Even though I have selected the corect answer in both OG13 and in the altered version, I don't understand , why did you change the answer choices. Official questions are best structured, and I don't see any reason to alter them.
We need here some connection between decreasing number of alligators and freshwater fishes + the fact that alligators prey heavily on that type of fishes. This is a Resolve the Paradox Question - so we don't have a conclusion here. In this type of questions both sides are factually correct and we need to explain how the situation came into being or add a piece of Information showing how the two parts can coexist (see CR Bible). To resolve the paradox we must adress ALL the facts -> decreasing number of alligators and fish species + the annual number of fishes caught for human consumption has not increased.
A. The decline in the alligator population has meant that fishers can work in some parts of lakes and rivers that were formerly too dangerous.
-> in the argument is clearly stated, the number of fishes for human consumption doesn't changeB. Over the last few years, Parland’s commercial fishing enterprises have increased the number of fishing boats they use. -> in the argument is clearly stated, the number of fishes for human consumption doesn't change
C. Many Parlanders who hunt alligators do so because of the high market price of alligator skins, not because of the threat alligators pose to the fish population.
-> it's out of scope and btw. doesn't explain the decreasing number of fish speciesD. During Parland’s dry season, holes dug by alligators remain filled with water long enough to provide a safe place for the eggs of this fish species to hatch.
-> CORRECT. #of Alligators decreases -> #of the holes decreases -> fewer safe places for the eggs to hatch -> fewer fish species.E. In several neighboring countries through which Parland’s rivers also flow, alligators are at risk of extinction as a result of extensive hunting.
-> It doesn't explain the decreasing number of fish speciesOG 13 Answers:
A. The decline in the alligator population has meant that fishers can work in some parts of lakes and rivers that were formerly too dangerous
-> in the argument is clearly stated, the number of fishes for human consumption doesn't changeB. Over the last few years, Parland’s commercial fishing enterprises have increased the number of fishing boats they use -> in the argument is clearly stated, the number of fishes for human consumption doesn't change
C. The main predator of these fish is another species of fish on which alligators also prey
--> CORRECT. #Alligators goes down --> #main Predator fish type goes up --> #freshwater fish species goes down.D. Many Parlanders who hunt alligators do so because of the high market price of alligator skins, not because of the threat alligators pose to the fish population
-> it's out of scope and btw. doesn't explain the decreasing number of fish speciesE. In several neighboring countries through which Parland’s rivers also flow, alligators are at risk of extinction as a result of extensive hunting
-> It doesn't explain the decreasing number of fish species