Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 02:09 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 02:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
6,577
 [12]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,577
 [12]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Iamnowjust
Joined: 26 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2021
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 10
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DharLog
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
345
 [1]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Posts: 312
Kudos: 345
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 17 Aug 2026
Posts: 689
Own Kudos:
193
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,706
Location: India
Posts: 689
Kudos: 193
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A is wrong because the author specifically talks about Piano as a musical instrument. "Musical instruments" in A is a broad term and can't be a conclusion for the argument.
User avatar
Rishab2409
Joined: 11 May 2026
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 136
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 152
Posts: 136
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To find the main conclusion of the musicologist's argument, let's break down the structure of the passage:

Premise 1: Classification of a musical instrument depends on the mechanical action through which it produces music.

Premise 2: Even though a piano has strings, those strings are vibrated by the impact of hammers.

Conclusion: Therefore, the piano is properly called a percussion instrument, not a stringed instrument.

The author uses the general rule (Premise 1) to argue a specific point: how a piano specifically should be classified. The main takeaway—the point the author is trying to prove—is that the piano belongs in the percussion category.

Let's look at the options:

(A) is a premise, not the conclusion. This restates the first sentence, which is the foundational rule the musicologist uses to support their final point.
(B) is outside the scope. The passage doesn't discuss how musicians interact with the instruments.
(C) is a counter-premise. This background info explains why some people might get confused, but it isn't what the author is trying to prove.
(D) is the opposite of the argument. The author is saying the piano is not a stringed instrument.

(E) perfectly matches. This accurately captures the final point of the argument: that the piano is properly (correctly) called a percussion instrument.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts