Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Oct 0107:00 AM BST
-08:00 AM GMT
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
16 Dec 2018, 12:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
A test taker made 9 mistakes ..V41? 5 mistakes in the first two sections?
Another confusion ：
Very recent scores
700（Q50，V35）；
710（Q50，V34）；
the overall score for the first time is 10 points lower than for the second time
Why ?
Posted from my mobile device
Another confusion ：
Very recent scores
700（Q50，V35）；
710（Q50，V34）；
the overall score for the first time is 10 points lower than for the second time
Why ?
Posted from my mobile device
Attachments
CBC4EFEA-02C7-4C82-9D1A-3EBB93F8340E.jpeg [ 596.43 KiB | Viewed 3660 times ]
D6A8B486-ADC4-4A34-996A-028BA8D36834.jpeg [ 596.43 KiB | Viewed 3683 times ]
16 Dec 2018, 19:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
Keep in mind that the difficulty of the questions that you get right/wrong impact your score, too. You got several wrong in the first section and almost half of them wrong in the second section, so that probably knocked down your average question difficulty and, ultimately, your score. (Your score is still pretty good, though.)
18 Dec 2018, 19:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi Asianyc,
Could you clarify your first question?
Regarding your second question, the numerical section scores are not exact indicators of performance on the sections. Rather, each level represents a range of performance. So, you can perform at various levels and score, for instance, 50 in quant or 35 in verbal. So, your scoring Q50 on both tests does not mean that your performance in quant was the same on both tests. Rather, it appears that you performed at a higher level in quant on the second test, and thus scored higher overall even though your verbal score was lower.
Feel free to reach out with further questions.
Could you clarify your first question?
Regarding your second question, the numerical section scores are not exact indicators of performance on the sections. Rather, each level represents a range of performance. So, you can perform at various levels and score, for instance, 50 in quant or 35 in verbal. So, your scoring Q50 on both tests does not mean that your performance in quant was the same on both tests. Rather, it appears that you performed at a higher level in quant on the second test, and thus scored higher overall even though your verbal score was lower.
Feel free to reach out with further questions.
