bizshraddha
I don’t quite agree with the solution. The question says, no. of hours spent studying varies directly with the likelihood of passing the exam. Option 3, however, emphasises work experience, which is not mentioned at all in the question. Work experience is different from studying. So option 4 should be correct, as taking a course equates to studying.
You’re bringing up a good question about scope. A lot of the critical reasoning questions are proven correct or incorrect by going outside of the scope of the argument for example conclusion questions or assumption questions are good examples.
Strengthen and weaken questions however often introduce additional evidence which will therefore strengthen or weaken the argument by either clarifying or adding.
In this case it’s a very weak and soft strengthener especially who tells us that all the electricians had the same amount of work experience and therefore it was an even comparison and you didn’t have somebody with one year and somebody was 15 years of experience.
Answer choice D introduces a course. There are a few gaps in the answer choice. We don’t know when it was completed. We also didn’t know how long it was. And we know that this course overlaps with the certification in a few areas but it doesn’t appear to be a part of the exam preparation curriculum.
This resulted the situation such as one of the course was taken five years ago and it was only a two hour course. In this case it’s completely useless and this is just a coincidence
On the other hand, if this course was done right before the exam and it was a 400 hour course, maybe these people who passed the exam didn’t pass it because they studied for the exam but because they took the course. They did not take this course to study for the exam which is the eventual issue with answer choice D)