Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 14:26 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 14:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
manhattan187
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Last visit: 06 Jan 2016
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
227
 [26]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 17
Kudos: 227
 [26]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VeritasPrepDennis
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 08 Jul 2022
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
189
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
GPA: 3.62
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 108
Kudos: 189
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
onamarif
Joined: 03 Feb 2017
Last visit: 25 Sep 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 20
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kkrrsshh
Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2020
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 40
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why cant we use the two statements together and solve for x(x being distance suppose). Even if we are not assuming "average speed that was 50% greater is equal to 10 miles ", we can create two equations separately for each statement and solve them for distance.
From first statement, x/a=x/(a+10) +5 ...
From second statement, x/1.5a=x/a - 1/3..

x=distance
a=average speed
Can anyone throw more light on this? What am I doing wrong here?
avatar
PMZ21
Joined: 25 Apr 2017
Last visit: 24 Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 136
Posts: 12
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Could someone please explain why Option 'C' isn't possible?

Since, we have two variables and have two equations (1 from each statement). We can use these two equations to solve for the variable values:

Statement 1 gives us:
Actual scenario: x (avg speed), y - time and xy - distance
==>(x+10) * (y-5) = xy
==> xy = xy+10y - 5x - 50
==> 5x + 50 = 10y
==> x = 2y - 10

Statement 2:
1.5x * (y-1/3) = xy
==> 5xy = 3y-1 ---- substitution x in terms of y

Shouldn't the two options be sufficient to solve? Experts! please help!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PMZ21
Hi,

Could someone please explain why Option 'C' isn't possible?

Since, we have two variables and have two equations (1 from each statement). We can use these two equations to solve for the variable values:

Statement 1 gives us:
Actual scenario: x (avg speed), y - time and xy - distance
==>(x+10) * (y-5) = xy
==> xy = xy+10y - 5x - 50
==> 5x + 50 = 10y
==> x = 2y - 10

Statement 2:
1.5x * (y-1/3) = xy
==> 5xy = 3y-1 ---- substitution x in terms of y

Shouldn't the two options be sufficient to solve? Experts! please help!

Have you read this: https://gmatclub.com/forum/what-is-the- ... l#p1593590
avatar
PMZ21
Joined: 25 Apr 2017
Last visit: 24 Jul 2017
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 136
Posts: 12
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yup, I did. I was still confused about the reasoning.

Thanks anyway!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
utkarshthapak
Joined: 09 Dec 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2018
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
51
 [3]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.5
WE:Engineering (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
Schools: IIMC  (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 93
Kudos: 51
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question, below is my method (taking initial average speed as 's', initial time as 't' and distance as 'd' which is constant)

Statement 1: When s changes to s+10, t changes to t-5. No we know, initially for steve, d=s*t. with the given info, it will be, d=(s+10)*(t-5). so, s*t = s*t+10t-5s-50 => 2t-s=10. Two variables, one equation. Insufficient.

Statement 2: When s changes to (s+1/2s) and t changes to (t-1/3t). Again the initial equation for distance is, d=s*t. with given info it becomes, d=(s+1/2s)*(t-1/3t) => s*t = 3/2s*2/3t => 1=1. This gives us nothing but tells us that the relation between s and t is, s increased by 50% results in time reduced by 1/3 ans s and t can be anything which satisfies this relation. Insufficient.

If you combine both statement then also you have two variables and one equation. Insufficient.

So answer will be E.

Let me know if I am making any mistakes :)
User avatar
gmatzpractice
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Last visit: 25 Nov 2024
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 122
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1:
(r+10)(t-5)=rt
There's not enough info to find distance= rate * time
Insufficient

Statement 2:
(1.5r)(2/3t)=rt
This information is redundant as it results in 1=1
Insufficient

Answer E
avatar
ayush93
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 20 Jul 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q49 V17
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.2
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
utkarshthapak
Good question, below is my method (taking initial average speed as 's', initial time as 't' and distance as 'd' which is constant)

Statement 1: When s changes to s+10, t changes to t-5. No we know, initially for steve, d=s*t. with the given info, it will be, d=(s+10)*(t-5). so, s*t = s*t+10t-5s-50 => 2t-s=10. Two variables, one equation. Insufficient.

Statement 2: When s changes to (s+1/2s) and t changes to (t-1/3t). Again the initial equation for distance is, d=s*t. with given info it becomes, d=(s+1/2s)*(t-1/3t) => s*t = 3/2s*2/3t => 1=1. This gives us nothing but tells us that the relation between s and t is, s increased by 50% results in time reduced by 1/3 ans s and t can be anything which satisfies this relation. Insufficient.

If you combine both statement then also you have two variables and one equation. Insufficient.

So answer will be E.

Let me know if I am making any mistakes :)

if we combine both:
In Statement 1 , we are give (s+10)(t-5)=d
In statement 2, we are given (s+1/2s)(t-1/3t)=d

so we can compare values,
1/2s=10 => s=20
1/3t=5 =>t=15
distance d= 20*15 =300

So the answer should be C.

Please tell me if there is any error.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,955
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,955
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109728 posts
498 posts
211 posts