Hi AnushkaKala,This is a great question, and it's exactly the confusion Rogerper123 and Annukiran raised in the thread when they tried a geometric-progression setup (
1050·a^5 = 1550·b^5). Rahul885 pointed to the fix, and it's worth spelling out as a general rule you can reuse.
The single strongest clue: the unitsLook at what the rate is measured in.
-
A rate given as an absolute amount per time - "members
per year," "dollars per month," "liters per hour" - means you
add the same fixed number each period. That's
linear (arithmetic) growth.
-
A rate given as a percent - "grows
5% per year," "increases by a
factor of
1.1," "doubles every decade" - means you
multiply each period. That's
exponential (geometric) growth.
In this question the table literally says
"Rate of increase (members per year)". That unit - a count of members added each year - locks it as linear. So each year Org A adds the same fixed number, and after
5 years it has
1050 + 5a. No compounding.
Why "constant rate" felt ambiguousThe phrase "constant rate of increase"
sounds like it could go either way, and that's the trap. The word "rate" alone doesn't decide it -
the units do. Percentages compound; fixed quantities add.
A quick test to build the habitRead these two versions of the same sentence and sort each one:
- "Membership grows by
40 members each year." - add
40 every year -
linear.
- "Membership grows by
4% each year." - multiply by
1.04 every year -
exponential.
Same word ("grows"), different unit, different model. Whenever you're unsure, ask:
am I told a number to add, or a percent to multiply by? That question alone will settle it almost every time.
Answer: Column 1 (Organization A) = 130; Column 2 (Organization B) = 30AnushkaKala
I generally struggle with understanding if a question is on linear growth or exponential growth. how do we identify it in such questions?