Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Sep 2014, 01:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Housing law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and renting a luxurious apartment that is used for business purposes. Thus, many Canadian companies themselves purchase luxurious apartments. The vast majority of the business housing colonies are owned by small and mid-size businesses, and accommodations are strictly for business purposes, with mostly mid-level employees on board. These companies and their boards of directors are in full compliance with the law and with what is best for their businesses.
Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?
A. The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money.
B. Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments.
C. Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments.
D. Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.
E. By not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are complying with the law.
Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?
A. The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money.
B. Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments.
C. Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments.
D. Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.
E. By not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are complying with the law.
16 Sep 2014, 01:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
The Housing law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and renting a luxurious apartment that is used for business purposes. Thus, many Canadian companies themselves purchase luxurious apartments. The vast majority of the business housing colonies are owned by small and mid-size businesses, and accommodations are strictly for business purposes, with mostly mid-level employees on board. These companies and their boards of directors are in full compliance with the law and with what is best for their businesses.
Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?
A. The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money.
B. Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments.
C. Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments.
D. Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.
E. By not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are complying with the law.
General Approach: The first step to answering inference based questions is to fully understand the information provided in the given statements. The statements should be analysed to identify and understand the main elements and how they relate to each other.
The second step is to evaluate each answer choice by confirming whether it follows logically from the given information. The correct answer choice must be entirely supported by the information in the given statements.
Correct Answer: Answer E: It is mentioned in the passage that the companies are in compliance with the law which prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and renting a luxurious apartment that is used for business purposes. Therefore, it can be concluded that by not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are also complying with the law. This is the only inference which can be derived directly and logically from the information provided in the passage.
Incorrect Answers: Answer A: The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money. This cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no explicit information given about the costs associated with the implementation of the law.
Answer B: Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments. This choice cannot be inferred from the passage as it does not provide any information on the preferences of the executives.
Answer C: Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments. This cannot be inferred from the passage as it does not discuss the housing arrangements made by large businesses.
Answer D: Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law. This cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no information given about the housing arrangements made by upper level executives.
Answer: E
The Housing law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and renting a luxurious apartment that is used for business purposes. Thus, many Canadian companies themselves purchase luxurious apartments. The vast majority of the business housing colonies are owned by small and mid-size businesses, and accommodations are strictly for business purposes, with mostly mid-level employees on board. These companies and their boards of directors are in full compliance with the law and with what is best for their businesses.
Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the statements above?
A. The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money.
B. Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments.
C. Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments.
D. Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law.
E. By not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are complying with the law.
General Approach: The first step to answering inference based questions is to fully understand the information provided in the given statements. The statements should be analysed to identify and understand the main elements and how they relate to each other.
The second step is to evaluate each answer choice by confirming whether it follows logically from the given information. The correct answer choice must be entirely supported by the information in the given statements.
Correct Answer: Answer E: It is mentioned in the passage that the companies are in compliance with the law which prohibits businesses from reimbursing any employees for the cost of owning and renting a luxurious apartment that is used for business purposes. Therefore, it can be concluded that by not receiving any reimbursement for these luxurious apartments, the mid-level executives on board are also complying with the law. This is the only inference which can be derived directly and logically from the information provided in the passage.
Incorrect Answers: Answer A: The Housing law of 1989 in question costs businesses money. This cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no explicit information given about the costs associated with the implementation of the law.
Answer B: Most executives would rather use company owned luxurious apartments than use commercial luxury apartments. This choice cannot be inferred from the passage as it does not provide any information on the preferences of the executives.
Answer C: Large businesses usually have their executives stay in semi-luxurious or ordinary commercial apartments. This cannot be inferred from the passage as it does not discuss the housing arrangements made by large businesses.
Answer D: Upper level executives are less often in compliance with the law. This cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no information given about the housing arrangements made by upper level executives.
Answer: E
30 Mar 2018, 10:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
I am confused with the question language and official explanation. Can somebody provide a better explanation?
