaves only East Asian printmaking. The work by Hashiguchi Goyo is the only work that meets this requirement.

The correct answer is Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.).

For a work to meet FA’s requirements to be included in future exhibits, it must be a work of 20th-century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, or 14th-century South American art. The next exhibit is to be devoted to art that is abstract, semiabstract, or semirepresentational. The works by Louise Nevelson, Paul Cézanne, René Lalique, and Yuan Chin-Taa each meet the criteria for the exhibit. However, only the jewelry by René Lalique fits in with the strengths of FA.

The correct answer is Semiabstract, semirepresentational art nouveau jewelry by René Lalique (male, France, 20th c.).

thinhle · Answer

Hi  Sajjad1994  . Why "Semirepresentational painting by Yuan Chin-Taa (male, Taiwan, 20th c.)" is not a possible case for MM?

BLTN · Answer

\sqrt{

Dear  thinhle

You are right; I have stuck on this answer too.

Dear  Sajjad1994

Fix please.

Prompt:
....MM's strengths are East Asian   painting  , 19th century European maintaining, and the 18th century US painting and sculpture; & other than European or US art.

Pursuant to the constraints there are two plausible contenders:
- Representational woodblock  prints  by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.)
- Semirepresentational  painting  by Yuan Chin-Taa (male, Taiwan, 20th c.)

Yet, it cannot be the case because official explanation quoted:
 For a work to meet MM’s requirements to be included in future exhibits, it must be a work of East Asian   printmaking  , a 19th-century European painting }

BLTN · Answer

HarshavardhanR · Answer

https://gmatclub.com/forum/download/file.php?id=82312 ___ Harsha GMAT-Club-Forum-mtky6npj.png

faadbanda · Answer

Asked ChatGPT for a solution to this problem, as I couldn't understand why " Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)"  wasn't a perfect fit for  FA . Here's the analysis it gave. I don't understand how the GMAT logic works.

ChatGPT:
 
To solve this, we must match artworks to each museum (MM and FA)  without violating their exhibit requirements .

Requirements Recap  :

MM (Museo Metropolitano):

Strengths:

East Asian printmaking 
 19th-century European art 
 18th-century US painting/sculpture  
 
  Next exhibit must be:

Non-European  
  Non-US  
 From  20th century

FA (Fundación Arte):

Strengths:

20th-century US painting 
 20th-century jewelry 
 Art from 14th-century South America  
 
  Next exhibit must be:

Abstract  or  semirepresentational  
  Preferably US women artists

Option Analysis  :

Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)

Abstract ✅ 
 US ✅ 
 Female ✅ 
 20th century ✅ 
 ✅  Fits FA’s theme perfectly   
 
  Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.)

East Asian ✅ 
 Printmaking ✅ 
 20th century ✅ 
 Non-European/US ✅ 
 ✅  Fits MM’s requirement perfectly   
 
  Semirepresentational painting by Paul Cézanne (male, France, 19th c.)

European ❌ (Not allowed at MM) 
 19th century ❌ (Not allowed at either for current exhibit) 
 ❌  Invalid for both   
 
  Semiabstract, semirepresentational art nouveau jewelry by René Lalique (male, France, 20th c.)

Abstract/semi ✅ 
 Jewelry ✅ (FA strength) 
 France ❌ (Not US or South American woman) 
 Possible, but  not preferred  over Louise Nevelson for FA 
 ⚠️ Less ideal for FA  
 
  Semirepresentational painting by Yuan Chin-Taa (male, Taiwan, 20th c.)

East Asian ✅ 
 20th century ✅ 
 Not fully abstract ✅ 
 ✅ Acceptable for  MM  
 ❌ Doesn’t fit FA’s US women artist preference

✅  
 Correct Answer Selections  :

MM: 
✅  Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (Japan, 20th c.)  
  FA: 
✅  Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)

Let me know if you’d like a breakdown grid or printable summary.

HarshavardhanR · Answer

Hey!

I actively use ChatGPT and Claude to help create questions suiting my requirements.

Take it from me -> The LLMs are not  yet  perfect in their reasoning abilities. In other words, don't assume chatGPT is correct. As of now, there are enough instances of incorrect reasoning to be wary.

I have seen LLMs do RC pretty well, and most if not all CR. With some of the DI question types, and some logic-over-math type quant questions, I still think there is a distance to cover.

Coming to this question  ->

(1) "  As part of a joint process two museums - Museo Metropolitano (MM) and the Fundacion Arte (FA)-    have decided to require that    exhibits at each museum be directly connected to the strengths of their permanent collections."

Observe the bolded portion. This means that it is  compulsory  that the exhibits be connected to FA (and MM's) strengths.

(2)  FA's strengths  ->  "the FA's strengths are 20th century US painting, 20th-century jewelry, and art from 14th-century South America."

It is absolutely compulsory that whatever is chosen be either

- 20C US painting or
- 20C jewelry or
- 14C South American Art
  
Choice  -> Large abstract  sculpture  by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.). 
 
This is

- Not a 20C US Painting (it is a sculpture, not a painting)
- Not 20C jewelry (it is a sculpture, not jewelry)
- Not 14C South American art (not 20C, not South American)

In essence, we are given that the exhibit must be connected to FA's strengths. 20C US sculpture is not connected to any of the above strengths.

Hope this helps.

---
Harsha

Gladiator59 · Answer

edit the question to fix the spelling  Bunuel   bb

Bunuel · Answer

Done. Let me know if I missed anything. Thank you!

As part of a joint process two museums - Museo metropolitano (MM) and

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

MM	FA	Statements
		Large abstract sculpture by Louise Nevelson (female, US, 20th c.)
		Representational woodblock prints by Hashiguchi Goyo (male, Japan, 20th c.)
		Semirepresentational painting by Paul Cézanne (male, France, 19th c.)
		Semiabstract, semirepresentational art nouveau jewelry by René Lalique (male, France, 20th c.)
		Semirepresentational painting by Yuan Chin-Taa (male, Taiwan, 20th c.)

GMAT Two-part Analysis (TPA) Questions

As part of a joint process two museums - Museo metropolitano (MM) and

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards