Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 17:02 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 17:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
patto
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Jul 2021
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
863
 [15]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Argentina
GMAT 1: 630 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36 (Online)
Posts: 236
Kudos: 863
 [15]
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
eabhgoy
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Last visit: 14 Jan 2021
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 112
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
aniruddhawarang29
Joined: 24 Apr 2020
Last visit: 16 Feb 2022
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 392
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Insurance)
Posts: 26
Kudos: 18
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laborumplaceat
Joined: 06 Dec 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 124
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument uses a bidirectional relationship (singers mimic horns, horns mimic voices) to conclude that jazz is 'voicelike horns and hornlike voices.' Does the first sentence actually support the entire conclusion, or only the 'hornlike voices' half of it? This seems like a 'parts-to-whole' logical bridge that could be a weak point in more difficult questions.

eabhgoy


We can breakdown the stimulus to below:

Statement --> The best jazz singers use their voices much as horn players use their instruments.
Evidence/Fact to support the previous statement --> The great Billie Holiday thought of her singing voice as a horn, reshaping melody and words to increase their impact.
Supporting statement --> Conversely, jazz horn players achieve their distinctive sounds by emulating the spontaneous twists and turns of an impassioned voice.
Main Conclusion --> So jazz consists largely of voicelike horns and hornlike voices.

From the above we can see only the C can be correct.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
11,314
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 11,314
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
patto
The best jazz singers use their voices as much as horn players use their instruments. The great Billie Holiday thought of her singing voice as a horn, reshaping melody and words to increase their impact. Conversely, jazz horn players achieve their distinctive sounds by emulating the spontaneous twists and turns of an impassioned voice. So jazz consists largely of voice like horns and hornlike voices.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the claim that the best jazz singers use their voices much as horn players use their instruments?

(A) It is the argument’s main conclusion and is supported by another statement, which is itself supported by a further statement.
(B) It is the argument’s only conclusion, and each of the other statements in the argument is used to support it.
(C) It is a statement for which some evidence is provided and which in turn is used to provide support for the argument’s main conclusion.
(D) It is a statement for which no evidence is provided but which itself is used to support the argument’s only conclusion.
(E) It is a statement used to support a conclusion that in turn is used to support the argument’s main conclusion.

The opening claim is a supported premise that helps justify the final conclusion that jazz is largely voice like horns and hornlike voices.

(A) Wrong. The opening claim is not the main conclusion. The main conclusion is the last sentence.

(B) Wrong. The argument’s conclusion is the last sentence, so the opening claim cannot be the only conclusion.

(C) Correct. The passage gives evidence for the opening claim (Billie Holiday treating her voice like a horn, and horn players emulating a voice), and then uses that opening claim to support the argument’s main conclusion.

(D) Wrong. Evidence is provided for the opening claim, and the argument’s conclusion is not the opening claim.

(E) Wrong. The opening claim is not mainly used to support some intermediate conclusion that then supports the last sentence. It is a premise that directly supports the last sentence.

Answer: (C)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
11,314
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 11,314
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laborumplaceat
The argument uses a bidirectional relationship (singers mimic horns, horns mimic voices) to conclude that jazz is 'voicelike horns and hornlike voices.' Does the first sentence actually support the entire conclusion, or only the 'hornlike voices' half of it? This seems like a 'parts-to-whole' logical bridge that could be a weak point in more difficult questions.



It supports only the hornlike voices half.

First sentence: “best jazz singers use their voices like horn players use instruments” gives you “voices behave like horns,” not “horns behave like voices.” The “voicelike horns” half comes from the later “Conversely” sentence about horn players emulating a voice.

You’re also right about the parts to whole bridge: even if both halves are true for “the best” singers and for “jazz horn players,” jumping to “jazz consists largely of...” is an extra step that could be attacked in a tougher version.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts