One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild

Question

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild elephants directly at the Roman armies, trampling infantry and inducing disarray in the ranks, but Scipio's successful counterstrategy was  to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing  the elephants behind his ranks.

A) to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing
B) to command his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
C) commanding his men to part, creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
D) commanding that his men should part, creating channels to allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
E) commanding his men to part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing

daagh · Accepted Answer

A) to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing ---  Charging and to command are unparallel  
B) to command his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill ---  same as in A  
C) commanding his men to part, creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill ----  the correct answer  
D) commanding that his men should part, creating channels to allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill --  ‘commanding’ , a mandatory order cannot go with ‘should’ a recommendatory word  
E) commanding his men to part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing --- t hem is ambiguous; whether it is referring to the men or the channels; then an object cannot take on the role of a subject ( they)

soleimanian · Answer

A)  to command  that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through,  with them killing 
B)  to command  his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through,  and then to kill 
C)  commanding his men to part , creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through,  and then to kill 
D)  commanding that  his men should part, creating channels to allow the elephants simply to pass through,  and then to kill 
E)  commanding his men to part , creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through,  with them killing

A+B: infinitive (to command) is not parallel to "charging"
C: "Commanding to part" is parallel to "to kill" 
D: "Commanding that" is not parallel to "to kill"
E: "Commanding to part" is not parallel to "killing"

Therefore, the answer is C

maheshaero20 · Answer

A)  to command  that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing
B)  to command  his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
C) commanding his men  to part , creating channels allowing the elephants simply  to pass  through, and then  to kill 
D) commanding  that his men should part , creating channels to allow the elephants simply  to pass  through, and then  to kill 
E) commanding his men  to part , creating channels that allowed the elephants simply  to pass through , with  them killing

A and B are out because of parallelism (was charging:was commanding)

The word command needs subjunctive "to". So D is out
E is out for parallelism which is highlighted above

C is the correct answer

Kudos +1 if like it

dabhishek87 · Answer

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild elephants directly at the Roman armies, trampling infantry and inducing disarray in the ranks, but Scipio's successful counterstrategy was  to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing  the elephants behind his ranks.

A)  to command  that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with  them  killing  to command is not parallel 
B)  to command  his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill  same as A 
C) commanding his men to part, creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill  correct 
D)  commanding  that his men  should  part, creating channels to allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill  command and should can not go together 
E) commanding his men to part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with  them  killing

arvind910619 · Answer

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild elephants directly at the Roman armies, trampling infantry and inducing disarray in the ranks, but Scipio's successful counterstrategy was to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing the elephants behind his ranks.

A) to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing
B) to command his men in parting, creating channels that allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
 C)  commanding his men to part, creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill  
D) commanding that his men should part, creating channels to allow the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill
E) commanding his men to part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing

Imo C it has all the parallel elements .

Option A has multiple errors them is ambiguous.Charging and to command are not parallel.
Option B again has the same error  to command   
Option D Should can not be used in a sentence which has commanding verb.
Option E has  them  which is ambiguous.

aragonn · Answer

Official Explanation 
This one is tricky because it involves parallelism at a couple different levels. First of all, we are comparing Hannibal's vs. Scipio's approach. Hannibal's technique was "charging", so we suspect Scipio's counterstrategy would be parallel to this: "commanding", not "to command." This makes us suspicious of (A) & (B). If there were no parallelism to consider, the use of the infinitive in this context would be a perfectly correct construction.

After the word command/commanding, the most natural idiom is an infinitive:to command B to do X. The "that"-clause structure here, "that his men should part", is very awkward, and does not fit. Because of this, we reject (A) & (D).

The structure "with them killing" is 100% wrong. In general, the GMAT hates "with" +   +   to encapsulate action. If we want to talk about action, we need to use a full bona fide verb. This structure appears in both (A).

We know that Scipio is commanding his men to do something: what is he commanding them to do? He is commanding two things: (a) to part, and (b) to kill the elephants. These two actions need to be in parallel as well. Furthermore, the correction idiom is "command" +  , while the construction "command" +   is 100% wrong. Choice (C) correctly has two infinitives, "to part" and "to kill". Choice (C) is the only answer that has correct parallelism on both levels, so this is the only possible answer. (C) is correct.

Both (D) and (E) lose the important distinction between the two things that Scipio commanded: to part and to kill. Instead, (D) and (E) both create a list of participles and in doing so Scipio is commanding only that his men part, a major change in meaning. Remember, parallelism is not automatically correct especially when it entails a major change in meaning.

Youraisemeup · Answer

daagh  sir, need guidance:
With regards to Option C, isn't to kill an infinitive which is paired with participles... are such elements even parallel?

Regards

daagh · Answer

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild elephants directly at the Roman armies, trampling infantry and inducing disarray in the ranks, but Scipio's successful counterstrategy was to command that his men should part, creating channels that allowed the elephants simply to pass through, with them killing the elephants behind his ranks.

C. commanding his men to part, creating channels allowing the elephants simply to pass through, and then to kill

Youraise
Hi,

'creating channels that allowed … ' is a modifier of the previous clause namely, "Scipio's strategy was commanding his men to part" 
The modifier is not an essential item of the core of the sentence and hence does not compete with 'to kill' "To part and to kill are the chief elements of Scipio's strategy and they only required to be parallel and not the modifier's parts. 
Yes, it is indeed a tricky thing to decide which need to be parallel and which need not.

sid0791 · Answer

egmat   daagh

Please check my approach, let me know if I am wrong.

I didn't check for parallelism (although I should have)

1st check- "creating channels that allowed", here, "that" modifies "channels", now if we go literally with the meaning-based approach, channels don't allow(give permission) themselves for anything.

therefore- A,B,E is wrong.

In C and D
2nd check- "commanding" modifies "Scipio's successful counterstrategy", also "that" again modifies "Scipio's successful counterstrategy". There was really no need to use both commanding and that. So on this basis, I eliminated D.

Although I did it correctly, just wanted to know whether this approach is fine or not?
Also after reading the comments, I checked for parallelism, and I have one doubt about it. In C "to part" and "to kill" is parallel but wouldn't "then" before "to kill" would create an issue?

+1 Kudos if my approach is correct for this question

penco · Answer

Isn't command a subjunctive verb ?
In what cases it can work with infinitive as well?

egmat

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

One of Hannibal's successful battle techniques was charging wild

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards