Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 10:06 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 10:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kinjiGC
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 789
Own Kudos:
2,736
 [19]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 789
Kudos: 2,736
 [19]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
kinjiGC
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 789
Own Kudos:
2,736
 [6]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 789
Kudos: 2,736
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,776
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,776
Kudos: 1,507
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dream21
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Last visit: 16 Jan 2019
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
52
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 45
Kudos: 52
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I dont understand when the argument says "Oppose the Tax".
If the argument said that the plan will not work then Option E would have fitted the bill perfectly.
In case of Oppose the Tax I thought the plan would have resulted into something that would worsen the scenario.
Confused!!!!!
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,776
Own Kudos:
1,507
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,776
Kudos: 1,507
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"I dont understand when the argument says "Oppose the Tax".
If the argument said that the plan will not work then Option E would have fitted the bill perfectly.
In case of Oppose the Tax I thought the plan would have resulted into something that would worsen the scenario.
Confused!!!!!"

The paradox is, if the tax is intended to reduce bag use, why would environmentalists opposite it. The main concern of the environmentalists is reducing bag use. If the tax does not reduce bag use, the environmentalists have no reason to support it and may, in fact, oppose it.
avatar
priya sri
Joined: 15 Oct 2016
Last visit: 28 Nov 2018
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paper and plastic grocery bags are a continuing problem for the city, both as litter and in landfills. To discourage their use, the city council has proposed a tax on each bag, to be paid by the supermarkets that supply them. Several environmental groups, however, oppose the tax, despite having brought the issue to the council’s attention in the first place.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the environmental groups’ opposition to the proposed tax?

(A) The city’s current tax revenue is insufficient to pay the cost of recycling paper and plastic grocery bags.

(B) The cost to the city of collecting and disposing of a grocery bag is greater than the proposed tax per bag.

(C) Plastic bags account for 90 percent of the grocery bags that litter the city’s streets and take up space in landfills.

(D) Only supermarkets distributing more than a certain number of grocery bags each month would be subject to the proposed tax.

(E) Supermarkets plan to pass the tax on to consumers, who are unlikely to change their behavior based on the small increase in their grocery bills.



IN WEAKEN questions,,,,,,,,,,,strategy is -check for conclusion and gap.

COnclusion-Environmental groups oppose the plan.

gap-why environmental groups oppose ??
Prethinking
plan though implimented ,it wil not bring desired change.
In options,check for plan implimentation followed by no change in purchase of plastic bags

OR
plan implimentation takes more time and bythen situation becomes worst..
options

A-It is not the cost,,,its concern to stop usage of plastic bags ....out of scope
B-same as A
C-again curtailing usage of plastic papers,,so planned to keep a tax. Not because governemt do not have funds to recycle.
D-If only supermarkets gonna pay,,,,,,But how about normal stores etc etc,,,,,,,even then problem persists
E-it shows though 2-3 rs is charged on every bag,,,,,,,,it pass on to customers,,,,,,,,,,even after plan implimentation,,,no successful result as consumers behavior not likely to change.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts