Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 14:06 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 14:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Jeoren
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Last visit: 01 Jul 2017
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
137
 [79]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 137
 [79]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
70
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
souvonik2k
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Nov 2015
Last visit: 05 Dec 2021
Posts: 949
Own Kudos:
2,248
 [69]
Given Kudos: 751
Status:Preparing for GMAT
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Products:
Posts: 949
Kudos: 2,248
 [69]
59
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
jyotsnamahajan
Joined: 16 Mar 2014
Last visit: 16 Sep 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
6
 [3]
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Rishika1792
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jyotsnamahajan
Is there a better way to solve the second statement? Using numbers as examples takes time and leaves rool for making error

For Statement 1, solving for r+s, r-s, rs and r/s clearly indicates r+s as the largest number.

For Statement 2, lets assume the following cases.

Case 1: r is +ve, and s is +ve
=> r+s and r*s is definitely bigger than r-s
=> but its hard to discern which one will be the largest.
=>Please note, you can only take cases where r-s is < than r/s because r/s may or may not be bigger than r-s
eg: if r=4 and s=1, r-s<r/s; but if r=6 and s=2, r-s>r/s

Case 2: r is +ve and s is -ve
=> r-s will always be greater than r+s
=> since this case does not satisfy the condition in Statement 2 (r-s is the least number), we can disregard this case.

Case 3: r is -ve and s is -ve
=> Here too r+s will always be greater than r-s
=> since this case does not satisfy the condition in Statement 2 (r-s is the least number), we can disregard this case.

Case 4: r is -ve and s is +ve
=> analysing the r+s, r-s, rs and r/s no particular pattern is discernible.
=> so we can choose numbers to find cases where r-s is the least but there are different answers for the max

All in all, after looking at the cases, Case 2 and Case 3 can be disregarded and Case 1 and Case 4 does not give you a constant maximum.
During the test, If you start with Case 1, given that case 1 does not give you a number which will always be maximum, you can strike Statement 2 as insufficient
avatar
Tonkotsu
Joined: 10 Oct 2020
Last visit: 31 Mar 2023
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: United States (TN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GPA: 3.74
WE:Analyst (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 43
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Of the numbers r + s, r - s, r*s, and r/s, which is greatest?

(1) r = s =1

We know the values of r and s, so sufficient.

(2) r - s is the least of the numbers

just because r-s is the least, doesn't indicate to us whether r or s is negative or positive either, so r*s and r/s could have varying results. insufficient.
User avatar
hdixit
Joined: 25 Jul 2023
Last visit: 15 Oct 2023
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 165
Location: India
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB


Hi Karishma,

At the first glance of such question how can I solve the above mentioned question through reasoning or number line rather taking different values.

Thanks,
Himanshu
User avatar
TheDG
Joined: 11 Jun 2023
Last visit: 16 Apr 2024
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 6
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Chipping in with my 2 cents.

Statement 1: Straight forward so no sense of adding aditional information.

Statement 2: Since it is stated that "r - s is the least of the numbers" we can set up the following equation --> r + s > r - s. From here we need to consider that S > 0.
Now we can test cases (but with the restriction that S is positive. No other solutuon mentions this restriction).
    R = 10, S = 1 --> r+s is greatest
    R = 10, S = 3 --> r*s is greatest
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,954
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,954
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109729 posts
498 posts
211 posts