Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Aug 2018, 04:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
65% (01:27) correct
35%
(01:33)
wrong
based on 657
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Nations that have little interaction with one another have little knowledge of one another's needs and problems. Because both sympathy and justice depend largely on understanding the needs and problems of others, it follows that - - -
Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?
.(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice
.(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another
.(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice
.(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations
.(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems
Source: LSAT
Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?
.(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice
.(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another
.(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice
.(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations
.(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems
Source: LSAT
18 Aug 2018, 06:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
I chose B on the basis of POE.
.(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice - the word 'will' is too extreme
.(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another - this inference can be made from the argument, and the tone of the language is similar to that of the argument
.(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice - the word 'almost all' is too extreme and also problems between nations are irrelevant
.(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations - elimination of conflict is irrelevant and it cannot be inferred
.(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems - again, the word 'only' makes the answer very extreme and nowhere in the argument is the tone extreme
Source: LSAT[/quote]
.(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice - the word 'will' is too extreme
.(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another - this inference can be made from the argument, and the tone of the language is similar to that of the argument
.(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice - the word 'almost all' is too extreme and also problems between nations are irrelevant
.(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations - elimination of conflict is irrelevant and it cannot be inferred
.(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems - again, the word 'only' makes the answer very extreme and nowhere in the argument is the tone extreme
Source: LSAT[/quote]
02 Sep 2024, 22:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
Argument Breakdown:
Premise 1: Nations that have little interaction with one another have little knowledge of one another's needs and problems.
Premise 2: Sympathy and justice depend largely on understanding the needs and problems of others.
Conclusion: The conclusion should logically follow from the premises.
We can say that if nations have little interaction, they lack knowledge of each other's needs and problems.
Since sympathy and justice depend on understanding these needs and problems, the absence of interaction would lead to difficulties in extending sympathy and justice.
(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice
This option implies that knowledge will definitely lead to sympathy and justice. However, the passage only states that sympathy and justice depend largely on understanding, not that they will definitely occur. This is a stronger conclusion than the argument supports.
(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another
This is consistent with the argument. If interaction is necessary for understanding, and understanding is necessary for sympathy and justice, then lack of interaction would indeed make it difficult for nations to extend sympathy and justice.
(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice
This choice is too broad. The argument does not claim that most problems stem from a lack of sympathy and justice.
(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations
This is irrelevant to the argument. The argument does not address the elimination of conflict, only the relationship between interaction, knowledge, and the extension of sympathy and justice.
(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems
This restates a premise rather than logically completing the argument. It's a necessary part of the argument but doesn't complete the logical progression.
The most logical completion of the argument is (B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another. This option directly follows from the premises given and correctly concludes the argument.
Premise 1: Nations that have little interaction with one another have little knowledge of one another's needs and problems.
Premise 2: Sympathy and justice depend largely on understanding the needs and problems of others.
Conclusion: The conclusion should logically follow from the premises.
We can say that if nations have little interaction, they lack knowledge of each other's needs and problems.
Since sympathy and justice depend on understanding these needs and problems, the absence of interaction would lead to difficulties in extending sympathy and justice.
(A) nations that have knowledge of one another's needs and problems will treat each other with sympathy and justice
This option implies that knowledge will definitely lead to sympathy and justice. However, the passage only states that sympathy and justice depend largely on understanding, not that they will definitely occur. This is a stronger conclusion than the argument supports.
(B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another
This is consistent with the argument. If interaction is necessary for understanding, and understanding is necessary for sympathy and justice, then lack of interaction would indeed make it difficult for nations to extend sympathy and justice.
(C) almost all problems between nations stem from lack of sympathy and justice
This choice is too broad. The argument does not claim that most problems stem from a lack of sympathy and justice.
(D) there is no way to eliminate conflict among nations
This is irrelevant to the argument. The argument does not address the elimination of conflict, only the relationship between interaction, knowledge, and the extension of sympathy and justice.
(E) only nations that have some interaction with one another have knowledge of one another's needs and problems
This restates a premise rather than logically completing the argument. It's a necessary part of the argument but doesn't complete the logical progression.
The most logical completion of the argument is (B) without some interaction, nations are bound to find it difficult to extend sympathy and justice to one another. This option directly follows from the premises given and correctly concludes the argument.
