Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet’s mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of which Halley’s comet is composed reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than had been previously thought.
The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one of the following?This is a Conclusion question, and the correct answer will logically follow from something said by the passage.
(A) Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of which Halley’s comet is composed.The passage says nothing that supports this choice.
In fact, the fact that the material of which Halley's comet is composed does not reflect that much light indicates that it's possible that no comet is composed of material that reflects that much light.
Eliminate.
(B) Previous estimates of the mass of Halley’s comet which were based on its brightness were too low.This choice is logically supported by the passage. Here's how.
Scientists estimated the mass of Halley's comet using the amount of light reflected by the comet. To do so, they measured the amount of light reflected and divided that by the estimated amount of light reflected per unit of mass to get the mass.
So, they used the following:
Light/Light Reflected Per Unit of Mass = Mass
The passage indicates that they had overestimated Light Reflected Per Unit of Mass.
So, we can see that, since Light Reflected Per Unit of Mass is the denominator, overestimating Light Reflected Per Unit of Mass would result in an underestimation of Mass.
Keep.
(C) The total amount of light reflected from Halley’s comet is less than scientists had previously thought.This is a trap choice.
The point of the passage is that the material of which Halley's comet is composed is not as reflective as scientists had thought.
That doesn't mean that they had overestimated the total amount of light reflected by the comet. It makes sense that scientists can observe from a distance how much light is reflected in total.
What's apparently difficult is knowing how reflective the comet is.
For example, a large comet that is not very reflective will reflect the same total amount of light as a more reflective, smaller comet does. So, from a distance, it could be difficult to tell which Halley's comet is, a not very reflective, large comet or a smaller, more reflective comet.
So, what the passage indicates is that scientists can get the reflectivity, and thus the size, of a comet wrong, not that they got the total amount of light reflected by Halley's comet wrong.
Eliminate.
(D) The reflective properties of the material of which comets are composed vary considerably from comet to comet.This is plausible, but the passage does not say anything that supports it.
Eliminate.
(E) Scientists need more information before they can make a good estimate of the mass of Halley’s comet.In a way, this contradicts what the passage says.
After all, if the information provided by the satellite probe is accurate, then scientist may now have information sufficient for making a good estimate of the mass of Halley's comet.
In any case, the passage does not say anything that clearly indicates that scientist need more information to make a good estimate. It indicates only that a previous estimate was incorrect.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: B